Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
Yes...because 1600 something architects and engineers, out over a million registered in the US alone, is just soooo convincing...especially as few of them have any real experience in building nice big skyscrapers like the WTC. Pilots for 9/11 truth? The no-planers? Just...lol.
Spout links all you like. I used to have A&E bookmarked, amongst others. Now I only keep links to WTC7.net, history commons, and 9/11 timeline. because, well, those sites actually bother providing links to reliable, trustworthy sources to base their cases. Intead of going to Crackhead Central...errr...I mean, webfairy.
You're unquestionably getting the upper hand in this debate, Skadi, so I'll address the question to you. You're obviously thinking for yourself instead of mindlessly gong along with the herd simply because "1600 people signing some petition are telling you how to think".
Would you agree with the statement that if the conspiracy people subscribing to these weird "no planes" ,"nukes in the basement", fake crash sites", etc conspiracy theories would only hold their own conspiracy claims up to the exact same stringent level of critical analysis that they do the 9/11 commission report, they wouldn't be conspiracy theorists for very long? IT strikes me as very odd that thesee truthers will argue over every nut, bolt, and door hinge...and I've even seen one guy arguing over how the nearby birds should have been flying...and yet they'll simply assume all these kilotons of super explosives got into the building without anyone noticing simply by some vague magic.
It's as intellectually dishonest as it gets.