It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wonders
Shrugging your shoulders is the height of intelligence eh? I don't think so. I AM 100% certain that God is real. I have no desire whatsoever to prove anything to anyone and I don't care who isn't satisfied, people ought to seek their beliefs rather than be spoon fed by money hungry preachers priests and pastors.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
The rational approach would be to accept that we can never be 100% certain - though i've yet to find a practising Christian who would even entertain the notion or remote possibility that there may not be a god....
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Technically speaking I think everyone should be agnostic, as no one can be 100% sure of anything.
Everyone is Agnostic - - whether they want to admit it or not.
Every Atheist is an Agnostic Atheist. Because logically and scientifically - - - god can not be proven or dis-proven.
Its a straight forward logical answer.
No surprise.
I guess what I meant to say is everyone should admit they are agnostic instead of being stuck in the "absolute" sides of the spectrum.
Originally posted by silent thunder
Richard Dawkins: I can't be sure God does not exist
www.telegraph.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
He is regarded as the most famous atheist in the world but last night Professor Richard Dawkins admitted he could not be sure that God does not exist.
There was surprise when Prof Dawkins acknowledged that he was less than 100 per cent certain of his conviction that there is no creator. An incredulous Sir Anthony replied: “You are described as the world’s most famous atheist.” Prof Dawkins said that he was “6.9 out of seven” sure of his beliefs.
He's just chickening out of his stance on the issue because he's getting old and wants to make sure he can get his free pass to "heaven" by saying he isn't entirely sure he is probably saying to god "oh sorry I kind of believe now"
Originally posted by Smack
This has always been Dawkins' position. This is nothing new. He has also stated that he cannot be 100% certain that Santa Claus does not exist.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by reaxi0n
I am not wrong, simples. Just because you cannot see something does not make it exist. Just because you do not have proof of something does not make it non-existent either. You must accept those facts.
Originally posted by eatbliss
It is very progressive, IMHO, that he admits he doesn't know 100%. No one can. No matter what, we are all agnostics, whether we have the courage to admit it or not. Since 'God' by his/her/its very nature is too large of a concept to grasp, and therefore, unknowable, we are mostly only trying to prove our idea (or false image/idol) of God when we do try to 'prove' the existence. Kudos to Mr. Dawkins for his courage and honesty on this matter.
Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by silent thunder
Perhaps Richard Dawkins,being an academic has heard through the grapevine that CERN scientists are coming to the realization that Higgs Bosun, The God particle is in fact ... GOD.
"Let the one who does wrong, still do wrong; and the one who is filthy, still be filthy; and let the one who is righteous, still practice righteousness; and the one who is holy, still keep himself holy." Revelation 22:11
Originally posted by Xieon
Originally posted by Wonders
Shrugging your shoulders is the height of intelligence eh? I don't think so. I AM 100% certain that God is real. I have no desire whatsoever to prove anything to anyone and I don't care who isn't satisfied, people ought to seek their beliefs rather than be spoon fed by money hungry preachers priests and pastors.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
The rational approach would be to accept that we can never be 100% certain - though i've yet to find a practising Christian who would even entertain the notion or remote possibility that there may not be a god....
The way it should be. Personally I don't want to be saved by any god who has chosen you to be the personal messenger of theirs, and can instruct me how I should live my life.
Originally posted by dron020
I use to be hard line atheist. But about a year ago I started to read religious scriptures from Budhism and Kabalah and I found them to be truly based on a. Knowledge system rather than on a faith based system. I have come to my personal conclusion that we know about 1 percent of the information of our reality. And no book or men can fully say what is the meaning of life. The truth is that our reality is more wild and amazing than what any scientist or any religious. Person can imagine
Budshm is a philosophy on how men can control his cycles of emotions. And how mens purpose in this exestince is to find Enlightment. Since we mostly function in this reality with in our mind Budhsm does not even approach the idea of the universal mind to which some culture call God. I do think that you will find no conflicts in Budhsim
Originally posted by miniatus
Originally posted by dron020
I use to be hard line atheist. But about a year ago I started to read religious scriptures from Budhism and Kabalah and I found them to be truly based on a. Knowledge system rather than on a faith based system. I have come to my personal conclusion that we know about 1 percent of the information of our reality. And no book or men can fully say what is the meaning of life. The truth is that our reality is more wild and amazing than what any scientist or any religious. Person can imagine
I am attracted to the budhist doctrine.. but I am still an atheist, if I had to pick a region however, it would be that.