It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Space ball: UFO shocks Brazilians (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

page: 5
29
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by d4red3vil
I think I have seen something similar inside the Vatican??



There are dozens...



edit on 25-2-2012 by Arken because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 03:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


Thanks



Its a sign !

All bow down to mighty space ball.

Still going back to my previous question.

The locals said that they could hear liquid inside would this not have burnt on re-entry and if the liquid is what we think it is then the locals in the vid are already dead



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 03:34 AM
link   
reply to post by judus
 


And if it was only a "fuel tank" of a satellite it would be break in thousand pieces after the crash and burn and melt in the re-entry in atmosphere.
And it is NOT....

So it isn't a fuel tank, and it was not so high in altitude.

edit on 25-2-2012 by Arken because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 04:46 AM
link   
reply to post by judus
 


"UFO shocks Brazilians..." then "... An identified metal sphere..."

This is why no one takes this subjects seriously... or even reads the rest of the thread...



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 07:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by judus
reply to post by Arken
 


Thanks



Its a sign !

All bow down to mighty space ball.

Still going back to my previous question.

The locals said that they could hear liquid inside would this not have burnt on re-entry and if the liquid is what we think it is then the locals in the vid are already dead



That's funny! Since this is the same object from December last year, you can assume it is a fuel tank for a satellite. Obviously the satellite it belonged to was not destroyed in space, (the tentative reason for destroying satellites in space is that this fuel tank has a habit of surviving re-entry), and that rather than bow down to the space ball, it might just flatten you. Anyway destroying satellites in space is not fashionable at the moment.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 07:55 AM
link   
www.psi-pci.com... its defanitly a hydrzine tnk i woud not be going near it never mind touching it



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 07:58 AM
link   
There seems to be a lot more UFO activity in south America than all other parts of the world , I wonder what they find so fascinating down their.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 07:59 AM
link   
Looks like a fuel tank off of a satellite to me.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 07:59 AM
link   
Dont know what that is. Reminds me of the statue in the Vatican

Vatican Ball



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


it is a hyrazine tank look at the images on this link.
cs.astrium.eads.net...



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 08:04 AM
link   
broken link delete me

edit on 25-2-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by judus
 


it looks like there is a little alien sat dead inside it



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 10:01 AM
link   
Well whether it's alien technology or more importantly, human created - I WANT TO KNOW WHO TO SUE IF ONE LANDS ON MY HOUSE? Oh let me quess 'an act of god!'

Has it occured to anyone else that all this space junk up there could interfere with the quality of sun light reaching the Earth?

I cannot believe we are trashing space as well as our planet



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by EartOccupant
 


and the shuttle would way more than the moon and you would porbly neet the energy of 50 suns to launch it



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by MichaelYoung
Almost certainly a chunk of satellite.

Or...

Any chance we're witnessing the dawn of viral marketing for Cloverfield 2? Now THAT would be exciting news.
Cloverfield 1 sucked! Why would they want to come out with 2?



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by judus
What the hell is this.

It's obviously one of the following

1. Swamp gas.
2. Venus.
3. Northern lights.
4. Top secret airplane.
5. Hoax.
6. Something a redneck made up.
7. A piece of a uber secret Chinese satellite that must not be talked about.
8. Photoshopped (see #5)

I'm sure it will fall under one of those. Always does.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by judus
 


Evidently Nibiru was a lot smaller than i first thought..



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
 
it is a hyrazine tank look at the images on this link.
cs.astrium.eads.net...

Ding-Ding we have a winner it seems. Scroll down link. Nice job, haven123!


Hydrazine Diaphragm Tanks
edit on 25-2-2012 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by GLontra
It's not a "fuel tank", right?


It looks exactly like a hydrazine tank. In the article they mention that when moved it sounded like liquid sloshed around in it, that's pretty good confirmation that it is indeed a hydrazine tank.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   
How many more fuel tanks from satellites do people need to see before they realise that they are fuel tanks from satellites and not UFOs.



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join