It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Thugs beat 84-year-old man in cruel game of 'get the old geezer'...

page: 6
20
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:10 PM
link   
I figured they were black, if that is a racist statement then too bad. What has happened in society to make me jump to that conclusion? Look at history folks thay are a bunch of savages!!!!



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fishticon84
A Clockwork Orange was a pretty violent movie for its time, but is it because it had WHITE men as its protagonist villains that it did not make people want to go out and commit similar acts as much as BLACK media tends to make kids do?


A Clockwork Orange inspired plenty of violence.Why Kubrick made this is beyond me.It was a lame book and a lame movie and it actually did inspire idiots to violence.

Obviously your problem though is with BLACK vs WHITE. Try and at least hide your racist leanings . What is "BLACK" media? BET? You think BET incites violence?

Surely you don't mean hiphop or gangster rap. I think you'll find that as far as the publication and proliferation of such goes,it's pretty much white entertainment.I'm white and grew up listening to Wu Tang and Mobb Deep among others. I don't attack innocent helpless people.

Maybe the problem is Yellow media, not Hearst publications, but Asians.Maybe it's Bruce Lees fault.

Could we blame Australian Aboriginee media perhaps?

Let's blame someone, just not whitey
edit on 21-10-2011 by blah yada because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


What "racism"? I am having extreme difficulty wrapping my head around your continued ignorance. This must be a debate strategy for mentally challenged liberals - ignore presented facts, attack the presenter, continue to ignore additional facts, attack the presenter, continue to ignore yet more facts, attack the presenter.

You should really get yourself checked out by a registered Psychiatrist. You are either delusional or suffering from a much more serious malady. Best of luck in your treatment.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by 547000
 


Please don't misunderstand me....I'm not trying to start an argument and mess up this thread. But I think it's wrong to say one race is more violent than another. There are good and bad in every race. I don't want to argue, so I'll leave it at that.
edit on 10/21/2011 by StealthyKat because: (no reason given)


You are positively right! In every race there is the good, bad and the ugly. Knowing that is just plain common sense...and if a person thinks otherwise...they are a fool.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by FissionSurplus
If I were that old gentleman, the next time I went for a walk in the park, I would be packing a pistol, fully loaded.



Catch the perps, take them out to a deserted back road and chain them ankle to ankle around a telephone poll. Provide one large hunting knife which could be used by the three toughest to cut the weakest guys foot off to free themselves....

Hopefully they'd kill each other in a wild scramble for sole possession of the knife....



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 


Racists are the first to say they aren't racist. Are you 17? Do you have any reading comprehension? Re-read the OP and then your first few responses and then remind me again why you are not a racist? Is it so difficult for you to understand individuals made this choice, not a race? Oh that's right - I read something that said black people are bad...load up my gun.

CJ



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


no, this was four kids out committing hate crimes, that is racist. lets see a hate crime happen to you and you not say it was racially fueled.
edit on 21-10-2011 by gougitousakusha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by kozmo
 


Racists are the first to say they aren't racist. Are you 17? Do you have any reading comprehension? Re-read the OP and then your first few responses and then remind me again why you are not a racist? Is it so difficult for you to understand individuals made this choice, not a race? Oh that's right - I read something that said black people are bad...load up my gun.

CJ


Another fail!
The premise is that the African-American race has a greater tendency toward violence than the white Anglo-Saxon race. As a result, individuals of a certain race may demonstrate a greater propensity toward violence versus another race. Studies, evidence and facts were presented ad nauseum to support this. I am not a racist for presenting facts. Nor am I racist for stating that I am a proud supporter of the 2nd Ammendment and a proud concealed carry holder who will not hesitate to defend myself.

But somehow your meager offering masquerading as a brain isn't able to comprehend such simple dialogue and has instead elected to continue to display complete ignorance. Thanks for playing.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Correction **Get the old, WHITE geezer**

Urban Blacks have been taught to hate white people and now that hate is boiling over to physical action. This will continue to happen until one day white people will start joining together for protection and strength in numbers, which will cause further division. I wonder what the other races will do when the line is drawn and sides will have to be picked??



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by NadaCambia
 


Actually it is not whites that start wars. Heads of state start wars and black heads of state cause a disportionate number of wars as compared to white heads of state. Now Whites might cause larger wars, but that is obviously not related to their race, but rather what nation they lead. Mr. Obama seems to be pretty good at starting wars, or at least engaging in warfare. Ever read African history over the last 50 years?


Well, imperialism might be a better term, or successful imperialism.

Over all I think my point went straight over your head. Because even if not statistically true, there are plenty of 'crimes' that white people commit disproportionally.

My point was to highlight the stupidity of such an argument, because even if true, it tells you nothing about white people, as being white isn't a factor in their decisions to be greedy imperialists.

You seem to be agreeing with what I was trying to say while not even realising it. It's sad that rather than see my argument for what it is you want to carry it on as some sort of black vs white penis measuring contest of crime and negativity.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by kozmo
The premise is that the African-American race has a greater tendency toward violence than the white Anglo-Saxon race. As a result, individuals of a certain race may demonstrate a greater propensity toward violence versus another race. Studies, evidence and facts were presented ad nauseum to support this.


That's not true. And that's why you're racist, because you're talking complete nonsense.

There is no biological tendency for crime amongst certain ethnicities, only social upbringings and settings that are irrelevant to race.

Using your same "facts" we could say Eastern Europeans as a genetic people have a greater tendency toward violence than Anglo-Americans. It's completely ridiculous.

That black people commit more crimes than white people in America is evidence of nothing.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
Poverty and violence go hand in hand in the city. Unfortunately It's part of survival in the inner city.

It has more to do with Poverty than simply Race....I really wish that people could reach that level of understanding ?

But instead many here merely conclude that the skin color automatically translates to one's behavior and actions ?



PEACE

edit on 21-10-2011 by nh_ee because: LIVE FREE OR DIE



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   
Here is where it all started to go wrong with the Blacks in America.





Communism's African-American Soviet Republic By Paul Kengor

Organized Communism has long targeted black Americans, an ongoing effort which has survived the fall of the USSR. Kudos to Peter Wilson, who here at American Thinker highlighted the manifesto of the Revolutionary Communist Party, who are in their glory with the occupation of Wall Street by their Marxist brethren and the usual assortment of easily manipulated liberal/progressive dupes -- the dependable, university-trained foot soldiers who fill the streets.

Readers of Wilson's post surely were shocked by what they read. Are there really people who believe these things? You bet there are. I deal with it constantly -- and it's nothing new at all. Perhaps the most stunning element of the Revolutionary Communist Party's manifesto is the call for black Americans to unite into a separate, autonomous republic in the American South. Wilson cited the Revolutionary Communist Party's constitution, which called upon African-Americans to forge an autonomous region comprising "the southern part of the former imperialist United States of America."

That decision would be made by a special vote in which only African-Americans would be eligible to participate. Insane? Yes. The concept is fortunately insane to African-Americans as well as all Americans. But I'm here to tell you it isn't anything new. From 1922-30, the Soviet Comintern and American Communist Party launched a long-term effort to relentlessly target black Americans. The Comintern ordered the American Communist Party to identify black causes in the Jim Crow South in particular. This push to recruit black Americans is one of the most salient features littered today throughout the declassified Comintern Archives on Communist Party USA (CPUSA)................................


www.americanthinker.com...



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Their race has nothing to do with why they did it... The only thing shocking is that people still seem to have issues with race, in this day and age.


Fact of the matter is, white kids don't have gangs like the Crips, F.O.L.K. or Blood. Fact of the matter is, despite what you may claim, African Americans still represent the majority of all crime. And the political incorrect fact is, there's more black on white crime then vice versa.

Want sources? Use Google.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Frontkjemper
 


The Narcotics have been delivered there in the Black communities for this exact reason.

Just as the gangs existed during Prohibition, comprised of Whites so do the gangs related to the Narcotics industry today.

Then they were Italians and Irish....today they are Black.

It's about making money and nothing more.




posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Several stereotypical traits are associated with *edit*; smoking, drinking and taking drugs[21] in gangs on street corners and outside shops, petty thievery and violence,[22] vandalism and graffiti, an exaggerated "tough" gangster-like voice and lingo and foul, aggressive language *edit* housing accommodation, unemployment and state benefits *edit* (and despite this still appearing to have money for show),[22] teenage girls being sexually promiscuous and smoking whilst pregnant,[23][24] driving a highly modified and chromed up *edit* (in particular)*edit*[25] Ford Sierra, Ford Escort[26] or *edit* usually souped up with alloys, stickers, oversized spoiler, side panels, exhaust pipe and engine,[27] painted white or in some shocking color, enhanced speakers blasting hip-hop, R&B *edit* and chewing whilst being spoken to. Stereotypical *edit*


This is an article from wikipedia. My challenge to all of you is to identify the ethnic group it is referencing. I will post the article unedited and with a link, shortly.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by 547000
 




I blame gansta black culture shown in media around the world. That crap isn't real, but these idiot kids aspire to it.


Hey I bet you those kids all watch Scarface and aspire to be like him.
I get what you're saying and you're correct, but what about all the glorifying in movies also?

The individual has to have it in them to attack an elderly man also not just cos he's black.

I dont think this has anything to do with race and more to do with the fact the those individuals are violent by design and nature probably.

I understand that if it was the other way around then there would be more outcry by the black community, but that's cos they speek up.

What's stopping the white community from making noise? Only themselves.

So who's to blame for that.

I hope the guy gets left alone and he can go for his walks, he's more than earned his place in the world at 84.



posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 03:35 PM
link   
same thing happened to my pops back in 2006... but it was a gang initiation thing.

He had over 2 dozen staple stitches on his head, and a broken wrist. He was 68 at the time...

But yea, these attacks happen and they are brutal. Wish they wouldn't happen



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join