ET UFOs are Not Real , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 04:49 PM by gimme_some_truth
Ladies and Gentleman, Rigel has admitted to ignoring the evidence in this thread.

Claiming that the fact that the best of the best could not rule out ET in 646 cases, is not evidence of anything...

The evidence lies in Project Bluebook. A copy of which can be found here:

www.theblackvault.com...


It shows a list of all UFO sightings they investigated. 10,147 UFO sightings and investigations between 1947 and 1965. Now, the US government was able to find a logical explanation for most of these sightings. How ever. 646 remain unidentified.

They were unable to find explanations for these.... and unable to rule out ET.

This is Evidence, despite Rigel's not wanting it to be...


Hmm....

Clearly Rigel is looking to pick on believers and for that I say, shame on them.

They made a bet that they would ban themselves if any evidence was presented, so clearly they have a reason to deny any and all evidence.

I am leaving this thread and for the reasons stated above, I encourage everyone else to walk out on it as well.

Good day.
edit on 9-10-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 04:51 PM by rigel4
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Ladies and Gentleman, Rigel has admitted to ignoring the evidence in this thread.

Claiming that the fact that the best of the best could not rule out ET in 646 cases, is not evidence of anything...

The evidence lies in Project Bluebook. A copy of which can be found here:

www.theblackvault.com...


It shows a list of all UFO sightings they investigated. 10,147 UFO sightings and investigations between 1947 and 1965. Now, the US government was able to find a logical explanation for most of these sightings. How ever. 646 remain unidentified.

They were unable to find explanations for these.... and unable to rule out ET.

This is Evidence, despite Rigel's not wanting it to be...


Hmm....

Clearly Rigel is looking to pick on believers and for that I say, shame on them.

I am leaving this thread and for the reasons stated above, I encourage everyone else to walk out on it as well.

Good day.




No

I said project blue book couldn't provide evidence of ET craft.
Walking out is simply losing the argument.
you cant provide irrefutable evidence , because there is no irrefutable evidence.
edit on 9-10-2011 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 04:57 PM by ShedAlert
reply to post by rigel4

i think my last post came off as too bias. i personally believe in aliens visiting earth, although i do understand that there isn't conclusive evidence, and it would be silly to say that it's fact. all of what you said in your OP were completely true apart from your own bias in your conclusion.

on your 'a man should not be hung without conclusive evidence' isn't in the same context. if you had many witnesses of the killings, although the witnesses cannot give 100% factual evidence he was there, would you let the man go? personally, i would not kill him, but monitor what he does next. do you get what i am saying?


reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 04:59 PM by Watts
[Imgur](i.imgur.com...)

Thread is pointless, nobody is going to go out their way to "prove you wrong" as if you're some sort of special authority in the world that needs to be persuaded for this phenomenon to be substantiated.
edit on 9-10-2011 by Watts because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 05:00 PM by steveknows
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Ladies and Gentleman, Rigel has admitted to ignoring the evidence in this thread.

Claiming that the fact that the best of the best could not rule out ET in 646 cases, is not evidence of anything...

The evidence lies in Project Bluebook. A copy of which can be found here:

www.theblackvault.com...


It shows a list of all UFO sightings they investigated. 10,147 UFO sightings and investigations between 1947 and 1965. Now, the US government was able to find a logical explanation for most of these sightings. How ever. 646 remain unidentified.

They were unable to find explanations for these.... and unable to rule out ET.

This is Evidence, despite Rigel's not wanting it to be...


Hmm....

Clearly Rigel is looking to pick on believers and for that I say, shame on them.

They made a bet that they would ban themselves if any evidence was presented, so clearly they have a reason to deny any and all evidence.

I am leaving this thread and for the reasons stated above, I encourage everyone else to walk out on it as well.

Good day.
edit on 9-10-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)



Not ruling out ET is not proof of ET.
edit on 9-10-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 05:02 PM by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by rigel4


Walking out is simply losing the argument.
you cant provide irrefutable evidence , because there is no irrefutable evidence.
edit on 9-10-2011 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)


Then refute my evidence! Don't just claim it is not evidence. If it can be refuted than refute it... Don't just ignore it.

There was no argument. Only you admitting to admitting to ignoring posts... which you only spoke about after I insisted you do so.

Fact is You have not refuted my evidence, you have simply ignored it and then said it was not evidence.

You are looking to pick on believers and for that I say, shame on you.

THIS is why I am walking out of this thread.

I am walking out because you have admitted to ignoring evidence.

You have not even bothered to try and refute the evidence I suggested, you made a blanket statement saying it is not evidence.

This is laughable at best. I think you cannot refute my evidence.

The fact is between 1947 and 1965, 10,147 were investigated by the best of the best. 646 of these investigations were unable to find an earthly explanation. 646 of these were unable to rule out something as simple as them being ET air craft.

Like it or not, this is evidence of UFO's.

Now, yes, I am walking out on your thread. If you need to tell yourself that I lost an argument in order to make yourself feel better, be my guest.

Be it known, however, that you have not refuted my evidence at all. You simply ignored it. You simply called it not evidence after my insisting that you acknowledge my post.

And your whole, ignoring my post because it is not evidence, claim, is BS anyway. Why? Because you have responded to other posts with out ignoring them, trying to refute them...

So you are now caught in a lie.

Call it what you like. Hey if you want to say I lost this non existent argument ( Non existent because you flat out ignored my evidence and never once attempted to refute it), them be my guest.

Everyone else can see reality though and reality is, I presented evidence that you cannot refute....

Don't worry, I don't expect you to ban yourself though....

Not that you ever would have done so.

You made this thread in order to pick on believers and you do not care at all about any evidence and have straight up admitted to ignoring evidence... Though your real reasons are obvious... You can't refute it... If you could, you would have done so by now.

THIS is why I am leaving this thread. I will not argue with some one unwilling to examine all evidence....

Shame on you for ignoring evidence. Shame on you for not attempting to even refute it and just saying, it is not evidence and blowing it off. Shame on you for making a thread with the purpose of picking on believers.

Shame on you.

Call it what you like I will not take part in your picking on believers. And THAT is why I wont be back... but hey... Keep telling yourself that you won something.



Lots of respect has been lost for you, with this thread.

Shame on you.
edit on 9-10-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 05:06 PM by rigel4
Originally posted by Watts
[Imgur](
i.imgur.com...)

Thread is pointless, nobody is going to go out their way to "prove you wrong" as if you're some sort of special authority in the world that needs to be persuaded for this phenomenon to be substantiated.
edit on 9-10-2011 by Watts because: (no reason given)


Thanks for you ringput.

However, is it any more pointless than a blurry you tube vid,
claiming " This is it" A real UFO "This is the One".
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 3 days ago with 57 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 11 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 17 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 11 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags