It still quite amazes me that the only 3 buildings to EVER collapse in this manner happened on that day.
Building 7 fell from a fire and some debris damage? Sure it did. Either the construction of the World Trade Center was the absolute WORST construction
of sky scrapers ever in history, or there is something more to it. There of course have been many building fires, and skyscrapers with immense damage
that never fell. Granted they didn't take an airplane hit. But there have been some cases of horrendous fires that lasted two days spanning the
entire building. And yet those buildings still stood. But we are supposed to believe not one, but TWO 100+ floor skyscrapers blew OUT and fell down,
taking every floor below it with it, because of some kerosene and structural damage? Who really is insane???
I get a kick out of people arguing "facts" by trying to use the NIST findings. That NIST report is a joke. NIST was ran by people notorious for
whitewashes. Just look at who was head of the NIST report and you'll see what I mean. When a criminal murders someone, do we ask him to act as judge
at his own trial? No. So why do we do it here?
So, after 10 years I am still left with the same questions.
1) How did not one, but two 100+ story Skyscrapers fall, in a manner of 10 seconds by supposed fire and structural damage? Why didn't the tops just
sheer off instead of hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete, metal, office materials, steel, etc turning into talcum powder?????
2) Why did building 7 fall straight down from a fire and small damage? There were MANY other buildings around 1 & 2 that took MASSIVE amounts of
damage and they didn't neatly collapse. Yet #7 dropped the penthouse and came tumbling down. Perhaps they forgot Flight 93 never made it there?
3) Why was #7 reported down way before it actually fell?
These are simple questions. These questions could have been answered if evidence wasn't so quickly destroyed. Why was that? That steel could have sat
for a while out in Jersey. But we sold it off almost immediately. Why?
I know that those who believe the "official story" are going to go after me saying that WTC 7 has been debunked already and I'm stupid. I've
looked at its 'debunking' and their stories are laughable at best. I know there are those who will go after me and say that I'm not an engineer and
I'm crazy and I know nothing. Your right. I'm not an engineer. But hundreds of REAL engineers have said the same.
(
AE911Truth.org). I've also been studying 9/11 since the day it happened. As I live in NY and I was very close
to the situation it never sat right with me.
Before I get slammed for my viewpoints I might as well tell you what I currently believe happened, so there is no misconception.
1) Yes, I believe two aircraft hit the Towers. I believe the stories about holograms, or aliens, or mini-nukes are a terribly poor attempt at
dis-info, placed to lump us together and look crazy.
2) I believe there were charges set in the buildings the week (or two) prior to 9/11. Possibly put in place during the security shut down in the
buildings, under the guise of "upgrading the Internet" or whatever it was they were doing.
3) I believe "terrorists" actually did take control of those aircraft. They were helped along by our government, or a select few within our
government. It was definitely made easier for them to be here, to do what they were doing, and to board the planes, even though they ALL set off the
metal detectors.
4) No, I don't believe the terrorist pilots were in control of the aircraft after a certain point. I very much believe the planes were controlled
remotely. Call me crazy but I've seen a lot of theoretical evidence that helps overcome the fact of lack of piloting skills.
5) I 100% believe Mosad was involved. It was a means to get us into wars. Wars for profit on our side, and the destruction of Israeli enemies for
them.
Of course I could go into further detail but its not the point of this topic. The point is I don't believe the official story. If you do? Fine. Good.
But your not going to convince anyone else to believe it by saying the "Truth Movement" is just a bunch of crazy loons who should just shut up and
hug a flag. I actually quite enjoy having debates with calm, rational people who DO believe the official story. I often learn things from them, and
perhaps they learn something new from me. What I can't stand is the accusations and name calling by those who believe the OS. It gets to the point
where if you don't agree with them, your just stupid and ignorant. Yes, that happens from our side too. But it seems much more prevalent from the OS
side.
The building free-falls, so what happens to the stuff that should be crashing
into each other and causing the building to collapse? It is also falling with the building at the same rate, a feat that could be acheived with
explosives but not random fires causing a single core column failure. 
