South American Trading Block (Mercosur) Agree to Block British Soverign Flagged Vessels into their P

page: 5
28
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


You always make me laugh!



Flavian

Never laugh at the mentally retarded, it's not really the done thing


This 'ludwigvonwhatever' person posting on here is seriously either playing Devils Advocate or is just just a few cells short of an ameoba !!!




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by newyorkee
reply to post by michael1983l
 

IMO
the native american population doesnt exist anymore where ever you made colonies,,,,,with exceptions of coarse....but mostly....the british tend to make some room first before just setting up shop.....


Would that be like the same way you nuked Japan twice before beginning the unending military occupation you have forced on the Japanese?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by michael1983l
 


facts are facts.Mass murdering 1.8 billion people and then denying it cannot change it.


You are right facts are facts, that is why you should get them right when you quote them. India has never even had a population of 1.8billion people, so I struggle to understand how the British could have killed them all?

www.google.co.uk...:IND&dl=en&hl=en&q=population+of+india



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by newyorkee
reply to post by Flavian
 


explain the logic first....thats the fun part about it..it is very easy to explain....because all of it is based on truth....yet you argue the morality of the situation......not logic.....when you came there there were no other countires....now there are...and you are not part of their community....you are just a parasite in their part of the world...

bad things happen....I say....the truth is you should expect this,,,,,you are live in foreigners in south america,,,,,,,deal with that for as long as your citizens live there.......

and I can now end my comment with a deny ignorance too....am I cool too
deny ignorance
deny ignorance
deny ignorance
deny ignorance
buyaka


No, you are simply deluded. You ask for logic? Ok, here it is, nice and slowly for you......:

No one lived on the Islands - there was no one there. How is it therefore possible to "give them back"? Who do you propose we give them to?
People have the right to self determination. The people that live there choose to remain part of the UK rather than go over to a country that has no ties to them.
I could go on but lets see how you deal with those first.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by newyorkee
reply to post by michael1983l
 

IMO
the native american population doesnt exist anymore where ever you made colonies,,,,,with exceptions of coarse....but mostly....the british tend to make some room first before just setting up shop.....


Your right the native americans don't exist any more, that is because the USA systematically exterminated them.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:47 AM
link   
reply to post by michael1983l
 


post-invasion excess deaths totaled 0.6 billion, 1757-1837; 0.5 billion, 1837-1901 under Queen Victoria; and 0.4 billion in 1901-1947; this being 1.5 billion in total and 1.8 billion victims if the carnage in the various royalty-ruled Indian British Protectorate States are included..



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Twiptwop
 

Um i dont defend the american empire past its own borders....or condone the use of atomic weapons.....I dont know what gave you that impression...but I guess you are talking more than actually listening....happens when you blindly defend something withou considering other points of view.....it becomes obvious when the sheer passion of your argument must insult others rather than speak to them.....

edit on 21-12-2011 by newyorkee because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:50 AM
link   
reply to post by michael1983l
 


atleast we didn't mass murder 1.8 billion and steal their riches and gold.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by michael1983l
 


post-invasion excess deaths totaled 0.6 billion, 1757-1837; 0.5 billion, 1837-1901 under Queen Victoria; and 0.4 billion in 1901-1947; this being 1.5 billion in total and 1.8 billion victims if the carnage in the various royalty-ruled Indian British Protectorate States are included..



If India only had a population of 434,849,000 in 1960, how could we have killed 600,000,000 in 1757?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Twiptwop
 


check the period :1757-1837.You had the policy of excessive taxation,starvation and murder of the natives.We were not as sheepish as the indians.We revolted and kicked you out.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by michael1983l
 


post-invasion excess deaths totaled 0.6 billion, 1757-1837; 0.5 billion, 1837-1901 under Queen Victoria; and 0.4 billion in 1901-1947; this being 1.5 billion in total and 1.8 billion victims if the carnage in the various royalty-ruled Indian British Protectorate States are included..



And where did you happen to obtain those lies from, please provide a source. Can you not do the Maths, it is physically impossible for the British to have killed 1.8 billion indians as there has never been close to that figure throughout those historical times in total population. End of conversation with you as you are clearly are clueless.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by Twiptwop
 


check the period :1757-1837.You had the policy of excessive taxation,starvation and murder of the natives.We were not as sheepish as the indians.We revolted and kicked you out.


Your words were, post invasion we killed 600,000,000. I'm going to ask you again. If India only had a population of 434,849,000 in 1960, how could we have killed 600,000,000 in 1757?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:56 AM
link   
Guys and Gals...

I think we've strayed well off the OP's topic.. which is a breach of the T&C and the CoC's of this and any other Thread/forum.

So can we get back on topic or have a MOD, close this down.

Sorry to be a party pooper, but all this Brit bashing and Empire Envy is beginning to bug me.. Why can't we all just be friends.. it is Christmas after all (for Christians anyways)..


Peace

Rock Ape



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Twiptwop

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by Twiptwop
 


check the period :1757-1837.You had the policy of excessive taxation,starvation and murder of the natives.We were not as sheepish as the indians.We revolted and kicked you out.


Your words were, post invasion we killed 600,000,000. I'm going to ask you again. If India only had a population of 434,849,000 in 1960, how could we have killed 600,000,000 in 1757?

from 1757 to 1837.not 1757.Anyway7s its proven fact that you mass murdered them and you must pay reparations of maybe a 1000 pounds for each indian you mass murdered in the mega genocide.

1000*1.8 billion=1.8 trillion pounds Atleast.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by michael1983l

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by michael1983l
 


post-invasion excess deaths totaled 0.6 billion, 1757-1837; 0.5 billion, 1837-1901 under Queen Victoria; and 0.4 billion in 1901-1947; this being 1.5 billion in total and 1.8 billion victims if the carnage in the various royalty-ruled Indian British Protectorate States are included..



And where did you happen to obtain those lies from, please provide a source. Can you not do the Maths, it is physically impossible for the British to have killed 1.8 billion indians as there has never been close to that figure throughout those historical times in total population. End of conversation with you as you are clearly are clueless.


I have stated my source in the previous post.Go read through it.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Rock Ape
 


Well said, have a star.




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by michael1983l
 


atleast we didn't mass murder 1.8 billion and steal their riches and gold.


A man (?) from Texas crying and screaming foul over history which we were never personnally repsonsible, accusing modern day British people of mass murder and theft of Gold when in reality TODAYS modern Gold is called ''OIL'' and he and alot of his American Friends TODAY are repsonsible in our modern world for stamping all over the planet in pursuit of Black GOLD and a lifestyle they crave which they also deprive from many parts of the rest of the world........

Ludwigvonmises........... Growup and shut up because YOU are the biggest mass murderer and criminal of the MODERN age....

Regards

PDUK
edit on 21-12-2011 by PurpleDog UK because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


Here is some interesting reading for you. The article at the foot of the page titled "Hall Of Shame" should enlighten you:-

www.stephen-knapp.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 05:05 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.






top topics



 
28
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join