It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lostjohnny
reply to post by SteveR
It's so much less scary when you can blame some poor, dark-skinned extremists who come from an eastern country you know nothing about, than some rich white-skinned extremists who live around the corner.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
This is so pathetic it's funny. I went back and read a couple more responses to my post. I won't read anymore of them, unless of course, I decide to read some more of them.
I asked a question, and made a comment, and have been called names, been insulted, invited to leave the country, and you name it. lol.
No wonder S.O. threatens to close this forum.............
The "explosive traces" or "thermite" claim comes from non-chemist Steven E. Jones
The provenience of the WTC dust sample is an apartment at 113 Cedar Street in New York City, NY.
A monument constructed primarily from structural steel from the WTC Towers located at Clarkson University in Potsdam, New York, is the source of previously-molten metal samples...
The samples were sent directly to Prof. Jones at BYU, and inspected by him and Dr. Jeffrey Farrer together, and analyzed by the BYU group.
worldtradecentertruth.com...
The line that "the samples were sent directly to Prof. Jones at BYU" is of concern, as it suggests an uncertain chain of custody. How sure can we be that Professor Jones' correspondent is accurately representing the origin of the samples? This need not be a hoax, just a simple error, and the entire basis of the study is destroyed.
There's a further problem in the comment that the metal samples came from a monument constructed "primarily" from WTC steel. Did some of it come from elsewhere, then? A quick search online revealed this:
Air Force ROTC cadets in the 536 Detachment salute World Trade Center beams as the National Anthem is played on Sept. 11, 2006, during a memorial ceremony at Clarkson University in Potsdam, N.Y. Clarkson alumnus Michael Bielawa, who supervised cleanup efforts at ground zero, donated three pieces of structural steel to the school, two of which were identified as part of the 55th floor of the south tower
www.cbsnews.com...
There are a number of things they claim with this photo. One is the timeline. They say the photo has firemen which means this was during the rescue operation which only lasted two weeks. Why would they have fireman after the rescue operations? This suggests to them that the cut on the columns were made very close to September 11. The suggestion here is that it was done during the collapse.
They claim that the angle of the cut can't be created by a welding tool and/or is designed to have the building fall in a certain direction.
The other is a yellow substance they claim is residue from a thermite reaction.
Let's examine these claims one by one to see where the evidence takes us...
Timeline and Firemen
The rescue operation took about two weeks. They figured anyone left alive would have died by then anyway, so they started clean up operations and body recovery. During this time there was always at least 50 policemen and 50 firemen left on the scene to recover their fallen brothers. There were even more than that on ground zero until the city of NY told them to leave in November 2001. The city couldn't justify risking the health of 150 police and fireman for body recovery. In fact there was a protest about it which ended with the mayor allowing 50 members of each department on the scene.
Citing safety concerns, Giuliani had sought to scale back the number of firefighters working at ground zero to 25. At one point there had been as many as 150 firefighters and police officers at the site.
The decision angered firefighters still mourning the loss of 343 colleagues in the attacks. Many bodies have not been recovered, and the firefighters said they wanted to help find the remains of their friends and colleagues.
The number of firefighters working at the site was increased to 50 on Thursday.
www.firehouse.com...
Below are photos of firemen well after September 11.
October
December 15th 2001
So the fact that there are firemen in the photo doesn't mean anything. That cut could have been done at any time during the clean up and recovery. Lets not forget the building went down some 6 stories underground. The firemen were recovering bodies mainly from the core and some were in the lobby when it happened. So it's not unreasonable to expect firemen there well after the event. Long enough for an ironworker to cut the column.
there exist NO peer-reviewed papers supporting controlled demolition, anywhere.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
So why not conduct another investigation and shut the millions of truthers up once and for all?
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
This is so pathetic it's funny. I went back and read a couple more responses to my post. I won't read anymore of them, unless of course, I decide to read some more of them.
I asked a question, and made a comment, and have been called names, been insulted, invited to leave the country, and you name it. lol.
No wonder S.O. threatens to close this forum.............
Originally posted by TrickoftheShadeI'm not sure it is. The conspiracy allows for the attacks to be calculated acts by evil white people. Horrifying, but ultimately preventable if we can just get rid of the evil ones, and understandable, because not the product of some amorphous racially mysterious other.
The conspiracy organises a complicated, messy situation into a nice neat one. And it means you don't have to wonder why people might hate you, or consider their differences, or think about lots of horrible complex global stuff. It makes a neat, narratively consistent package that provides closure. As such it's a much more comfortable viewpoint.
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Your point about the conspiracy being a nice simple little viewpoint is complete BS by the way. The conspiracy theory is at least if not more complicated than the OS and still involves international relations between almost every country. Your comparison is not valid.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
Whew, this is turned into a nasty little thread. Never posted on a 911 thread before.
Anyway, had multiple replies to my posts, and only read two. In response to those:
Colorado Jens: "Start packin' my bags", you say. Hm. I don't think so. I have no reason to leave but thanks for your concern. On the other hand, since you live in a country that is trying to kill you, perhaps you have greater concerns than I.
Old Timer: No, I don't believe everything I hear. Do you? You have given me the second ad hominid attack I've had in the time I've been here on ATS. I believe the first person stated I couldn't read, among other insults. Those things weren't true either, by the way. The thread, you understand, is not about the personal characteristics of ladyinwaiting,
I presume you have responded to my question of "why do you stay, if you think your country is capable of these crimes". You state you remain because you love the country. I can appreciate that. I love it too.
This concludes my participation in a 911 thread.
Have a nice evening, folks.
Originally posted by cripmeister
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Your point about the conspiracy being a nice simple little viewpoint is complete BS by the way. The conspiracy theory is at least if not more complicated than the OS and still involves international relations between almost every country. Your comparison is not valid.
I agree with TrickoftheShade and by simple I think he meant easier to understand. Also, many people probably feel better when they forget about al-Qaeda and point their finger at the government instead. The government is tangible, al-Qaeda on the other hand is still largely an unknown, a ghost that can strike anytime anywhere. In my opinion the Truther mentality can be viewed as a symptom of psychological denial.
edit on 16-9-2011 by cripmeister because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cecilofs
Originally posted by TrickoftheShadeI'm not sure it is. The conspiracy allows for the attacks to be calculated acts by evil white people. Horrifying, but ultimately preventable if we can just get rid of the evil ones, and understandable, because not the product of some amorphous racially mysterious other.
The conspiracy organises a complicated, messy situation into a nice neat one. And it means you don't have to wonder why people might hate you, or consider their differences, or think about lots of horrible complex global stuff. It makes a neat, narratively consistent package that provides closure. As such it's a much more comfortable viewpoint.
Here's the rub: If the OS is true, then the situation is quite simple. You stop invading other countries and bombing the # out of them. You stop raping their natural resources. You stop imposing your politics and/or religion onto them. Then there will be no more threat.
Instead, we have Governments who openly acknowledge the terrorist threat and then do the exact opposite of what is needed to end it. i.e. Fight fire with fire. The only rational conclusions are that they are either: A. conpletely incompetent - possible but not likely on such a large scale IMO; B. So brainwashed by religion, capitalist ideals and emotion from the event that they can't think clearly - highly likely; C. Lying to us - Probable IMO based on just how many times and on the scale that it happens.
Here's another way they could engage us in real discussions about world politics: Tell us "Ok, we are invading Iraq. This has nothing to do with 9/11. Nothing to do with terrorism. The fact is, right now we need the oil". If they said that yeah people would be pissed off, but at least we'd know the truth and be able to make informed decisions. But that is not what happens.
Your point about the conspiracy being a nice simple little viewpoint is complete BS by the way. The conspiracy theory is at least if not more complicated than the OS and still involves international relations between almost every country. Your comparison is not valid.