It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you're not going to look at the evidence that disproves your belief, we're done discussing this topic because you've been proved wrong but maintain your false belief.
I am not reviewing the video I am telling you that there has to be some type of evidence left. If not, everyone would use it and there would be no evidence for any crime. Your statement as well as Mr Sullivans makes no sense.
What is your point? First your stance was there would be evidence of wires, now you go to saying a detonation method that wouldn't require wires (which you were previously unaware of) wouldn't be used because somebody sending a text message or changing the channel might detonate it?
Originally posted by sir_slide
What the OP has learned throughout the thread:
Too sum up my thoughts on this thread/debate I will have to say that I am very disappointed with the hostile responses from many defenders of the OS. If you cannot debate the topic without snarling at people and trying your best to completely undermine them then you shouldn't be debating it. You should write a book on how the OS is 100 per cent correct and leave the investigation up to people who aren't so quick to come to conclusions and to openly attack other people for their questions and queries.
Originally posted by esdad71
reply to post by dilly1
Construction or Controlled Demolitions? Get it right dilly..It does not take a degree in mechanical engineering nor structural engineering to see that the towers collapsed without explosives. Why is this so hard. You are also correct in stating Two 116 ton jets carrying 23k gallons each cannot pulverize 1,200,000tons(included WTC7 which it did not hit so not sure why this is included) of mild steel and concrete. I am not sure who says this happened. Events led to the eventual collapse which included two planes striking the buildings, igniting fires that weakened the structure and then collapsed.
As far as blasting caps, I watched the video. I am not reviewing the video I am telling you that there has to be some type of evidence left. I do not think I said blasting caps either. You see, If not, everyone would use it and there would be no evidence for any crime. Your statement as well as Mr Sullivans makes no sense. Car bombs would be a dime a dozen if it cannot be traced with your secret technology.
Let's see where we stand. It is a fact that the technology to wirelessly detonate explosives exists, but it is speculation that radio sources nearby could disrupt the communication.
Forgetting that roof was festooned with all manner of antenna for cell phones, paging, wireless communication
and the big kahuna - the massive radio/TV antenna on North tower used by most of the radio and TV
stations in NYC.
Go to the site today- find signs all over the place warning to shut off radio because of blasting
There's no guarantee that these radio sources would detonate the explosives, there is only a small chance at best.
Geez - had to do job at Pharmacuetical plant, had to shut off cell phones inside production areas because
of explosion threat, yet say wireless detonaters at WTC.
This is why:
So why no traces, no wires, blasting caps, delay tubes, blasting mats, copper smears on columns from cutting
I assume when Tom Sullivan says "nothing", that he means "nothing". Because if there were traces of evidence left after detonation, there wouldn't be "nothing" left, there would be "something" left, and he probably would have made that clear, don't you agree?
Well you wouldn't have found steel casings to be left in the rubble, they haven't been used for years. What we use now is RDX copper jacketed shape charges, and when they're initiated there is nothing left of those charges
That's not very nice.
Nada, Zip, Zilch, Zero - only in delusions of conspiracy loons........
You clearly must not have any common sense, or maybe you do and your being paid to deflect and derail the opposing argument. I don't know..... But there is only one way to dismantle all that WTC steel within one day,,, and its not gravity or mass(cause I already debunked those too factors in the paragraph above). It can only be done by controlled demolition. I don't know and I don't care if it was explosives or thermate or both. What I do know for a fact is it was done by men who are experts in construction and demolition. The mushroom affect we all saw that day was not the slabs being pulverized by the mass above pushing down floor by floor. The mushroom affect was concrete being blown up by something artificially made by man. What you don't care to learn is there is no set in stone way in demolishing a structure. Its actually an art. Blowing # up is actually fun. And one can make the structure fall in any way or angle, its truly amazing.
Key phrase: "has the potential". OK, there might be a slim chance that this could happen, but it didn't happen!
You cannot control the individual actions of the normal employees at WTC.
One may decide to bring in a high power transmitter. Such as a HAM operator. With that altitude you can get some really good DX contacts.
There could easily be an electrical failure anywhere in the building, causing an arc. This would create a high power broadband RF signal.
Either of these has the potential to set off one or more charges. Not to mention the active TV antenna next door. How would TPTB explain a one or two going off weeks before the main show?
I'm always warned by the stewardresses to turn off my cellphone, and they aren't kidding either, but the airplane never plummets to the ground when I keep it on.
Many of us have driven down the road and seen the blasting signs warning us to turn of two way radios. They are not kidding. And they don’t even use radio det.
Dude in a goverment false-flag attack, I doubt they're just going to whip out the white pages and call up a demolition crew to wire the World Trade Centers. The complexity of this thing would be much more than a demo. team walking in the front door and setting up explosives in plain sight of all of the workers.
Could you even find a nut to install charge after charge knowing that the odds of an erroneous detonation goes up as time goes on?
Originally posted by esdad71
Tell me what happens to the 'mass' that is created when the upper floors absorb the lower floors as they are collapsing. You have to recalculate at each impact with each floor because the mass changes.There is also the velocity change between floors with the greater mass. Mass not only from the building materials but the commercial contents.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs - equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs.
1. While driving down the road, a firefly strikes the windshield of a bus and makes a quite obvious mess in front of the face of the driver. This is a clear case of Newton's third law of motion. The firefly hit the bus and the bus hits the firefly. Which of the two forces is greater: the force on the firefly or the force on the bus?
Originally posted by rswalla
Building 7 - I have been to NYC numerous times and I am always amazed that ANY of the buildings in NYC are standing - the footers compared to the height of the buildings - it's mind boggling. I've dealt with construction and know how important footers are to a building.