It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"This bill goes far beyond prohibiting federal funding [for abortion]," said Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY). "The real purpose and effect of this bill is to eliminate private health care choices for women by imposing significant tax penalties on families and small businesses when they use their own money to pay for health insurance or medical care.
"This bill is so extreme that it manipulates the tax code to advance anti-choice policies and could spur the IRS to audit rape and incest survivors who choose abortion care," said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by Chewingonmushrooms
This isnt about who needs to pay. Or why, where or when. This is about personal responsibility. Something the left has forgot about for a long time now. 49% of america doesnt even pay taxes. 22% of people are on food stamps. The top 10% of top earners in this country already pay 80% of all federal taxes. It's time for the low lifes of america to get off their &** and contribute. Otherwise, this nation is heading for a fallout of great magnitude.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by civilchallenger
Well I see it this way, most states in this nation are Welfare states meaning that most of the services goes to those that can not pay or support themselves so what is the big deal tax dollars in most states goes to support welfare mothers and their children.
I don't seen many complaining about this here.
What cost more an abortion or welfare.
edit on 5-5-2011 by marg6043 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Chewingonmushrooms
Another thing that most aren't talking about in the subject is exponential growth in population and it's effect on resources, the environment, the economy and infrastructure. Eliminating abortion would be a step in the opposite direction for us as a species. People need to take more responsibility and use protection, and families need to stablize with no more than two children per.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by civilchallenger
Well I see it this way, most states in this nation are Welfare states meaning that most of the services goes to those that can not pay or support themselves so what is the big deal tax dollars in most states goes to support welfare mothers and their children.
I don't seen many complaining about this here.
Actually my husband and I pay more on taxes that two poor workers combine together, still I don't complain and I am sure don't care if the poor gets my tax payer dollars to pay for their abortions.
After all I am a tax payer and so my husband.
What cost more an abortion or welfare.
Originally posted by NadaCambia
Originally posted by Chewingonmushrooms
Another thing that most aren't talking about in the subject is exponential growth in population and it's effect on resources, the environment, the economy and infrastructure. Eliminating abortion would be a step in the opposite direction for us as a species. People need to take more responsibility and use protection, and families need to stablize with no more than two children per.
But again this doesn't address the causes. It would be like taking alcohol away from someone, sure it's going to make them miserable, but that's because they are miserable. That's good, then the problem can be recognized and worked on. Abortion prevents us from getting at the real issues, it promotes irresponsibility. The promotion of abortion is just wallpapering over a giant hole in the wall.
Eliminating abortion would only be a step in the opposite direction if we see abortion as the only solution to the problems we face. Fortunately there are many, many solutions. Unfortunately these solutions involve a massive rethink of society and the current Government, Bankers and Corporate types aren't allowing for it.