It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lisa Irwin - Missing - One Year Later

page: 131
41
<< 128  129  130    132  133  134 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 02:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy

Originally posted by Dav1d



One of the things the police here has done, is collect evidence. They have forensic evidence of where she was. Did the KCPD, get evidence of where the family cars had been? Of where Deborah's shoes had been?
edit on 19-11-2011 by Dav1d because: (no reason given)


This is interesting. From what we have been showed and have seen on live views, there was forensic evidence taken. As far as the questions about the cars and the shoes, I guess we will not know until the case is resolved (if there are no orders prohibiting the releasing of information). Unless someone here has been working with the local police and FBI, we can only speculate if the two items above were probed.

IWOH


We have a much smaller police force here, who has the foresight to take samples, in the hopes of ruling things out one would presume. And this case is not resolved. That police department went around and got video tape, from other communities in the hope of finding this child. I asked many pages ago if KCPD made this effort, and have been told many times since then that this suggestion was foolish (my characterization)
yet having been told that police did look at video from say the Airport might give credence to the fact that Lisa was not on a plane?

It appears that at least one reporter went around and checked video tape from gas stations in the area and found something. That that person found something suggest that this **might** be an area that KCPD choose not to explore. Again an apparent contrast in this case with another child abduction...




posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Dav1d
 



We have a much smaller police force here,


WRONG. AGAIN. Unless you are talking about where YOU live, which, since you have said it's a podunk place, is NOT Aurora, you are WRONG.

Aurora is adjacent to CHICAGO! It is CONNECTED. A SUBURB. PART of the Greater Chicago Metro area. I've been there many times, and recently!

Uggg. Spewing disinfo again. I mean, STILL.

Aurora is a city in the U.S. state of Illinois. Part of the Chicago metropolitan area, its estimated population in 2009 was 172,950. The city officially adopted the nickname "The City of Lights" in 1908, because it was one of the first cities in the United States to implement an all-electric street lighting system in 1881. - All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License‎ - Wikipedia


edit on 19-11-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 02:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by CREAM
This is a tragic story, but lets not forget that there is a kidnapping everyday in the US. About 2-3 average per day in Mexico(scary considering Mexico has 1/3 the population of the US). Not trying to downplay this story, but there are many tragic stories like this that happen all of the time the don't get picked up in the media, but those people should still be remembered in our hearts. Oh, when was the last time you heard about a missing black girl?


Actually I posted about Jahessye Shockley just a few days ago on this thread.



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Dav1d
 



We have a much smaller police force here,


WRONG. AGAIN. Unless you are talking about where YOU live, which, since you have said it's a podunk place, is NOT Aurora, you are WRONG.

Aurora is adjacent to CHICAGO! It is CONNECTED. A SUBURB. PART of the Greater Chicago Metro area. I've been there many times, and recently!

Uggg. Spewing disinfo again. I mean, STILL.

Aurora is a city in the U.S. state of Illinois. Part of the Chicago metropolitan area, its estimated population in 2009 was 172,950. The city officially adopted the nickname "The City of Lights" in 1908, because it was one of the first cities in the United States to implement an all-electric street lighting system in 1881. - All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License‎ - Wikipedia


edit on 19-11-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)


I'm sure that Chief Thomas and his command staff, will be delighted to know they are a part of the Chicago police Department...

You might want to vist their web site, then again perhaps not.


The 152,000-square-foot .quarters will house the department’s 300 officers and close to 100 civilian employees, and features the most advanced technology available for crime-fighting today. It will replace the .quarters currently located at 350 N. River St., which was built in 1966 and designed for around 100 police officers-- the size of Aurora’s force at that time.
Read more:


Unless of course it is contention that KCPD is smaller?

edit on 19-11-2011 by Dav1d because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by CREAM
 


There is actually a missing black girl right now named Jahassey , pronounced JESSI, that I've been following a bit as well. It's very sad. Very early in this thread we addressed this and it was asked if only little blue eyed blond babies make the news. The little blue eyed blond baby boy this week who was beaten to death by his mother didn't make the news. Because of a PENN STATE child rape scandal that is dominating the news. I didn't see ONE blip on national news about baby Tyler Dashers' death. Did anyone? So it's not the skin color or age of a child that determines whether or not they get air time. It's whether or not it's a slow news day or a sensational enough case to waste the media's time reporting on. TKS MEDIA !



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by schmae
Earlier I said let's try to see all the untruths the media has said and it was mentioned there is no way to know. SO how about if we ONLY take what has come from deb and jeremys' MOUTH. It was the lawyers for irwins who said 'we'll do a press conference daily' and then did not and the lawyers who said ' the boys will interview next week' and then did not and again the next week and then did not. See where I'm going with this? Deb 's own statements were confusing and contradictory but if we remove all her lawyers, past and present , said since that , it's made it seem MUCH worse. It's the media and the family's own LAWYERS who are making them appear so guilty? Yes Deb did herself no favors with her statements about drinking, timeline, black out etc, but that really only makes her look careless and negligent. Isn't it the lawyers going back and forth and issuing lots of NON statmenents that have made her look more GUILTY?

And if so , is that accidental? Won't JOE T look like that much more skilled and awesome an attorney if he can get her acquitted from the edge of the abyss, where he may have put her himself?
edit on 19-11-2011 by schmae because: (no reason given)


Forgive me for butting in here but I think I see why David responded the way he did. In your post you comment about the boys' interviews being delayed several times as if the lawyers were the reason for the delay. They were not, the FBI was the reason for the delay. So by stating that about the interview delays making them appear more guilty it is bringing LE into the post since they were the delay not the lawyers.

Sorry if I've butted in out of turn.



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by wildtimes
 





It was brought to my attention that the Jon-Benet Ramsey case time-line has much in common with this Irwin case. I'm going to look into it and see what I can find in similarities.


I see no similarities at all with these two cases.


edit on 19-11-2011 by gabby2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 04:39 PM
link   
reply to post by wildtimes
 





Okay? You are wasting all of our time, and you have FAR PASSED the point of redeeming yourself IN MY OPINION.


Please speak for yourself if you decide to chastise some member with your silly accusations.

David has brought a different set of eyes, and fresh viewpoints to this thread. Is he not allowed to raise concern and awareness over what could potentially be very sloppy detective work?

Is that not caring about Lisa..like so many of you say you do? If the police are overlooking some obvious leads..and handling the case badly.. who suffers for that the most? An innocent child.




edit on 19-11-2011 by gabby2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Dav1d
 


Last effort here, Dav1d, to deny the ignorance in your claims.
The Pitzen case happened in on May 11.

This article is from May 18.

Feds Join Search For Missing Aurora Boy



May 18, 2011 9:03 AM
AURORA, Ill. (WBBM/CBS) – The hunt for a missing 6-year-old Aurora boy has intensified, with involvement now from the feds.
...Now, the FBI and U.S. Marshal’s office have joined in the hunt.

New agents join a specialized missing children team dispatched Monday, which already includes investigators from Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin. CBS 2′s Kristyn Hartman reports.


Look it up. "Massive searches", several cities involved, several counties involved, the Chicago Tribune reporting, fliers and pictures plastered all over the midwest. And you are implying that this litte police department is all on their own. I'm not going to do your homework for you. I'm not going to argue with you either.

And I reserve the right to challenge every post you submit that contains misrepresentation..and disinformation.

EDIT TO ADD THE LINK: chicago.cbslocal.com...

edit on 19-11-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Dav1d
 


Last effort here, Dav1d, to deny the ignorance in your claims.
The Pitzen case happened in on May 11.

This article is from May 18.

Feds Join Search For Missing Aurora Boy



May 18, 2011 9:03 AM
AURORA, Ill. (WBBM/CBS) – The hunt for a missing 6-year-old Aurora boy has intensified, with involvement now from the feds.
...Now, the FBI and U.S. Marshal’s office have joined in the hunt.

New agents join a specialized missing children team dispatched Monday, which already includes investigators from Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin. CBS 2′s Kristyn Hartman reports.


Look it up. "Massive searches", several cities involved, several counties involved, the Chicago Tribune reporting, fliers and pictures plastered all over the midwest. And you are implying that this litte police department is all on their own. I'm not going to do your homework for you. I'm not going to argue with you either.

And I reserve the right to challenge every post you submit that contains misrepresentation..and disinformation.




Certainly challenge my post, I would never expect you to acknowledge when you are wrong! LOL Even click on the link perhaps, and check out the number to call? I'm sure that is a direct line to what? The FBI? The Chicago police? Or AURORA city police? But that can't be can it? After all you **imply** that it is part of Chicago.... Hmm whom is the **lead** here? Who's department is listed in the stories?

But of course that doesn't support your spin does it? So by all means continue to post, continue to show us how much more intellegent you are!

I'm sure we all feel warm and welcome here now, free to discuss our thoughts.



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
I glanced back at the NBC reporters page for a minute and found this was linked on it now:

$300 Baby Lisa kidnap rumor denied by teen who supposedly implicated handyman in disappearance

Not much to read on it except a short description of the .line. I will see if I can find anything else.

*Edit - on his facebook page he quotes the teen as:


Teen: "I haven't seen Jersey since a couple weeks before all this happened.


NBC Reporters Face Book page

IWOH


edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Clarification of the Teen reported by NBC News



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy
I glanced back at the NBC reporters page for a minute and found this was linked on it now:

$300 Baby Lisa kidnap rumor denied by teen who supposedly implicated handyman in disappearance

Not much to read on it except a short description of the .line. I will see if I can find anything else.

*Edit - on his facebook page he quotes the teen as:


Teen: "I haven't seen Jersey since a couple weeks before all this happened.


NBC Reporters Face Book page

IWOH


edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Clarification of the Teen reported by NBC News


So curious how are you reading/hearing this? Just which teen do you believe this to be? (1) The teen that heard it alledgedly from Jersey's mouth? (2) The teen that reported hearing this from a friend that heard it from Jersey? (3) Someone else?

Thanks,

*Edit the only way this makes sense to me is if the teen was told this before the crime.... If Jeresy had preknowledge of it... In that light his quote is kind of interesting in what it doesn't say...

edit on 19-11-2011 by Dav1d because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy
I glanced back at the NBC reporters page for a minute and found this was linked on it now:

$300 Baby Lisa kidnap rumor denied by teen who supposedly implicated handyman in disappearance

Not much to read on it except a short description of the .line. I will see if I can find anything else.

*Edit - on his facebook page he quotes the teen as:


Teen: "I haven't seen Jersey since a couple weeks before all this happened.


NBC Reporters Face Book page

IWOH


edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Clarification of the Teen reported by NBC News


I strongly believe that any street people who have info(homeless circles)..will either be bought off.. or scared of the consequences of stepping into the spotlight with info..

After all who wants everything they say..their past dug up. thrown back in their face.. dragged through the slime by the media and the public as well as prosecuting attorneys.

They have to implicate friends which may not want them to as well..

With this case its like being thrown to the vultures an dissected piece to piece..not to mention your family and friends.


edit on 19-11-2011 by gabby2011 because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-11-2011 by gabby2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 05:52 PM
link   
I'm beginning to think that when the press calm down and get sick of this story, THEN we might find out what happened to baby Lisa. This -putting people on the world stage- thing, hounding them, surrounding their homes, and calling non-stop is something that's feared by most people, I think. Contrary to that -"they just want their photos in the paper" bull#.

I suppose we'll have to wait and see.



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dav1d

Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy
I glanced back at the NBC reporters page for a minute and found this was linked on it now:

$300 Baby Lisa kidnap rumor denied by teen who supposedly implicated handyman in disappearance

Not much to read on it except a short description of the .line. I will see if I can find anything else.

*Edit - on his facebook page he quotes the teen as:


Teen: "I haven't seen Jersey since a couple weeks before all this happened.


NBC Reporters Face Book page

IWOH


edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Clarification of the Teen reported by NBC News


So curious how are you reading/hearing this? Just which teen do you believe this to be? (1) The teen that heard it alledgedly from Jersey's mouth? (2) The teen that reported hearing this from a friend that heard it from Jersey? (3) Someone else?

Thanks,

*Edit the only way this makes sense to me is if the teen was told this before the crime.... If Jeresy had preknowledge of it... In that light his quote is kind of interesting in what it doesn't say...

edit on 19-11-2011 by Dav1d because: (no reason given)


The page I linked is now populated with a story, rather than just the "Skeleton" page as it was put by the reporter. The news is reporting it like they found the teen in question and asked the teen if they could confirm what was said by the lawyers. The following is from the news article:


He acknowledged discussing the possibility the Irwin neighborhood handyman named Jersey could be involved.

"I told someone, I was like (expletive), Jersey was the kind of person where you could say here, here’s $300, take care of this baby, and he would have done it," he said. "That’s all I’ve said. I haven’t seen Jersey since weeks before all this happened actually."


*Edit to add -- The reporter also posted this on his Facebook page"


Teen says a woman from either police or Irwin's legal team has already interviewed him: "She came up asking the same (expletive). I told her the same thing."


The way the article is written, it looks like NBC is saying they may have found the "Male Teen Friend" the girl heard the story from. This being the person supposedly hearing it from the handyman himself.

If this was the real person, it looks like it could have been mistranslated by the girl. Like the game where you tell someone something and they tell it to someone, and when it comes back to you it is completely changed.

Interesting.

IWOH
edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Clarification of paragraph

edit on 19-11-2011 by IwasOnceHappy because: Added Reporters Facbook posting



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy

*Edit to add -- The reporter also posted this on his Facebook page"


Teen says a woman from either police or Irwin's legal team has already interviewed him: "She came up asking the same (expletive). I told her the same thing."



I was thinking about this today after reading through some of Megan's interviews. Something I kind of glossed over at first but was thinking about today...in the back of my mind. As soon as you posted this IWOH, it triggered what had stuck out to me in Megan Wright's interview. Did anyone else notice this near the end of the interview

Ron Rugen interviewing Megan Wright

Rugen: Has anybody from the Bradley/Irwin family, Stanton, or Tacopina, visited with you about what you know?
Wright: If I had any information, believe me, I'd put it on blast. I'm not in this for money. Just wanting to do anything and everything in my power to help. Nope. Short and Short. That's about it .
Rugen: Cyndy Short, or a detective for them?
Wright: Cyndy Short and her sister Mary K.
Rugen: Is her sister Mary an attorney?
Wright: I spoke with Mary K many times, and she brought her sister, Cyndy the last time I spoke with her in person.
Rugen: When was that?
Wright: I'm not sure. I'll check her business card. Be right back… "Mary K. Poirier. Mitigation Specialist. The McCallister Law Firm, P.C." That was a few days before moving out of the house.
Rugen: Are you sure about the date on that? Because wasn't Cyndy Short no longer representing the family a few weeks before you moved out? Didn’t you move out last week?
Wright: Yes, they were still working, even though they were not on the investigation any more.
Rugen: Did they say why?
Wright: It was the right thing to do.


And now this teen stating a woman questioned him...perhaps Short? I don't know if there are any women on the legal team currently...unless they are assistants to Picerno.

I was going to post a few days ago that I was really disgusted with Short because she had to make such a huge media deal about "still trying to find Baby Lisa even though i'm off the case...." I thought she was just trying to take on the martyr role and she probably finished the media interview and never once thought about Baby Lisa again. But here we find (if Megan is to be believed and I don't see what the benefit would be to Megan to lie about Short visiting her) that Short is behind the scenes investigating.....that says SO much to me about her character....I take back my past judgements of her. If she indeed was looking for kudos....she would be putting herself much more in the spotlight....wonder if she's found anything worthwhile yet?

Michelle
edit on 19-11-2011 by Michelle129th because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by wigit
 





Contrary to that -"they just want their photos in the paper" bull#.


yeah..I forgot about the people wanting those 15 minutes.. or even the reward money.

Probably more that would be willing to make something up.. then those who would shy away

..but I imagine anyone knowing something , and perhaps being involved with circles that may be into a variety of illegal activities wouldn't be to eager to step forward with info...if they had some.



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Michelle129th
 





I was going to post a few days ago that I was really disgusted with Short because she had to make such a huge media deal about "still trying to find Baby Lisa even though i'm off the case...." I thought she was just trying to take on the martyr role and she probably finished the media interview and never once thought about Baby Lisa again. But here we find (if Megan is to be believed and I don't see what the benefit would be to Megan to lie about Short visiting her) that Short is behind the scenes investigating.....that says SO much to me about her character....I take back my past judgements of her. If she indeed was looking for kudos....she would be putting herself much more in the spotlight....wonder if she's found anything worthwhile yet?


Wow..isn't that illegal for her to go fishing like that now that she is off the case..?

Hmmm..makes you wonder why she decided to do this case pro bono ?..why she got kicked off?..and why shes still poking her nose in it ? ..and is she even allow to tamper with possible witnesses in that way?

hasn't there been enough witness tampering ?..
what is going on here ..and why?



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabby2011
reply to post by Michelle129th
 





I was going to post a few days ago that I was really disgusted with Short because she had to make such a huge media deal about "still trying to find Baby Lisa even though i'm off the case...." I thought she was just trying to take on the martyr role and she probably finished the media interview and never once thought about Baby Lisa again. But here we find (if Megan is to be believed and I don't see what the benefit would be to Megan to lie about Short visiting her) that Short is behind the scenes investigating.....that says SO much to me about her character....I take back my past judgements of her. If she indeed was looking for kudos....she would be putting herself much more in the spotlight....wonder if she's found anything worthwhile yet?


Wow..isn't that illegal for her to go fishing like that now that she is off the case..?

Hmmm..makes you wonder why she decided to do this case pro bono ?..why she got kicked off?..and why shes still poking her nose in it ? ..and is she even allow to tamper with possible witnesses in that way?

hasn't there been enough witness tampering ?..
what is going on here ..and why?


Good Questions. I looked up her bio at her law firm. Very interesting how she is described. If she is still searching for baby Lisa (I believe when she gave her interview after being taken off, she said she would still search as a concerned citizen), it would fit her profile at this link:

Attorney Short

IWOH



posted on Nov, 19 2011 @ 08:15 PM
link   

Witness tampering is harming or otherwise threatening a witness, hoping to influence his or her testimony. In the United States, the crime of witness tampering in federal cases is defined by statute at 18 U.S.C. § 1512, "Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant". The punishment for such an offense is up to 20 years if physical force was used or attempted, and up to 10 years if physical force was only threatened. The tampering need not have actually been successful in order for it to be criminal.
Source:



That doesn't seem like what Short was doing....



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 128  129  130    132  133  134 >>

log in

join