It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by dilly1
Eight months of around the clock efforts with over one thousand people? Try educating yourself about what they actually had to do to move some of that wreckage. Then get back to me.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by wmd_2008
Dear readers.
Do you see a pattern here?
All of the OS faithful spend most of their time ridiculing. Go back over this thread...look at the constant mocking.
Think for a moment how the truth would be treated if someone did stumble upon it.
Would they be ignored? Ridiculed?
I'm not saying my hypotheses are correct, but I am saying that if they were correct, this is the sort of treatment I"d expect to receive. I guess I might be on the right track.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by waypastvne
Or Robert Clark's shot is a still from Tina Cart's video whch seems more likely than to have three iconic photographers all sharing the same flat.
you are right my friend
Originally posted by jhn7537
Originally posted by kaya82
you being serious? Madness
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by kaya82
Page 10, 3rd post from the bottom, this thread.
Kaya, he aint worth it, he is the epitome of a debunker, but he attempts to debunk claims with nothing....... I cant wait for him to explain away the thermite/thermate residue Steven Jones found from the rubble he tested....
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by waypastvne
Or Robert Clark's shot is a still from Tina Cart's video whch seems more likely than to have three iconic photographers all sharing the same flat.
All of them lived in the same building and had access to the roof.
Which video is fraudulent ?
Or Robert Clark's shot is a still from Tina Cart's video whch seems more likely than to have three iconic photographers all sharing the same flat.
Here I find Luc Courchesne's videos were published on the Naudet Film:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Why would the Naudet's include video of an amateur photographer's work before it was publicly available?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by waypastvne
Or Robert Clark's shot is a still from Tina Cart's video whch seems more likely than to have three iconic photographers all sharing the same flat.
All of them lived in the same building and had access to the roof.
Originally posted by Yankee451
"we all lived in the same building and all shared the same roof...that's our story and we're sticking to it"
Originally posted by Yankee451
That's just the beginning, and I invite the readers to do their own homework and make up their own minds.
Care to comment on Luc Courchesne?
Originally posted by Yankee451
I'm using the Filmmakers' Commemorative Edition, released in 2002.
I went over the Luc Courchesne WMV, and although it's really small and hard to see, it appears the footage in the Naudet DVD was pulled from early in the Courchesne footage.
The Naudet's footage was released in 2002, but the Courchesne footage doesn't appear to have been released until 2004, although that's not cast in stone. That's when the CBC aired it. However, note the quality of the footage in the Naudet film as compared to the WMV file. If the CBC version had the full footage, I could get a better screen shot of it to compare.
Compare the little whisp highlighted below:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5b2566aa6c27.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e95727ff4c99.jpg[/atsimg]
By the way, like many of the amateur photographers, Luc is another 3D animator. His work can be found here:
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by waypastvne
It is the same footage which has gone through formatting changes.
The significance of this is that the Naudet film was released two years before the Courchesne footage, which, combined with Leslie Raphael's revelations are damning indeed.
Congratulations ! You are reading the one 9/11 website with a hope in hell of getting us somewhere : one with some actual hard documentary (literally) evidence behind it —and one that names names. You won't find the Illuminati in this one ; you won't find the claim that no planes ever hit the Trade Center, because I don't believe that ; you won't find your time wasted with "proofs" of demolitions carried out by folk who are never identified, even by speculation.
Step 1 : anyone interested in 9/11, no matter what your views on who did it, should already have a DVD copy of the film "9/11," directed by Jules and Gédéon Naudet and James Hanlon. If you think you're an expert on 9/11, but you don't have that film, you're not.