It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OldCorp
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but the whole "Elenin dimmed because it broke up" story is BULLOCKS.
Think about this for a second: Where does the coma of a comet come from?
The coma is formed by explosive outgassing of ice crystals that reflect sunlight. With me so far?
The outgassing occurs when the Sun's rays melt the ice on the surface correct?
What happens when a "comet" breaks up? The exposed surface area increases exponentially, so there should be much more outgassing, causing a BRIGHTER comet.
If I'm wrong, somebody please point out how.
Originally posted by shinzaun
Originally posted by OldCorp
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but the whole "Elenin dimmed because it broke up" story is BULLOCKS.
Think about this for a second: Where does the coma of a comet come from?
The coma is formed by explosive outgassing of ice crystals that reflect sunlight. With me so far?
The outgassing occurs when the Sun's rays melt the ice on the surface correct?
What happens when a "comet" breaks up? The exposed surface area increases exponentially, so there should be much more outgassing, causing a BRIGHTER comet.
If I'm wrong, somebody please point out how.
VERY VERY VERY good point! So what you are implying is the fact it has gone dim is because the exterior coating of ice that causes the tail has melted away, leaving the solid core of the comet. Next question what is the core made from? My guess is a material never before discovered.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Since I'm not Superman with supervision, or a rich man with my own huge telescope, I can't say what it is; only what it isn't.
Originally posted by OldCorp
And it isn't what we've been told it is. And I'm going to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in the next few days.
Originally posted by CrikeyMagnet
Sorry...but... when they say 40x10 and 10x10, is that saying that the first image is 40 stacked 10 second exposures, and the second is 10 stacked 10 second exposures? Doesn't that put the first image (as a baseline) 4 times the exposure of the second? (Assuming the same aperture, et al.)
I mean... I'm no photographer, but... No wait, I guess I am a photographer.
Originally posted by ker2010
Who cares the comet poses no threat.
Once this weekend passes and comet elenin is finally shown to be no threat all the people hyping it will not admit how foolish they are no one is ever held accountable for the crap they spew on ATS and thats why it keeps getting spewed. Same people will show up during next doom and gloom phase rinse and repeat. I wish their were a 3 strike rule on ats for this crap, 3 strikes on your predictions of doom your perma banned. It would really weed out the foolish theory's and you-tube scientist. LOL
Originally posted by deadeyedick
Originally posted by ker2010
Who cares the comet poses no threat.
Once this weekend passes and comet elenin is finally shown to be no threat all the people hyping it will not admit how foolish they are no one is ever held accountable for the crap they spew on ATS and thats why it keeps getting spewed. Same people will show up during next doom and gloom phase rinse and repeat. I wish their were a 3 strike rule on ats for this crap, 3 strikes on your predictions of doom your perma banned. It would really weed out the foolish theory's and you-tube scientist. LOL
At this point it being a threat or not is not whats at stake.However the fact that there is no solid proof to know if it broke up or not yet they tell us to blindly accept what they say is proof even though it is full of holes.I think everyone here is smart enough to see the facts that we really don't know.
At the exact point that it was closest to the sun it just so happens to be in a posisition that visibility becomes near impossible.Also near the same time that it falls into the closest point to the earth we get nasa telling us that 10-300 lb chunks of debris will fall to earth and the higher ups go underground.
It seems very sad to me that were not blasting that satellite to shreds before it lands on top of one of our nuke power plants or something worse like my freaking head.It is very clear to me that when kansas went bye bye so did our commonsensacial leadership.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
At the exact point that it was closest to the sun it just so happens to be in a posisition that visibility becomes near impossible.Also near the same time that it falls into the closest point to the earth we get nasa telling us that 10-300 lb chunks of debris will fall to earth and the higher ups go underground.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by OldCorp
Since I'm not Superman with supervision, or a rich man with my own huge telescope, I can't say what it is; only what it isn't.
Actually, without a degree and a decent telescope, you can't tell us either.
Originally posted by OldCorp
And it isn't what we've been told it is. And I'm going to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in the next few days.
You're going to prove what exactly? What methods will you use? You seem somewhat vague to say the least...
IRM
Originally posted by pazcat
reply to post by The Old American
The level of stacking or exposures really make no difference at all except in giving the pictures more detail, it doesn't affect the brightness of the comet in the picture. That part is set in stone. The reason we stack many long exposures is to bring out the detail that is only very faint, the magnitude of the object will not change no matter how many times you stack it, it won't appear any brighter, the mag is a constant.edit on 23-9-2011 by pazcat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ker2010
Originally posted by deadeyedick
Originally posted by ker2010
Who cares the comet poses no threat.
Once this weekend passes and comet elenin is finally shown to be no threat all the people hyping it will not admit how foolish they are no one is ever held accountable for the crap they spew on ATS and thats why it keeps getting spewed. Same people will show up during next doom and gloom phase rinse and repeat. I wish their were a 3 strike rule on ats for this crap, 3 strikes on your predictions of doom your perma banned. It would really weed out the foolish theory's and you-tube scientist. LOL
At this point it being a threat or not is not whats at stake.However the fact that there is no solid proof to know if it broke up or not yet they tell us to blindly accept what they say is proof even though it is full of holes.I think everyone here is smart enough to see the facts that we really don't know.
At the exact point that it was closest to the sun it just so happens to be in a posisition that visibility becomes near impossible.Also near the same time that it falls into the closest point to the earth we get nasa telling us that 10-300 lb chunks of debris will fall to earth and the higher ups go underground.
It seems very sad to me that were not blasting that satellite to shreds before it lands on top of one of our nuke power plants or something worse like my freaking head.It is very clear to me that when kansas went bye bye so did our commonsensacial leadership.
I want pics of higher ups going underground.... Cmon we have some Denver folks on ATS.. Some of you go to the DIA airport and see do you see lines of famous people , or politicians lining up in mass there.
If the DIA gets shut down and they wont let the general public near it then something is def up and id be scared. But cmon this can be proven someone head to DIA this weekend and keep us posted on who and what you see!!!