It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by SG-17
Who said anything about who payed for the signs?
Answer the question:
Which is more pervasive?
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by SG-17
Who said anything about who payed for the signs?
Answer the question:
Which is more pervasive?
Originally posted by randyvs
Whah !
Yep There go the atheists. Fighting for truth, justice and the american way.
Some may not see it as an issue since they may agree with it. But put up a street sign that says "Allah Is The Only True God Lane" and I assure you people will object and rightfully so.
Originally posted by JayTaylor
reply to post by SaturnFX
If I was in the Middle East, sure. Whatever they wanna do there is their business and I'd look the other way.
This is the USA however and I think people who have issues with the mainstream religions here need to keep it to themselves or get over it. Even if I was an atheist I'd have more sense than to throw a fit every time somebody built something that might refer to God.
Originally posted by JayTaylor
This is the USA however and I think people who have issues with the mainstream religions here need to keep it to themselves or get over it.
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
Originally posted by Annee
I think the city should now offer Atheists a street sign. For equality.
I like that: "Ain't No God Avenue"
You KNOW the religious would be outraged and making all kinds of noise.edit on 22-6-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)
I'd be more outraged at your piss poor grammar than I would be about your right to put up a sign.
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
There is a BIG difference b/t "Seven in Heaven Way" and "Allah is The Only True God Lane" (which does not honor anybody or anything BTW) Seven in Heaven Way is just a name. Oh Thank Heaven For 7-11? Where were you guys on that one?
The atheist group had their chance to voice their opinions when the resolution went through the community board. Too little too late guys. It's a done deal. You had the opportunity and you blew it. You now have ZERO reason to complain. END OF STORY
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by Ancient Champion
Atheists need to find ways to justify their existence and feel relevant. They do this by complaining about a street sign, complaining about nativity scenes, complaining about the ten commandments at a court house, and complaining about "under God" in the pledge of allegiance.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by SG-17
Who said anything about who payed for the signs?
Answer the question:
Which is more pervasive?
How is that question relevant? The relevant question is:
Which violates more of our fellow citizens' civil rights?
1. Publicly funded (and approved)street signs with exclusive religious sentiments
2. Publicly funded street signs with no religious sentiments expressed
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by Ancient Champion
Don't get me wrong, because it is certainly their right to voice their opinion in a peaceful manner (although peaceful atheist is somewhat of an oxymoron).
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by SG-17
Who said anything about who payed for the signs?
Answer the question:
Which is more pervasive?
City leaders seemed dumbfounded by the atheists’ outrage because no one complained about the sign as it was going through a public approval process. “It’s unfortunate that they didn’t raise this as an issue while it was undergoing its public review either at the community board level or when it came before the City Council on their public agenda,” said Craig Hammerman, the district manager for Brooklyn Community Board 6.
Hammerman told Fox News Radio that the community was “solidly behind this proposal. Not a single person stood up to speak out against it. I think it’s a little late in the process for someone to be bringing this up now.”
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
Since you avoid answering my question, I'll avoid answering yours and reply with another question.
Which violates more of our fallen heroes families?
1. Atheists crying about a single word on a single sign honoring 7 fallen victims of 9-11?
2.Atheists not giving a rats behind about them and only thinking of themselves and how a sign makes them feel?
Originally posted by SG-17
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by SG-17
Who said anything about who payed for the signs?
Answer the question:
Which is more pervasive?
The religious one, as it serves to perpetuate lies and ignorance.