It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The US is planning to sue more than a dozen major banks for misrepresenting the quality of mortgages they sold during the housing bubble, the New York Times reports.
Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Goldman Sachs are to face action, the newspaper quotes sources as saying.
The suits will argue the banks, which assembled the mortgages and marketed them as securities to investors, failed to perform the due diligence required under securities law and missed evidence that borrowers’ incomes were inflated or falsified. When many borrowers were unable to pay their mortgages, the securities backed by the mortgages quickly lost value. Fannie and Freddie lost more than $30 billion, in part as a result of the deals, losses that were borne mostly by taxpayers. In July, the agency filed suit against UBS, another major mortgage securitizer, seeking to recover at least $900 million, and the individuals with knowledge of the case said the new litigation would be similar in scope.
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
The US is sueing the banks?
Aren't the banks already bankrupt but still kept alive by printed and tax payers money?
Title should read "US sues American Taxpayers for bailing out banks".
failed to perform the due diligence required under securities law and missed evidence that borrowers’ incomes were inflated or falsified.
The attorneys general, as well as federal officials, are pressing the banks to pay at least $20 billion in that case, with much of the money earmarked to reduce mortgages of homeowners facing foreclosure.
In addition, by law Fannie and Freddie were required to back loans to low-to-moderate income and minority borrowers, and the private-label securities were counted toward those goals.
Freddie Mac holds more than $80 billion in mortgage securities backed by more shaky home loans like sub-prime mortgages, Option ARM and Alt-A loans. Freddie estimates its total gross losses stand at roughly $19 billion. Fannie Mae holds $38 billion of securities backed by Alt-A and sub-prime loans, with losses standing at nearly $14 billion
Originally posted by Lightrule
Source -- BBC
The US is planning to sue more than a dozen major banks for misrepresenting the quality of mortgages they sold during the housing bubble, the New York Times reports.
Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Goldman Sachs are to face action, the newspaper quotes sources as saying.
The following is from the NY Times Article mentioned by the BBC.
The suits will argue the banks, which assembled the mortgages and marketed them as securities to investors, failed to perform the due diligence required under securities law and missed evidence that borrowers’ incomes were inflated or falsified. When many borrowers were unable to pay their mortgages, the securities backed by the mortgages quickly lost value. Fannie and Freddie lost more than $30 billion, in part as a result of the deals, losses that were borne mostly by taxpayers. In July, the agency filed suit against UBS, another major mortgage securitizer, seeking to recover at least $900 million, and the individuals with knowledge of the case said the new litigation would be similar in scope.
-Lightruleedit on 2-9-2011 by Lightrule because: (no reason given)
US authorities are to sue 17 major banks for losses on mortgage-backed investments that cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars. The Federal Housing Finance Agency said it was taking action against banks including Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and HSBC. The agency says they misrepresented the quality of the mortgages they sold during the housing bubble. The values plunged as the US was engulfed in the financial crisis. The FHFA oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The two firms lost more than $30bn (£18.5bn), partly because of their investments in the subprime mortgages, and were bailed out by the US government. Since the rescues, US taxpayers have spent more than $140bn to keep the firms afloat. Other banks facing action include Royal Bank of Scotland, Nomura, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, and Societe Generale. A spokesman for RBS said: "We believe we have substantial and credible legal and factual defenses to these claims and will defend them vigorously."
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Lawsuits against banks over their mortgage lending and foreclosure practices continue to pile up, with JPMorgan, PNC Financial Services and Ally Financial disclosing suits on Tuesday.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. faces two possible class action lawsuits related to foreclosures, the No. 2 bank said in a regulatory filing.
The suits allege "common law fraud and misrepresentation, as well as violations of state consumer fraud statutes," JPMorgan said in the Securities and Exchange Commission filing, without disclosing who filed them.
Read more: Foreclosure suits against banks mount - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review www.pittsburghlive.com...
Posted 29 Oct 2010
According to an article by Charles Toutant at law.com, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) was cited in a New Jersey class action complaint on behalf of mortgagors who have pending foreclosure actions in that state. Toutant writes in the article:
Class Action Lawsuits Against Bank of America (BAC) – Who’s Next?