It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
* * * *
Probably because it's only those damned fool conspiracy web sites that insists there has to be any further usable footage to begin with. * * * *
Originally posted by dubiousone
I have always wondered why you spend so much time hanging out and publishing posts on "damn fool consipracy web sites" such as this. Are you trying to redeem us from our damn fool stupidity and ignorance? If so, that's damn fool considerate of you. Or are you just a damn fool of the kind you like to think the rest of us are? Maybe the pay is to good not to do it. Or maybe you have nothing better to do.
Originally posted by rogueoperative
The thing about these conspiracies - and the Pentagon one hits close to home for me - is truthers have concluded the government's investigation on 9/11 is bogus but yet offer up no logical alternatives. What alternatives they do offer are more implausible that he "official story". Then you tell them that and they so prove that < insert some conspiracy here > isn't true. How about ...uh no...the burden of proof is on you to prove your allegations and your claims and so far none of you can do that.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by ANOK
And by the same regard the Truth Movement has got nowhere.
Part of that is down to your insistent position above. No, you don't have to form an alternative hypothesis. You don't have to do anything - and indeed 99 per cent of the time you don't. But to pretend that this attitude will garner you the support you need or bring you nearer to a new investigation is pure fantasy. And it makes informed observers doubt your motives.
Originally posted by ANOKwatch you all type long winded full of nothing replies
Originally posted by hdutton
reply to post by hooper
I have a friend who put a small radar unit onto a cane. I am something like this would fit into you collection of walking canes.
I say this because you seem to fit into the catagory of folks the man was talking about when he said "none are so blind as those who will not see'.
Really, it is people like yourself whom I do pity so much.
I don't feel you could ever grasp the meaning of an explaination of this statement so I will just save myself the trouble.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by rogueoperative
The thing about these conspiracies - and the Pentagon one hits close to home for me - is truthers have concluded the government's investigation on 9/11 is bogus but yet offer up no logical alternatives. What alternatives they do offer are more implausible that he "official story". Then you tell them that and they so prove that < insert some conspiracy here > isn't true. How about ...uh no...the burden of proof is on you to prove your allegations and your claims and so far none of you can do that.
'Truthers' have no obligation to supply you with an alternative version of the OS. It's ridiculous to think because the OS is the only version of the events it must be true.
Just asking if a plane hit the building...do you know how many times a day they get asked that? Enough to get sick and tired of it so he probably gave you a snotty answer
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by smyleegrl
Just asking if a plane hit the building...do you know how many times a day they get asked that? Enough to get sick and tired of it so he probably gave you a snotty answer
I doubt they get asked "if" very often. More likely they phrase it "when the plane hit".
Those that believe it was a US conspiracy are few and far between in the real world.
Have you noticed the lack of new threads on here lately?
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by hdutton
reply to post by hooper
I have a friend who put a small radar unit onto a cane. I am something like this would fit into you collection of walking canes.
I say this because you seem to fit into the catagory of folks the man was talking about when he said "none are so blind as those who will not see'.
Really, it is people like yourself whom I do pity so much.
I don't feel you could ever grasp the meaning of an explaination of this statement so I will just save myself the trouble.
Hey, I am more than willing to look at anything. I just have not yet been shown anything. Lots of talk. Lots of incredulity. Lots of claims of this or that being "impossible". Lots of unsubstantiate and convenient personal storeis. But actual evidence to support any of these conspiracy fantasies? None. Nada.
You know one of the problems with keeping an "open mind" is that people will try and throw in a little garbage from time to time.