It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Creepy 10/28/11 Website Mystery

page: 595
104
<< 592  593  594    596  597  598 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:36 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


And where exactly did I say that the oct 28 site was rabout religion? So indeed, you were not looking in the right direction.
I have already apologized for that, if I was wrong. It looked like you said it about the oct28 page.


Did you just call me a troll for discussing things? You accuse me of arrogance? Really? You accuse me of that based on what?
No, I did not. I adressed you as snewpers:

And I adressed the trolls as the trolls:


Besides... who are you? I was here from the get go.
I am JoeSignal, an equal member of ATS, that has followed this thread from page one. I saw the thread when there was only the first post, what's your point? My first post is on pg 97, does that give you some kind of merit because you posted on pg 31 or whatever? I think not.


You dare to put that down about trolls. I think it fits you quite well to be honest. The arrogance of some people. tsk!
Yes I dare. So you think I am a troll, because I after almost 600 pages decide to ask the trolls why they waste their time here? Why they dwell here, if it is such a wrong place to be? You of course have a right to your opinion, I don't see myself as a troll.


You can apologize now.
Yeah, that's not gonna happen in this context. I apologized for thinking you meant oct28 site was religious, as I misunderstood that line. I have nothing else to apologize.

Good day.




posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:38 AM
link   
reply to post by TheSilentwalker
 


.
Thanks!


I wonder how (s)he picked out my comment but failed
to see what I reacted to. I reckon the very word 'religion'
triggers some defense mechanism in certain people.

Nothing lost.
.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:42 AM
link   
reply to post by JoeSignal
 


.
I didn't think you would apologize. I know your kind.
Your post was completely based on a flawed assumption
on your part, correct? You address me about it and add
a little 'general' text about trolls.

Yup, mature indeed.
.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:46 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


I don't get this rampant paranoia about trolls.
Very strange. But then again, this is a conspiracy theories website.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:50 AM
link   
reply to post by TheSilentwalker
 


.
Well you know what it is. It's about balance. *nods*
This whole thread is heading one way, no questions
asked. If you shed some light on it, any color will do,
some crawl back into hiding and if you do that more
than once you are a troll for not sucking up to the
general idea. I don't care, there's a reason why this
was moved to 'general chitchat'. That's what I do,
I general chitchat.
.
edit on 20-9-2011 by snewpers because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:09 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


Why the hostility? I presented no hostility towards you.

In no way do I see you as a troll. I hope that has been made clear now. My mistake was that I didn't make two separate posts, thereby insinuating you were one of those adressed. My other mistake was apparently that I adressed you at all.

Wasn't your reply towards me also flawed assumption? Seeing that the troll part of my post wasn't directed at you.

I will not apologize for that. I shouldn't have to. You can apologize all you want to. I will not be noticing.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:13 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


Sometimes there is and sometimes there is not!
And I see that I must apologize to you for misreading a post ( however I did not call you a troll, I was referring to others that have tried to derail this thread and so did Joe! ).
So, You have my sincerest apologies for misreading your post. But not for the troll part as it was not directed at you.
No hard feelings?

Namasté
edit on 20/9/2011 by KhaliWitch because: read some later posts and had to correct a few things



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   
.
Pfffft.



My mistake was that I didn't make two separate posts, thereby insinuating you were one of those adressed





Wasn't your reply towards me also flawed assumption? Seeing that the troll part of my post wasn't directed at you.


I didn't assume anything. I read your insinuation
and reacted. There's no assumption in that.
.



Originally posted by JoeSignal
reply to post by snewpers
 


Why the hostility? I presented no hostility towards you.
In no way do I see you as a troll. I hope that has been made clear now. My mistake was that I didn't make two separate posts, thereby insinuating you were one of those adressed. My other mistake was apparently that I adressed you at all.
Wasn't your reply towards me also flawed assumption? Seeing that the troll part of my post wasn't directed at you.

I will not apologize for that. I shouldn't have to. You can apologize all you want to. I will not be noticing.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by KhaliWitch
 


.
No hard feelings whatsoever. I wasn't directing
my posts to you

.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


Snewpers, there were 2 posts in 1, namely the reply to you and a general post towards those that have been attacking this thread. Neither of us hview you as a troll, so we will not apologize for something you have misread/ misunderstood. Simple. Now drop it.

Namasté



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:21 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 


But I am now directing replies at you due to the fact that you are overreacting.

Namasté



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:21 AM
link   
Probably some type of advertising...



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Thrax
 


Blessed be.


Namasté



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:23 AM
link   
reply to post by JoeSignal
 





posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:24 AM
link   
Ahh, so back to the same old circle of someone is a troll if they don't agree with the entire love, light, harmony, peace, 'just think good thoughts and all humanity will be saved' theme.
Interesting....



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:25 AM
link   
reply to post by KhaliWitch
 


I can feel it being different already from when I started.


I don't know if this is beneficial for others, or if I am the only rookie here, but it really helped me to stop trying. The moment I stopped trying and let it come to me, as described many places here in this thread, it started to present itself. I feel rejuvenated by this whole process, people also respond in mysterious ways, and I am beginning to see the patterns all around me.

KhaliWitch, you sound experienced, is it ok to just let go, and not think too much about breathing, positions etc.?



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Grower
 


Well, groupthink is a hard sticky cement, eh? Yet somehow, as easily scratched as the lake's waters…

Hello Grower



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheSilentwalker
reply to post by Grower
 


Well, groupthink is a hard sticky cement, eh? Yet somehow, as easily scratched as the lake's waters…

Hello Grower


Uh-huh.
Hello, Silent.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Grower
 


.
Sounds familar doesn't it?


But all is well, I just overreacted, I was wrong
and I should apologize for their fuggedup'd post.

And all this time the post could have been edited.
.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by snewpers
reply to post by Grower
 


.
Sounds familar doesn't it?


But all is well, I just overreacted, I was wrong
and I should apologize for their fuggedup'd post.

And all this time the post could have been edited.
.


'Round and 'round we go, eh?



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 592  593  594    596  597  598 >>

log in

join