It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Flatfish
For the record, it was LaRouche who had the Obama Hitler posters. Wanna see? While we are on the subject of LaRouche, that guy is really a mixed bag. He tried to form his own labour party, and the symbal was the fist, same as the Communist Party and incidentally the OWS logo on the early posters as well. And you know what? He ran for election in the Democrat Party many times. He has flirted with socialist organizations and strangely enough backed Reagan's SDI. An odd combination.
In 1967 LaRouche began teaching classes on Marx's dialectical materialism at New York City's Free School, and attracted a group of students from Columbia University and the City College of New York, recommending that they read Das Kapital, as well as Hegel, Kant, and Leibniz. During the 1968 Columbia University protests, he organized his supporters under the name the National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC). The aim of the NCLC was to win control of the Students for a Democratic Society branch—the university's main activist group—and build a political alliance between students, local residents, organized labor, and the Columbia faculty.[17
en.wikipedia.org...
So just because some LaRouche ppl showed up at a Tea party doesn't mean they ran it or are a major constituent. I Noticed that the communist party is roaming about the OWS crowd quite a bit. Do they run it?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
The OWS also seem to be targeting the US, as if there are no other financial arenas involved. I don't see anyone talking about London or Tokyo or the Chinese. How about what the Chinese have done. They devalued their own currency in order to out-compete us.
Why is it that the US is always the Big Bag Wolf? What about the other Bilderberg players? This is Intl intrigue.
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by bigvanhorn
Yes I agree, the tea party was taken over by mr beck and Palin and any credibility they had went down with them!
its sad that these movements of thousands can be taken over by a hand full of people and then turned upside down.
I will see this happening to OWS unless they all change their game plans and dont let any kind of political pundit into their circle. its by the people for the people! Not by the people, for a few greedy politicians.
Don't forget it was taken over by homophobic, racist, bigoted, moronic, uncivil, illogical human beings known as Republican voters as well. They are extremely bitter individuals who can not get over the fact a black man is in office, oh and him being a Democrat is also a kick in the balls.
These people were Not around protesting Bush, so don't try to pretend they were. They were happily in front of their television sets with Fox News on telling them "Everything is Ok." Now Obama is in office, "Everything is ruined."
F these people.
Name calling is just a technique liberals use when they can’t defend their policies. Please try to defend the record spending of you messiah! Please defend socialized medicine that we can’t afford. Please defend wealth redistribution. Please defend the over regulation of corporations.
You liberals are all the same. You have unsustainable ideas and you belittle anyone who doesn’t agree. The reality is that you can’t show me on paper how this country can pay for all of the things you want. Liberal policies destroy the free market….then again….that is also your agenda, right? You have no knowledge what it takes to create jobs or you wouldn’t support all of the things that kill jobs. Read the constitution and you will understand how America is supposed to work. If you don’t like it …..PLEASE move to another country!
Originally posted by Screwed
Thank you very much for this thread.
However, the people who agree with you don't need this information
and
The people who need this information will never agree with you.
It is sad but there are so many people (especially on this web site) who are so deeply ingrained into the left/right paradigm that they have little hope of ever freeing themselves.
They are just dug in too deep.
I could be wrong but I have yet to ever see anyone do a total 180 and admit/realize they they have been wrong in
their polarizing views and change the way they approach polarizing topics.
Edit to add:
The last line of this post originally finished with,
"You either 'get it' or you don't".
Implying that people who are of a polarized mindset don't "get it"
and people who have outgrown the need for a polarized mindset do "Get it".
Then I realized after I posted it that this statement was in itself POLARIZING!!!!
You either get it or you don't???
Agghhh, this polarizing mindset ensnares even the most astute obsevers of this phenomenon sometimes.
So, in the interest of fair play I am outing myself and letting everyone know that I am human too.edit on 10-10-2011 by Screwed because: (no reason given)
A recent political movement started by many small groups across the country using social media as a means to communicate with their peers. This group isn’t protesting the government, but the hub of the US financial system known as Wall Street.
Okay, they must be bored hippies. Oh, wait, no, they’re Socialists! Wait one! A Ron Paul T-shirt? But, but, but….. Oops, no, they’re anarchists! Oh no…Oh, Man…military vets? WTF? Oh ,I know. Obama arranged this, right? OMG! Wait! They must be Communists! Okay, who bribed the Granny Brigade… No, strike that, they must just hate rich people?
Now that The idea has been planted into your head, what do you do next? Support both sides? No not going to work? Join one side and not the other? Sure you can, but that won’t help. Realize that both movements are one in the same VIA changing who is in power in the financial sector and government? YES! I believe that’s where both sides can agree on.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
You vs Yourself?
Sorry, I'm not a Tea Partier, I believe in equality for all, I am for women's rights, I am anti war whether its a Republican OR Democrat in office, etc.
The Tea Party is still the biggest joke in this country right now.
Originally posted by mishigas
Now that The idea has been planted into your head, what do you do next? Support both sides? No not going to work? Join one side and not the other? Sure you can, but that won’t help. Realize that both movements are one in the same VIA changing who is in power in the financial sector and government? YES! I believe that’s where both sides can agree on.
Don't even try to compare the OWS with the TPM. Not even close.
Yesterday at the OWS site there was a person who took a dump on a Police Dept. cruiser. That's right, he defecated on a police car!
Today the Occupy people in Boston were chanting "We wont leave until you give us jobs!".
That's right, they want others to Give Them Jobs!
The OWS is a joke and an embarassment. Why would anyone want to be associated with them?
Originally posted by Screwed
Thank you very much for this thread.
However, the people who agree with you don't need this information
and
The people who need this information will never agree with you.
It is sad but there are so many people (especially on this web site) who are so deeply ingrained into the left/right paradigm that they have little hope of ever freeing themselves.
They are just dug in too deep.
I could be wrong but I have yet to ever see anyone do a total 180 and admit/realize they they have been wrong in
their polarizing views and change the way they approach polarizing topics.
Edit to add:
The last line of this post originally finished with,
"You either 'get it' or you don't".
Implying that people who are of a polarized mindset don't "get it"
and people who have outgrown the need for a polarized mindset do "Get it".
Then I realized after I posted it that this statement was in itself POLARIZING!!!!
You either get it or you don't???
Agghhh, this polarizing mindset ensnares even the most astute obsevers of this phenomenon sometimes.
So, in the interest of fair play I am outing myself and letting everyone know that I am human too.edit on 10-10-2011 by Screwed because: (no reason given)
and there you have it, nothing is ever going to change......you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
Originally posted by Open2Truth
"The control of a large force is the same principle as the control of a few men: it is merely a question of dividing up their numbers." Sun Tzu, The Art of War.
And divide us they have. Fighting - between political parties, ideologies, religions, classes, countries, sexes, ethnicities - has become such an accepted way of life that it is seen by many as an inevitable and necessary part of the process for change. It is far from it. It is the one sure way to ensure that nothing of great import changes at all. And that benefits none of us.
S&F for an insightful thread and glimpse at the bigger picture.
Originally posted by Logarock
In division one finds the balance of power, the natural course of a free society. The weakness of unification is that it is far to easy to be led by the few. Divison allows a clearer view of points and intentions, motives and platforms. Unification is to often the cry and hope of tyrants, the dream of demigods.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by MidnightTide
and there you have it, nothing is ever going to change......you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
Show me a picture of where a TPM defecated on a police car. Or, show me where TPM members wear ski masks to a meeting. Or show me where TPM members demanded that someone GIVE THEM a job. I'll wait.
< crickets >
Oh, you can't? There you have it. Bubblegum psychology never works, does it?
edit on 11-10-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)