reply to post by origamiandurbanism
...True revolution is the only way and if that occurs it'll probably be another 50 or 100 years before another one will be needed.....
Another word on the idea of a "Revolution" (and Money)
The other problem with a "True revolution" is the Bankers have already infiltrated ALL the So called "Grass Roots" organizations. That is what
Maurice Strong's brilliant move of creating NGOs (especially UN sanctioned NGOs) was all about.
By bankrolling various groups and installing well trained puppets at the head, the bankers grabbed control of "Grass Roots" groups as US Farmers
fighting the Ag Cartel found to their sorrow. (That is where my odyssey in fact finding started.)
We expected Organic Consumers Union and Food & Water Watch to back us up - NOPE. They turned on us and called us
"HYSTERICAL" denying the Ag Cartel connection. Seems Marlene Barlow director
of both was handsomely rewarded for this betrayal with a Senior Advisor slot at the UN!. Also you can trace the Money connections to the Rockefeller
and Tides Foundations.
The Tea Party is another example of Bankster maneuvering. It started as the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and was
denigrated in the media to turn off any liberal and moderate conservatives.
Then Sara Palin was quickly installed as the "Head" to nullify Ron Paul and split the movement. (No I am not a member, the media hype worked on me
too

)
Remember 97% of the USA money supply is now in the form of bank loans so the bankers are creaming a minimum of 5% off the GNP of this country. What
are they doing with that vast river of money???
I think this sums up the actual situation quite nicely:
...We're talking about a river of unearned wealth that is so wide you can't even think of crossing it, flowing perpetually into the banking
cartel. A dead short across the productive element of society. Money being taken from people who are working hard providing the material and the
labor. They don't even know that this is being taken from them and it's in this huge river of wealth flowing into the banking cartel. It's a
staggering thought.
You are led to the question of where is this river flowing? Where's it going? ....
They're not accumulating it at all. What are they spending it for? The answer may surprise you. They're not buying more yachts and mansions with
this money, they've already got all of those they possibly want....
When a person has all the wealth that you could possibly want for the material pleasures of life, what is left? Power. They are using this
river of wealth to acquire power over you and me and our children.
They are spending it to acquire control over the power centers of society. The power centers are those groups and institutions through which
individuals live and act and rely on for their information. They are literally buying up the world but not the real estate and the hardware, they're
buying control over the organizations, the groups and institutions that control people.
In other words, to be specific, they are buying control over politicians, political parties, television networks, cable networks, newspapers,
magazines, publishing houses, wire services, motion picture studios, universities, labor unions, church organizations, trade associations, tax-exempt
foundations, multi-national corporations, boy scouts, girl scouts, you name it.
Make your own list of organizations and you will find that this is where those people have been for many decades spending this river of wealth to
acquire operational control particularly over those institutions and individuals, those organizations that represent opposition to themselves. That's
a critical area for expenditure on their part..... www.bigeye.com...
The goal of course is GLOBAL GOVERNANCE:
"The impulse to possess turf is a powerful one for all species; yet it is one that people must overcome." ...
"global rules of custom constrain the freedom of sovereign states," ...
"sensitivity over the relationship between international responsibility and national sovereignty [is a] considerable obstacle to the leadership at
the international level,"....
"Although states are sovereign, they are not free individually to do whatever they want." - Maurice Strong, a member of the Commission, and a
likely candidate for the position of Secretary General, said in an essay entitled Stockholm to Rio: A Journey Down a Generation: "It is
simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. It is a principle which will yield
only slowly and reluctantly to the imperatives of global environmental cooperation." sovereignty.net...
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE and the World Trade Organization - by the directer of WTO:
Article - Of What
Use is Global Governance? | The Global Journal
Global Governance 2025 | Atlantic Council
This report analyzes the gap between current international governance institutions, organizations and norms and the demands for global governance
likely to be posed by long-term strategic challenges over the next 15 years. The report is the product of research and analysis by the NIC and EUISS
following a series of international dialogues co-organized by the Atlantic Council, TPN, and other partner organizations in Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, New
Delhi, Pretoria, Sao Paulo & Brasilia, Moscow, and Paris. The executive summary is below.
Executive Summary
Global governance—the collective management of common problems at the international level—is at a critical juncture.....
Globa
l Governance 2025 Planned by US & EU Intelligence Agencies Document Obtained Thru FOIA. You may read this September 2010 report, courtesy
of our Freedom of Information Act,
at
cia.gov.