posted on Aug, 19 2004 @ 02:00 PM
Government sponsored terrorism has been around for many years. Since the early days of the Romans when they burned down entire cities and blamed it on
the Christians in order to get what they want. Hitler even used this tactic when he had the Reichstag building burned to the ground and blamed it on
terrorists in order to pass antiterrorist legislation and gun control laws. This led to concentration camps and the execution of over 5 million Jews.
Even the United states had put government sponsored terrorism on paper with the creation of the Northwood document in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of
Staff. This document called for the hijacking of planes, the printing of fake casualties lists in American papers, and sniper shootings in Washington
and Miami all to create a reason to invade Cuba during the States conflict with them. The there was the first World Trade Centre bombing and the
Oklahoma city bombing witch the governments hands were all over. However if I were to explain those events I would not have enough space or time to
talk about September 11. It was the governments involvement that created this event and I will start by explaining how with the Pentagon.
Some of the clearest proof that 9/11 was an act of United States Sponsored Terrorism comes from a close examination of the Pentagon Attack. There's
insufficient Pentagon Attack Debris for it to be the scene of an airliner crash. There is no debris on the lawn after the Pentagon Attack that is
consistent with the crash of a 100 tonne airliner. The upright cable spools are independent proof in their own right that a Boeing 757 did not crash
into the Pentagon on 9/11. The Pentagon is four stories high, and if each story is 10-12ft in height, and the added height for the roof area is
another 10ft., the total height of the building would be approximately 58ft. The width of the hole according to this and other photos would be about
60-65ft. The wingspan of a 757 as stated earlier is almost 125ft. Why is there no visible damage on either side of the hole where the wings would have
struck? So if the Bush administration could have staged the attack on the Pentagon, is it possible that they could have been behind the events that
happened at the World Trade Centre?
Lets look at some unanswered questions about the world trade centre. The Twin Towers exploded outwards as far as 70 m. The tremendous force exploded
the walls and entire structure out horizontally. The buildings came down in about the same time as a free fall - there was no friction of a collapse.
The buildings were exploded into fine dust, not collapsed pieces. Where does the energy come from to turn all this reinforced concrete into dust?. The
demolition of the Twin Towers was not a conventional Controlled Demolition like the Building7Collapse. A more different process must have been used to
get the buildings to explode outwards, as far as 70 m. Lets look at the building 7 collapse, at 5:22p.m. on September 11th 2001, the 47 story building
number 7 of the W.T.C. Plaza came down in slightly over 8 seconds. The building had not been hit by any plane, nor sustained any damage from the
collapse of the Twin Towers 7 hours earlier, nor was there any major fire in the building at the time. So why did this building fall? Also jet fuel
can’t melt steel. No fire in history has lead to the collapse of a steel office building, even after hours of raging fires; when the Twin Towers
exploded, the fires had almost gone out. The temperatures measured of the core of the rubble, five days later, exceed the maximum temperature for a
kerosene fire. The maximum temperature for a kerosene fire is insufficient to melt steel; to use jet fuel to melt steel would be an amazing discovery
in the laws of physics.
Now on to the terrorists who had reportedly token part in the attacks mainly, the supposed ring leader Muhammed Atta. He was said to have reached
Boston by plane on September 11. Then given the time between that fight and flight 11 he seemed to have lost his baggage. But why would Mr.Atta have
baggage if his intentions was to commit suicide? The more ridiculous thing his that CNN had claimed that the F.B.I. had discovered Muhammed Attas
passport in the wreckage of the W.T.C., but how is this conceivable if the black boxes on the plane had melted as well as the plane itself
What's next? That's a good question, as I have no reason to believe that they will stop at the massacres of 9/11 and the invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq. If 9/11 was Bush's Reichstag Fire (1936/2001), then we are in the period that Churchill called “The Gathering Storm”. The Bush Plan for
America has us 3/4 of the way down the road to Fascism. All of the elements of a Police State have long been put into place, and 9/11 is proof that
the American people will quietly submit to the most outrageous acts and deception without even asking what really happened. The Patriot Act has
already been passed into law and section 802 states you are a domestic terrorist if you violate Federal or state law while endangering someone. George
Bush's favourite lapdog is introducing similar legislation before the British Parliament that gives police the right to detain anyone in the vicinity
of a suspected bioterrorist attack, and to extend existing powers to detain foreign terror suspects without trial to all British subjects. The
Canadian version, 37/2 C-17 was passed by the House of Commons 7 October 2003. This is a problem facing everyone and if we don’t stand up soon and
stop it as a group, then the police state will control us as a group.
We elevate the Threat Level in the War on Freedom to Code Red.