It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by D8ncer
Investigators pore over the site of the nose-first, high speed-impact JF-104A crash that left this large crater in the desert near Edwards Air Force Base in December 1962. NASA test pilot Milton O.
Thompson ejected from this aircraft on Dec. 20, 1962, after an asymmetrical flap condition made the jet uncontrollable.
Actual high speed nose inpact by a jet fighter made this hole in the ground which is bigger than the crater shown in Shanksville.
My view is that had it been a large commercial airline, surely the crater at Shanksville, should have been huge.
i224.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
I still don't see how an explosion could have happened at Shanksville.
Well, if you can't figure out how a plane with thousands of gallons of jet fuel hitting the ground at 560 mph can explode then having the "crash details" ain't going to help you. You need some very, very basic science instruction.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Yes, can we get some 'official' dimensions and crash details?
Thanks in advanced.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Yes, can we get some 'official' dimensions and crash details?
Thanks in advanced.
As far as I know there are no "crash details" beyond what was read from the recording devices. There are no "official dimensions". Too bad.
So know what are you going to do?
www.unitedflight93.com...
"The plane left a crater 20 feet wide and 15 feet deep, churning up chunks of deep brown earth and scorching trees in the nearby woods." (11)
"Pittsburgh's WTAE-TV reporter Michelle Wright toured the crash scene and said that a crater of about 30 to 40 feet long, 15 to 20 feet wide and 18 feet deep was created by the crash." (9)
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Shadow Herder
The crater was measured at around 15-30 feet in diameter and no more that 15 feet deep.
YOU (and only YOU) on this Board keep repeating this (although the exact dimensions change...even NOW there is a 100% variation, base don YOUR OWN WORDS of "between 15-30 feet" in the "claimed" dimensions!! )
YET, when asked, repeatedly to CITE your source for hte claims...nothing. Zilch. Nada...
Sigh... how ignorant can you be considering how long you have been here and how many times you have seen the facts..... I will repeat what the first responders and actual eyewitnesses have seen in the flesh.
The Dayton Daily News of September 12, 2001, described the scene:
The impact of the crash left a crater estimated by authorities to be about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide. It appeared the plane first hit on the downward slope of a hillside [/ex
Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, said she was the first person to reach the crater. Lensbouer said that the crater was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described the sound as "an explosion, like an atomic bomb" -- not a crash.
Capt. Frank Monaco:
“The gouge was 8 to 10 feet deep and 15 to 20 feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police. “
(AP, 9/12/01 )
www.courier-journal.com...
FBI Special Agent Bill Crowley said the recorder was found at about 4:20 p.m. in the 8-foot-deep crater caused by the crash.
WPXI11 Pittsburgh
The plane left a crater 20 feet wide and 15 feet deep.
(Plain Dealer, 9/12/01)
Reporters said the crater was about 40 feet wide and more than 8 feet deep.
(Los Angeles Times, 9/12/01)
The impact of the crash left a crater estimated by authorities to be about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide.
(Cox, 9/12/01)
[I]“Pittsburgh's WTAE-TV reporter Michelle Wright toured the crash scene and said that a crater of about 30 to 40 feet long, 15 to 20 feet wide and 18 feet deep was created by the crash.”
www.newsnet5.com...
Ladies and gentlemen, the 3-4 resident debunkers here willfully ignore the facts and are hoping you people are stupid and will not believe eyewitnesses. They can only insult peoples intelligence, resort to name calling and hand waving when confronted with the facts.
Many people who were at the crash site said the crater was too small to have been caused by a Boeing 757 who's wing span is over 123 feet with a fuselage diameter of over 15 feet and tail height over 20 feet. The crater has been estimated to be no more than 15-30 feet which makes the conspiracy theory that a Boeing 757 (flight 93) caused that small crater when the eyewitnesses and common sense proves it not only absurd but impossible.
post-gazette.com...
described the area where the plane crashed as a former strip mine that is now a grassy field edged by woods. The plane came down near the tree line, he said.
Reporters were taken to the top of a nearby hill, overlooking a V-shaped gouge in the field. The gouge is 8- to 10-feet deep and 15- to 20-feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Poli
Thats exactly what you said the last time you were shown to be clueless and willfully ignorant over the subject.
Btw, your two links are bunk( dont work) and show nothing... Nice try. Talk about poor cherry picking. Weak.
I know why you are in such disbelief.
You tried so hard to make a Boeing 757 fit in a 30 foot hole so now you are calling people who were there liars because you failed to prove that the crater was caused by a boeing 757.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Are you telling us there is no official documents or information pertaining to the crash site in Shanksville?
Flight 93 could of been a surrogate cruise missile or a one man trainer but it was not a Boeing 757 that was said to have 'crashed' near stoystown penn
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Are you telling us there is no official documents or information pertaining to the crash site in Shanksville?
Flight 93 could of been a surrogate cruise missile or a one man trainer but it was not a Boeing 757 that was said to have 'crashed' near stoystown penn
I guess so, they all ran away.....edit on 6-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)edit on 6-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
When I have the time I will pull up posts from you and your sock puppets, hooper, when you admitted that those trenches were not caused by wings. You went to go as far as to say the reason why there are no wing scars is because the plane turned to "confetti" when the nose hit the ground so the wings never hit the ground...... (stupid I know ) I am just waiting for you to contradict yourself and comprimise the official story further before I drop the HAMMER on you.... again....
This is not your field.edit on 6-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hooper
I don't think the entirety of the wings through the whole span hit the ground. I may be wrong. But its a moot point.
HELLO??? That was the whole point.
The other poster is convinced that the wings left nice, tidy, weathered trenches the exact size of the wings of a Boeing 757.....
...like he lifted the dimensions from wikipedia
....and decided that a plane hitting the ground at 500+ mph would not disturb grass, ground and leave a nice tidy cartoon imprint of a plane.
You should correct your peers