It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MagnumOpus
Currently, The IAEA total access to facilities is a bit of a problem when the crooked country next door wants to blow up your uranium enrichment plant, as showing the IAEA some of the underground areas exposes any weakness to an attack, as the IAEA will tell the full details of the underground plant's vulnerabilty. Being totally open, at this point in time, would not be wise for Iran, as the IAEA isn't confidential on facity risk issues. Iran isn't going to open the door for a facilty attack, as they built them underground to avoid an Israeli attack.
Originally posted by nenothtu
lacking element so far is opportunity, because they have not yet construct a nuclear bomb.
Originally posted by MagnumOpus
Originally posted by nenothtu
lacking element so far is opportunity, because they have not yet construct a nuclear bomb.
There we have it------in your own words----they have not construct a nuclear bomb.
And the US tells they ended the nuclear bomb project years ago. They say nuclear bombs are evil and they don't want one.
Thus, Iran can make use of nuclear for power and peace.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by MagnumOpus
If Iran would quit threatening to wipe Israel off the map...
If Iran would quit promising all out support for any parties to attack Israel...
If Iran would comply with their treaty obligations...
Originally posted by nenothtu
Nor have I ever said they do have one. If they had one, we would not be having this discussion. Have you a point to make?
No, they don't - however much you wish they did.
Within treaty limits, yes. Is there any danger they will be in compliance any time soon?
Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by MagnumOpus
A simple "no, I'm incapable of making myself clear" would have sufficed, rather than launching into another incomprehensible diatribe of gibberish invoking ancient Sumerian gods.
Originally posted by MagnumOpus
In the Middle East scheme of things, Isreal is the militant mad dog that attacks anything and everything using the pre-emptive strike excuse.
Israel is the one most given to telling lies on nuclear issues, not Iran. Iran is likely running in full compliance and not after any atomic bombs.
The Zionist religion promotes telling lies and faking others out, and the Islamic is more truthful.
Iran appears to want to invite Israel for their typical pre-emtive strike paranoia. Then they can decair open war on Israel and they'll show the IAEA there was no bomb projects in Iran. Leaving Israel hit with International War Crimes issues and the dismantlement of Israel's political system and taking away their weapons. imho
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by milominderbinder
Learn Arabic and keep towing their rope, and maybe they'll kill you last.
...says the guy whose avatar is a stylized Hospitaller.
You are aware that the REAL Hospitaller's believed that a divinely inspired and prophetic goose (Yes...a goose. That's not a typo) was responsible for leading the peasant rabble and Peter the Hermit to Constantinople, correct?
Dead serious. The first Crusade started in Flanders, France when the peasants "jumped the gun" and started following The Holy Goose to their eternal salvation ahead of Pope Urban II's organized military campaign.
Furthermore...you are aware that those very same Hospitallers were responsible for the beheading of hundreds of thousands of unarmed women, children, and the elderly in the name of their God and the aforementioned Divine Goose...correct?
Sorry bud...but you sort of lose any type of real credibility on all things Middle East when you show up dressed in a crusading knights halloween costume.
Get over it. It's an avatar, not a photograph. I'm not really 900 years old, nor do I habitually dress in soup cans.
Have you got anything to address the points I've made, or is the best you have a deflectionary assault on a drawing?
Nice try, no cigar.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by MagnumOpus
A simple "no, I'm incapable of making myself clear" would have sufficed, rather than launching into another incomprehensible diatribe of gibberish invoking ancient Sumerian gods.
Work on your reading comprehension skills. I understood exactly what MagnumOpus said, and, more importantly, how it directly pertained to the topic at hand.
Also...catch up on your History. The Babylonians were not Sumerian. The two civilizations were separated by AT LEAST 2500 YEARS...perhaps even longer.
No wonder you are so confused. Chronologically speaking, that's like trying lumping the Mayan Empire in with 1950's America and wondering why Elvis Presley wasn't depicted at Teotihuacan when he was clearly such a big deal just a little to the North.
In the Middle East scheme of things, Isreal is the militant mad dog that attacks anything and everything using the pre-emptive strike excuse.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by nenothtu
Please at least have your avatar change it's shirt before I take you seriously
Are you kidding? It's recycled hemp - how much more PC or green can he get? It's for the environment - and it's for the children!
Israel should sign it, if Iran had 300 nukes, the world would be pissed off.
"Should"?
"SHOULD"?
I think a lot of things "should" happen that aren't going to. I think the Ayatollahs in Iran "should" resign first thing tomorrow morning and step down to let the people rule. What I think "should" happen will in no way affect what actually does, or the right or wrong of what actually does.
Originally posted by MagnumOpus
reply to post by rebellender
Then the Israel Bomb needs desided to kill JFK, another pre-emptive strike.
Originally posted by rebellender
Care to comment on this one?
I can SEE how YOU would say such hearsay but tell me more about this one
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by MagnumOpus
A simple "no, I'm incapable of making myself clear" would have sufficed, rather than launching into another incomprehensible diatribe of gibberish invoking ancient Sumerian gods.
Work on your reading comprehension skills. I understood exactly what MagnumOpus said, and, more importantly, how it directly pertained to the topic at hand.
No thanks, I'm good. If he can't express himself clearly, he can't. It's not my job to puzzle my way through it, deciphering as I go.
Also...catch up on your History. The Babylonians were not Sumerian. The two civilizations were separated by AT LEAST 2500 YEARS...perhaps even longer.
I suggest you brush up on YOUR history. Babylonia was an outgrowth of Sumeria around 2200 BC, complete with a co-opt of all the older Sumerian gods. "Tammuz" is not Babylonian, it is a Hebrew designation for Sumerian Dumuzi, a shepherd god and the consort of Innana, who herself was later known as "Ishtar".
I see you completely missed the reference to "The Bull of Heaven" as well, yet I'm the one who needs to "brush up"
No wonder you are so confused. Chronologically speaking, that's like trying lumping the Mayan Empire in with 1950's America and wondering why Elvis Presley wasn't depicted at Teotihuacan when he was clearly such a big deal just a little to the North.
Not even close. No cookie for you
Originally posted by hmdphantom
You people are dawning in your illusion and be safe there.
But don't bother liberating other nations.
And you think that people in Iran don't back Iranian religious government.
That is just your governmental tv tells you.