It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ufoinquirer
leonid elenin does have a daughter and i have a picture of him with her - that i can't share, too private - so he's eithe ra real guy, a real guy who didn't discover the comet but was given credit, or a real guy with a fake name
Originally posted by Helious
You don't find the data in your own post kinda strange...... At all? You know the Japan earthquake was predicted very accurately using NASA trajectory information right? There is going to be a 3-5 day window but your own data speaks to the fact that the object is related to all three.
Originally posted by Helious
Originally posted by ufoinquirer
leonid elenin does have a daughter and i have a picture of him with her - that i can't share, too private - so he's eithe ra real guy, a real guy who didn't discover the comet but was given credit, or a real guy with a fake name
He has a Russian name that has been "translated" to English for the sake of naming the comet, who translated it for him or why is subjective as there is no information as far as I can tell about that.
I believe he is a real man, I don't however believe he discovered and the comet and I don't believe his name could be that huge of a coincidence...
There is no "tension," or "release" or anything like that. It's not like an "alignment" increases the total force of gravity. It's always there.
Originally posted by Mactire
Would the gravitational effect be greater when the alignment was occuring, or during the "release" when the alignment passes? Probably the latter.
In essence, wouldn't it be likely that an earthquake resulting from some celestial gravitational anomaly be greater at the moment of release, say a day(+) after the alignment?
If you string a bunch of windchimes onto a rope and slowly pull the rope taut, they'll swing a bit, but the real "music" happens at that tiny flinch when that tension is released.edit on 27-4-2011 by Mactire because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nataylor
There is no "tension," or "release" or anything like that. It's not like an "alignment" increases the total force of gravity. It's always there.
Originally posted by Mactire
Would the gravitational effect be greater when the alignment was occuring, or during the "release" when the alignment passes? Probably the latter.
In essence, wouldn't it be likely that an earthquake resulting from some celestial gravitational anomaly be greater at the moment of release, say a day(+) after the alignment?
If you string a bunch of windchimes onto a rope and slowly pull the rope taut, they'll swing a bit, but the real "music" happens at that tiny flinch when that tension is released.edit on 27-4-2011 by Mactire because: (no reason given)
And your car probably has more gravitational influence on the Earth than Elenin will:
Elenin is estimated to be about 3 to 5 km in diameter. Comets have a density around 0.6 g/cm^3 (or 6 * 10^11 kg/km^3). So if we assume Elenin's diameter to be 5 km, it would have a volume around 65.4498 km^3. So it would have a mass of 65.4498 km^3 * 6 * 10^11 kg/km^3 = 3.92699 * 10^13 kg.
The mass of the earth is 5.9742 * 10^24 kg. We'll say your car weighs 2000 kg.
The gravitational force between two objects is (G*m1*m2)/(r^2) where G is the gravitational constant (6.67 * 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2)), m1 is the mass of the first object, m2 is the mass of the second object, and r is distance between their centers of mass.
At the time of the Christchurch earthquake, Elenin was about 904,856,192,000 m away. So there would have been a gravitational force between the comet and Earth of about 19,112 N. Your car, on surface of the Earth at a distance of about 6,378,000 m from the center of the Earth, would have a gravitational force of about 19,591 N.
So where were you parked that day?
Originally posted by ufoinquirer
if you look up leonid in russian on wikipedia, you get same story of meteor shower but i don't know what that name would mean to russianas in general (like if they would notice the significance)
Well, the first lesson of science is that correlation does not equal causation, but...
Originally posted by Helious
You don't find the data in your own post kinda strange...... At all? You know the Japan earthquake was predicted very accurately using NASA trajectory information right? There is going to be a 3-5 day window but your own data speaks to the fact that the object is related to all three.
Except that's not what we see. The first Earthquake, when Elenin was most distance, was 8.8. The second earthquake, when Elenin was much closer, was over 500 times less energy of the first one.
Originally posted by ufoinquirer
Originally posted by nataylor
Originally posted by Helious
Simply not true:
At 06:34:14 UTC on February 27, 2010, the time of the 8.8 Chile earthquake, the Earth and Elenin were separated by about 1° 04' 07" viewed from the sun. Elenin was actually most closely aligned with the Earth at only 0° 25' 21" of separation, at 05:20 UTC on February 26. 2010, or 1 day, 6 hours, and 14 minutes earlier.
Then there were 11 more earthquakes of 7.0 or higher.
At 16:35:46 UTC on September 03, 2010, the time of the 7.0 Christchurch earthquake, the Sun and Elenin were separated by about 1° 16' 38" viewed from Earth. Elenin was actually most closely aligned with the sun at only 0° 30' 22" at 04:35 UTC on September 05, 2010, or 1 day, 11 hours, and 59 minutes later.
Then there were 9 more earthquakes of 7.0 or higher.
At 05:46:23 UTC on March 11, 2011, the time of the 9.0 Japan earthquake, the Earth and Elenin were separated by about 3° 00' 00" viewed from the sun. Elenin was actually most closely aligned with the Earth at at only 0° 54' 21" at 13:00 UTC on March 14, 2011, or 3 day, 7 hours, and 14 minutes later.
You don't find the data in your own post kinda strange...... At all? You know the Japan earthquake was predicted very accurately using NASA trajectory information right? There is going to be a 3-5 day window but your own data speaks to the fact that the object is related to all three.
yeah and i would imagine the closer the comet gets, the precise patterns of alignment will vary -- i mean just think about it logically speaking : ) damage will get worse, earthquake activity will be worse which could also affect order of chain of events here on earth
Um I didn't read any of the replies but please tell me we're not all going to die...?
Originally posted by ufoinquirer
so what's interesting is if there is a cover up, we're kind of spinning our wheels trying to find evidence...so we'd have to look at evidnec eof cover up
i think it's weird youtube.com/9nania has not made a single post featuring her face or voice, you know she's aware of all the conspiracy around her
do you think she just wants people to think her account was taken over?
and that astropilot guy or whatever his name was, the pro-nibiru astronomy dude, all his stuff got removed...on GLP someone posted that he was arrested for sex crime...but it's like, why remove all the videos under your anonymous name along with being arrested ??
biggest sign of no cover up?
leonid elenin is CRAZY accessible and has even talked to me about all the conspiracy theories, haha, here's the latest:
Fun read, just sharing : ) - www.nasa.gov...
NASA - Can WISE Find the Hypothetical 'Tyche'?
www.nasa.gov
Leonid Elenin
Yes, hypothesis about hypothetical object
oh of course ! i just thought it would be a fun read for an astronomer : ) that we may indeed have a sun companion out there
only thing that annoys me is even though i was able to get into contact with many of his peers, and he hast races back to 2007, i can't find anyone who's MET the guy and he won't tell me why his parents named him that