"Controlled Demolition at WTC 100% Impossible" Article by Jonathan Moseley

page: 1
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 11:43 PM
link   
Regardless of your opinion on everything that happened that day, let's focus on only one issue, the possibility of controlled demolition...I thought this was an eye opening article. And lets not try and debunk the view that planes + fires brought the towers down JUST for this thread, and lets focus only of the likelihood of a CD so we have a basis of discussion to keep it civil (unlike the other threads lol) thank you.






Part 2:






Update: I made the text bigger
edit on 19-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 11:54 PM
link   
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
 


I stopped reading at the part where it was stated that there would be the need for explosives on the 47 support columns. There is absolutely no need for that many explosives if you are dealing with thermite. In fact, with the supposed strength of the thermite they were possibly using you wouldnt need more than a drum or two of it....
edit on 19-6-2011 by itisortofthetruth because: spelling error



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 11:58 PM
link   
Not a good thread. I wonder who wrote all that? can you provide who it was? He probably dosen't know all the facts.



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 11:58 PM
link   
The thermite was present in the building when it shouldn't have been. That should be more than enough evidence right there. Why was it there? Did someone just decide "Hm, im gunna bring a few drums of thermite to work today, no reason"



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
A high pressure, low-velocity thermobaric detonation is absolutely not comparable to Hollywood style fuel explosions.

WTF is this author talking about?



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
reply to post by AzureSky
 


can this thread now be a nano thermite appreciation thread because apparently the person who wrote that article overlooked that fact?
edit on 20-6-2011 by itisortofthetruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:01 AM
link   
reply to post by joeym1991
 

Jonathan Mossley what schmuck get you facts straight



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by itisortofthetruth
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
 


I stopped reading at the part where it was stated that there would be the need for explosives on the 47 support columns. There is absolutely no need for that many explosives if you are dealing with thermite. In fact, with the supposed strength of the thermite they were possibly using you wouldnt need more than a drum or two of it....
edit on 19-6-2011 by itisortofthetruth because: spelling error



Just like he said, people pick out one tiny detail they don't like in order to feel safe about discrediting the whole thing so they don't have to face the facts.. How do you explain all the detonator cords that SHOULD have been discovered but WEREN'T? How do you explain the building standing up after the application of the explosives when the supports had to be weakened for it to work? You only pick out one little detail you don't like while ignoring the other abundance of proof, try explaining ALL the claims.
edit on 20-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:06 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
 



A timed Controlled Demolition is always possible not everything is Impossible, dont forget the gold the from the towers were stolen from the towers from this day mainstream news doesn't want to talk about on what happened with the gold.


Personally Jonathan Moseley is covering up for the lies, when you watch the videos of the towers, it clearly shows like its been controlled demolished, steel buildings when hit by fires dont go crashing down in seconds they take hours.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:06 AM
link   
I don't understand why the article states, if it was rigged with explosives, it would have came down on the impact of the airplanes. There were explosions in the basement before the plane hit.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:12 AM
link   
People say the writer needs to get his facts straight when people are talking about thermite? REALLY? The "evidence" of thermite or thermate presented by Prof. Jones (and the supporters of his claims) was proven to be a shill and the whole scientific community (that aren't truthers) laugh at him lol The "thermate" or "thermite" was just primer paint, truthers tried debunking it, then that got debunked lol Here's an example:

oystein-debate.blogspot.com...

Talk of thermite or thermite is useless when there are no hard facts to support such claims. Let's get real.
edit on 20-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:15 AM
link   
Breaking news! Scientist says its IMPOSSIBLE for both the towers AND a building blocks away to demolish themselves at freefall speed. Also IMPOSSIBLE that for the VERY FIRST time in history 4 airplanes crashed including one into an empty feild and EVERY bit of wreckage was dissenigrated! Get over it truth boy they got caught and they all will hang for their crimes against their own people. Never a doubt! Now get off this site and go read some MSM bs.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:17 AM
link   

There were explosions in the basement before the plane hit.



And what would be the point of detonating explosives and causing explosions and HOUR before the towers collapsed, when a demolition only takes a few seconds? Please try to make sense here. There should have been SO many detonation cords or else how can there be a "controlled" demolition? How would be be controlled? ask yourself these questions.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:19 AM
link   

every bit of wreckage was dissenigrated!



Um no, 95% of flight 93 was recovered and there are COUNTLESS pictures of pictures of Flight 77 wreckage showing to be from an American Airline.. that "every bit of wreckage was disintegrated" claim was a lie! All truthers do is make stuff up, its so hilarious.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


Yes you got it! Nobody seems to remember the missin 200 BILLION in gold. Then guliani says hes happy to report that they had recovered 95 million of it! What a joke. Notice how the ONLY argument these people can come up with is the 'controlled demo' thing. What about all of the other PROVEN stuff that you people ignore? Get off our site!



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
Everyone knows that when the controlled demolition is being set up they cut the core columns to weaken to structure for when the bombs actually go off, so if a controlled demolition was set up BEFORE the impact of the jet. Then the building would have came down from the Jet due to the plane hitting an already SEVERELY damaged and weakened structure . Controlled Demolition not possible.
edit on 20-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
 


Really? EVERY SINGLE NEWS REPORT I have seen on 93 seems to show NO wreckage and belwildered reporters wondering where the wreckage is? Wake up, actually no dont, we dont want you on our side when we survive this tyranny of a government.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by AllUrChips
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
 


Really? EVERY SINGLE NEWS REPORT I have seen on 93 seems to show NO wreckage and belwildered reporters wondering where the wreckage is? Wake up, actually no dont, we dont want you on our side when we survive this tyranny of a government.



[SNIP] Just type in "flight 93 wreckage" in google images and you can see an abundance of Flight 93 wreckage proving your lies and dishonesty. Here is one:





Red, White, Blue....AMERICAN AIRLINES!!


You just proved yourself a liar by saying there was no wreckage, type it in yourself and you'll see plenty of plane wreckage. Quit spreading disinformation.
edit on 20-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)


Mod Note: General ATS Discussion Etiquette – Please Review This Link.
edit on 20-6-2011 by Gemwolf because: Removed insult.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:34 AM
link   
Oh well looks like you got me! How can anyone in their right mind argue with that pic juxtaposed to all the evidence of the government doing it to us up to and including YOUR ex leader dubya claiming he saw the first plane hit when no one saw that except the french documentry team there recording who later released the footage a day later. How did gwb see the first plane hit? beat it nerd



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by joeym1991
Not a good thread. I wonder who wrote all that? can you provide who it was? He probably dosen't know all the facts.



And that's based on what? Explain how a controlled demolition is possible when the only way to control is demo is by using detonator cords (how else would you?). There would have been SOOO much evidence of detonation cords if there was anything remotely CLOSE to a CD that happened, and they would have stretched out for BLOCKS. controlled demo not possible.





new topics

top topics



 
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join