It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by mb2591
Just as many anons are only fighting against net censorship so they can continue to pirate games and movies or pass around child porn (CP). c wat i did thar?
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Originally posted by depth om
anon are a cover for agents to do digital false flags to sanction/license internet usage
You must have missed the bit where they blatantly attacked anyone who suggested we censor the internet. You know... the whole point.
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by mb2591
Made stuff up, eh? Just like you completely fabricated why I would be annoyed that what anonymous does affects me. Reply if you want, but you won't receive one back from me. Your hypocrisy and walking into that has rendered anything you further say of zero value to me. Nice job
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by mb2591
Yes there is and they existed long before imageboards and iirc channels. They just had a different label back then. I'm against the script kiddies and DDoS attackers. They try to play in a world they don't understand and sometimes get pent up doing so. That's a fact. It is too broad of a group. Which means since they are everything and nothing they can be influenced to do anything or nothing and it is playing right into TPTB hands. Somewhere around 18 months ago anons attacks got too political for me. It became about agendas and not just fighting for the people. They've given lawmakers the case for the net censorship they claim to fight against and that affects me. Which is B.S.. Citizens like myself shouldn't have to suffer because some have been duped into playing out a political agendas
Plus, the subculture is too infiltrated to side with because one in four is playing for the other team and the group is not technically proficient enough as a whole. In the past I would side based on the issue, but I've always just lurked because I don't do armchair activism.
edit on 3-7-2011 by AlexKintner because: changed word, added another
Sounds to me like your more worried about being able to look at certain websites than being actually free.
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by mb2591
Classy guy. Spinning like Bill O'Reilly now. Or maybe it is a reading comprehension thing because you must have forgot you said this:
Sounds to me like your more worried about being able to look at certain websites than being actually free.
Which was what I was referring to. But victory is yours, dude. You got a reply. A winrar is you
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by mb2591
You are twisting what I wrote and taking it out of context. In your mind you think you trapped me in a corner. IN YOUR MIND
If I understand you correctly you are saying that you shouldn't have to suffer from web censorship
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by depth om
Star for you. I completely agree the moniker 'anon' is now being used to get net censorship implemented. I will say IMO there was a time where they were what it seems like many still feel they are. That time is around a couple years removed, though. If you were watching it was almost blatantly obvious that anon had been infiltrated because there was a dramatic shift in the focus of raids and an increase in raids and PR for the raids.
'Anon' is the perfect cover for the exact reasons you said.