It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by silo13
I have a very hard time believing Deb killed her outright. I do not believe she did. I believe an accidental death occurred and maybe no one even realized it was a death at the time..........like too much cough syrup or a tumble from the bed, etc. Possibly someone, Deb, maybe, thought OH NO she fell out of bed, but looked at her and she appeared ok but then later on succumbed to swelling or something. I mean, I don't know. There's loads of possible things, but I do not believe an INTENTIONAL murder occurred . I've never believed it and will not unless mom confesses out right. Possibly rolling over on baby, but I don't buy that . It's a big baby to roll over on and she would squeal and struggle to get free. An innocent enough accident that got out of control in the cover up phase possibly because they were drinking and worried about that.
I still think Jeremy had nothing to do with it, expect POSSIBLY in cover up only, but not there at the time Lisa became ' lost' . I dont' even really think he had much to do with a cover up.
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by gabby2011
What does going back to 100% normal mean to a family who's lost a baby ? I just find it odd wording and again I don't necessarily think it's from the irwins mouths. Just remember the crack cyndy short was talking? I just wonder if a LOT of the family's image problem is from the IDIOTS around them opening their mouth. Like the lawyer's using past tense of Lisa, etc.
And if so , is that accidental? Won't JOE T look like that much more skilled and awesome an attorney if he can get her acquitted from the edge of the abyss, where he may have put her himself?
For the moment Taco's still at milking the cash cow. At first it gave pure sweet cream. Now it's down to plane old milk. Soon, when it starts to thin? You'll see him change. But not...quite....yet...
Sickening isn't it.
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by gabby2011
You gotta admit if Deb said we are doing better every day and cant wait to be back to 100% normal, it would be a statement akin to Lisa will never be found and we know this ! That's why I hope she didn't say that and someone with some sense needs to screen what these lawyers say before they jsut start spewing.
Originally posted by schmae
Earlier I said let's try to see all the untruths the media has said and it was mentioned there is no way to know. SO how about if we ONLY take what has come from deb and jeremys' MOUTH. It was the lawyers for irwins who said 'we'll do a press conference daily' and then did not and the lawyers who said ' the boys will interview next week' and then did not and again the next week and then did not. See where I'm going with this?
Yeah. Talk about "unsavory." I was ridiculed/mocked for saying this before, but...."you are known by the company you keep." Looking at Deborah's and Bradley's 'company', both socially, and in this situation, is, well, to me glaringly indicative of what "we the public" are not privy to. The cast of characters (excluding the children) is pretty uh...colorful. But it's all speculation on my part.
Originally posted by gabby2011
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by gabby2011
You gotta admit if Deb said we are doing better every day and cant wait to be back to 100% normal, it would be a statement akin to Lisa will never be found and we know this ! That's why I hope she didn't say that and someone with some sense needs to screen what these lawyers say before they jsut start spewing.
yes I totally agree.. the lawyers need to start using some common sense in what they spew to the public.
Its a sad day if the parents have to defend what they have said to a lawyer..and how he has misquoted them.
I don't know what this lawyers agenda is, but I do think that parents such as Debbie and Jeremy who are being attacked by the public as well as the media.. would be easy to manipulate into accepting a high profile lawyer to help them with this case.
Originally posted by Dav1d
Originally posted by schmae
Earlier I said let's try to see all the untruths the media has said and it was mentioned there is no way to know. SO how about if we ONLY take what has come from deb and jeremys' MOUTH. It was the lawyers for irwins who said 'we'll do a press conference daily' and then did not and the lawyers who said ' the boys will interview next week' and then did not and again the next week and then did not. See where I'm going with this?
So where is the acknowledgment that LE requested at least one delay in the interview, so that they could fly in their specialist questioner? On one hand we are to believe everything LE tells us. We are NOT to question what they present to us. It is acknowledge that LE can and does lie to us, that LE can selectively withhold information from us, and yet we are to believe them? The question becomes one of whom does one give the benefit of doubt to?
I also still think if the mum had anything to do with causing the baby harm and this is all a cover up by her, then she must be a master at covering her tracks.
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by gabby2011
You gotta admit if Deb said we are doing better every day and cant wait to be back to 100% normal, it would be a statement akin to Lisa will never be found and we know this ! That's why I hope she didn't say that and someone with some sense needs to screen what these lawyers say before they jsut start spewing.
Only if you continue to keep their company AFTER you have found out. And that is certainly NOT the case with these folks based on what we do know about their socializing (which isn't much except for the porch-party, and the reports of former Ft Bragg acquaintances who knew Deborah)
If you are going out to lunch with a coworker everyday for years, and find out at some point hes a sick creep involved with things you were never aware of..does that make you "known by the company you keep" by all those who saw you dine together everyday at lunch for the last 10 years?
Originally posted by wildtimes
In the interest of disabusing those of you interested in this case of the media hysteria and out-of-context declarations regarding Lisa's hometown, for the beneft of her, her family, and the city's reputation in general, I want to urge everyone interested in this case to do their own, independent research into Greater Kansas City, and in particular the difference between Kansas City MO, and North Kansas City, MO.
Much of the disinformation being spewed in this thread is egregiously and spectacularly inaccurate. One of my biggest frustrations with ATS is that there are members who, rather than denying ignorance, SPREAD IT, and refuse to become educated about it or acknowledge when they are proven mistaken. This thread, regarding the life of a child, should NOT be one in which that occurs.
These points in particular I want to make clear:
North Kansas City, MO lies in Clay County, MO. This is where Lisa's family lives.
Kansas City MO proper is in Jackson County. THIS is where there are some very dicey and dangerous neighborhoods that are overrun by gangs, plagued by murders and drugs and all those despicable acts of gangbangers and their ilk, and where the population (in those blighted areas) refuse to provide witnesses of homicide to police due to their fear of retaliation -- that is, being murdered by the murderers against whom they testify or depose. Included in this urban-core, problem-ridden group are some parts of the Northeast Area (NOT near "North Kansas City")...Independence...the East Side...the Upper Westside, and Lower Midtown.
Kansas City Police spokesman Steve Young said early on that he believes people in the community know what happened to Baby Lisa and hopes someone will come forward.
www.wptv.com...
Bob Lowery of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children told the AP he believes that "someone out there knows what happened to baby Lisa.
"Someone could have seen something and is reluctant to call police," Lowery said. "That person needs to come forward and share that with the Kansas City Police Department. Hardly ever has there been a scenario like this where someone doesn't know."
www.radaronline.com...
"If you have a homicide and you had 50 witnesses and not one witness wants to cooperate, we have to look at what we're doing," said Forté.
www.kctv5.com...
Again, this brings up their choice (or rather "acceptance" and "dismissal") of "help". Of the myriad options they had, they went with some NYC sleazy defense attorney (my adjective -- my opinion) rather than a local, respected, and proven upstanding attorney.
Originally posted by wildtimes
Just my opinion.
Oh, and btw, the ridicule came from someone who briefly stepped in weeks ago, immediately got very nasty, and has long since stopped posting.
edit on 19-11-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)