It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TWILITE22
he said "the one thing about Rick Perry is he wants to win at any cost"now to me that sounds a little strange coming from this person that is supposed to be a "christian",and that last word is actually what scares me the most...What will he do to win?How far will he go?
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Those were some pretty spot on observations by the BBC that should give you an incite into what the Media sees instead of operating with your blinders on and dismissing it offhand.
Ron Paul was labeled a 9/11 truther yet he did nothing to tell them idiots in his campaign to back off or go on a national platform disassociating himself from them completely.
When these same rabid anarchists show up at his current rallies and disrupt others with their hacker Anonymous posters and masks, what is he going to do then?
Originally posted by adeclerk
How about a straw poll for the other party?
Excuse my ignorance, but how exactly does raising more money determine which candidate has the best position on issues? Is that indicative of how beneficial his actions as president will be for this country?
You ripped my post apart and commented on each point that you did that to....but....you left out the portion that ties it all together. The 4 million dollars he raised. Convenient yet transparent.
When he raised that 4 million, his supporters were and still are pumped up about it and pointing to it, which makes it suspect why you left it out in your chop shop attempt to rebutt my points.
You see, the 4 million is 3 1/2 times less than Romney and probably 30 times less than Obama's war chest. Yes it is third best but third best is not even close to second best in this case. The MSM looks at this and does not see a contender, possibly a spoiler down the road to make a story out of, but not a shot to win it.
Um....no, we shouldn't. The media is ignoring Ron Paul, that's not something to be happy about.
He is lucky the MSM didn't paint him as the sure fire shoe in winner before the Iowa strawpoll with Romney not there, lol, because that is what should have happened according to the moneys raised so far. The MSM accurately covered the winning underdog Bachman according to the money map. They took it easy on Ron Paul by not painting him as a big loser. You guys should be happy.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by Freenrgy2
I believe only Republicans can vote in the primary elections. So, anybody who's not a Republican should register as one to get him up against Obama and the media could no longer ignore him. Otherwise, he'd have to switch to Independent and get the Nader treatment in the media. If Jesse Ventura is serious though, and runs with him for VP if RP doesn't get the Republican nomination and switches to Independent, which I hear he will do...that may be interesting.