It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cushycrux
Originally posted by MidnightTide
I just want to know when people thoughts things were so good?
Life has always been a struggle - as it should be.
I really can't understand those who say everything should be shared - that big government should take care of everyone.
Isn't it more blessed to give than receive?
Originally posted by beezzerYor "facts" don't fit the narritive.
Your "facts" have absolutely nothing to do with what I believe.
Originally posted by beezzerYou are too damned busy trying to define the Tea Party within your own narrow confines, along with many here...
Originally posted by beezzerYou might get the odd person fooled, but the rest of us who actually believe in doing something positive will look at you and the rest with something akin to sadness and pity for the shills you are for the media and the rest.
Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put tIle Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. TIle Rep should be made to feel tIlat a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington
If he blames
Bush for something or offers other excuses -- call him on it, yell back and have
someone else tallow-up with a shout-out.
people in their district
can see past the charade and are angry about the socialist agenda,
Source
-YOU have voted for a socialist agenda. Please explain why you believe a
soeialist approach to governing, as opposed to a free market approach is
optimum?
-Medicare and Medicare have
been financial f~lJlures. Point to a country where national health care has not been
rationed?
-Combined federal, state, property, sales, capital and misc. taxes confiscate
over 50%, and in some cases, 60%) of household income. Team Obama intends to
implement ADDITIONAL taxes in the form of health care, cap and trade,
punitive cafe standards, Il1creased marginal rate on the 'top' earners, (while .
expanded tax 'credits' to those who do not pay taxes, i,e, transferring income
from one household to another)How much do you believe a household should be
able to keep of their income?
-You have broken the back of the American
taxpayer. Just how much household debt do YOU think is enough?
Originally posted by iterationzero
Originally posted by neo96
last time i l checked alot of them ran as independents and some ran as republicans no doubt.
Of the ones who were elected last year, what percentage ran as Republicans?
Originally posted by iterationzero
ok you may not hate but the severe hatred for the right and the teaparties is nothing but political manipulation so the left maintains their control of this country and no its the same old tune just a new player that they want gone.
I don't hate the right any more than I hate the left. You keep assuming that I'm partisan when I'm not. No one in the current power structure wants the Tea Party gone - they invented the Tea Party. It's another distraction that further ensures that real change will never occur in this country.
politics are nothing but mass manipulation to get and maintain power you may see no differences but i do anyone who has been paying attention knows whats going on and the fact of the matter is the only "party" who hasnt screwed this country over are the teaparties.
Because the Tea Party is "new", even though its power base in D.C. consists of people who came straight out of the ranks of the Republican party.
Originally posted by cushycrux
To "libertytoall"
1. I got money
2. I got a bank
3. My money makes money
4. Makes more money
5. Even more
6. Even more and more
7. Until I have almost endless money
How can this work?
Why do even intelligent people don't see the obvious falsehood?! I mean it's so simple even a 5 year old would come to the logic, that this can't work. Mankind
And now tell me this is system has not to crash (in rage)...
edit on 24-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tbonethedstroyer
reply to post by OverMan
Your denial isn't fooling anyone here. The FED needs to be abolished ASAP.
You type like you are the only one that understands anything. . .Why would you support a system that is built on fractional reserve banking that prints more and more money and requires endless growth to be effective?
It's a big fail and you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. You are just repeating what you put down on your papers to pass a class.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Oh "keerist";don't make me get out my caps! "Perhaps that's because
THERE WERE NO "TEAPARTY" PRIMARIES!!!!
AS THE "TEA PARTY" IS A CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY NOT A NATIONAL POLITICAL PARTY!
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by cushycrux
To "libertytoall"
1. I got money
2. I got a bank
3. My money makes money
4. Makes more money
5. Even more
6. Even more and more
7. Until I have almost endless money
How can this work?
Why do even intelligent people don't see the obvious falsehood?! I mean it's so simple even a 5 year old would come to the logic, that this can't work. Mankind
And now tell me this is system has not to crash (in rage)...
edit on 24-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)
How can this work? Because money is a tool like a swinging hammer it can move people to voluntarily showup at 0900 to their cubicle to enter in to what libs and socialists call "slavery".
Any force ( from the falling contractors framing hammer to the200 ton mechanical punch press to theconomic force of money) canbe used to create things,dowork; which creates wealth.
Democratic party sources said the tickets for all three events started at $100 and ranged up to the maximum legal limit of $35,800.
All of the money raised goes to the Obama Victory Fund. Though officials declined to disclose a final tally, estimates suggest millions of dollars were raised from about 2,700 donors.
1. Balance of power implies equality of power. However, one's power balance means for another a power imbalance.
2. The doctrine of the harmony of interests / balance of power makes dissidence appear to be the source of chaos and disturbance.
3. The prime focus of the theory is the Congress, however its members are members of the upper classes and cannot actually be the representatives of the interests of the lower classes of the society. Furthermore, the power in congress comes with seniority, hence congress people will have to stay in the Congress as long as possible, which makes it impossible for them to become dissidents. In the mean time, the seniors manipulate and determine what will happen in the Congress. And the major issues of the electorate usually cannot find space in political campaigns, the congress itself, or even the congressional committees. If they come up, they are structured so that discussion is limited to certain viewpoints and the substantive issue will be stalemated. It is not the political power of the Congress, or that of key Congressmen, that has expanded and centralized.
4. The founding fathers' idea of a checks-and-balances-state is grounded in their belief in the US middle class as the stabilizer and the pivot of the class balance in the US. In contemporary US economy, however, the small entrepreneurs that once consisted the economy are replaced by a handful of centralized corporations. Moreover, the middle class has come to be dependent on the state and replaced by a new middle class (white-collar employees), whose jobs cannot provide them with tools (political freedom and economic security) to be independent, that is yet another part of the impotent mass society. Labour unions themselves became institutions that choose leaders and send them to corporate positions once those leaders become established.
5. The 'checks-and-balances' system is outdated and inapplicable to contemporary US political and economical life.
6. It assumes that the different balances that keep the society in equilibrium requires them to be independent of each other. However, none of them (labour, business, state, military and so on) are independent of each other any longer, and hence, they cannot be seen as elements of a balancing system.
7. Major interests do not compete with each other, but instead co-operate to promote several interests as they coincide.
8. The lobbies that are supposed to be checks-and-balances are now part of the state.
Originally posted by cushycrux
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by cushycrux
To "libertytoall"
1. I got money
2. I got a bank
3. My money makes money
4. Makes more money
5. Even more
6. Even more and more
7. Until I have almost endless money
How can this work?
Why do even intelligent people don't see the obvious falsehood?! I mean it's so simple even a 5 year old would come to the logic, that this can't work. Mankind
And now tell me this is system has not to crash (in rage)...
edit on 24-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)
How can this work? Because money is a tool like a swinging hammer it can move people to voluntarily showup at 0900 to their cubicle to enter in to what libs and socialists call "slavery".
Any force ( from the falling contractors framing hammer to the200 ton mechanical punch press to theconomic force of money) canbe used to create things,dowork; which creates wealth.
And from where does that money that didn't exist come from? Correct, it's stolen.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I just started reading this book,
en.wikipedia.org...
books.google.com... 0o&hl=en&ei=Gj-0TcmYEYTo0QGYsJD6CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=the%20elite%20fund%20both%20parties&f=false
well good luck with that link?
In a perfect world we all would be equal, no one would go hungry, be homeless, or go without health-care,
1. Balance of power implies equality of power. However, one's power balance means for another a power imbalance.
2. The doctrine of the harmony of interests / balance of power makes dissidence appear to be the source of chaos and disturbance.
3. The prime focus of the theory is the Congress, however its members are members of the upper classes and cannot actually be the representatives of the interests of the lower classes of the society. Furthermore, the power in congress comes with seniority, hence congress people will have to stay in the Congress as long as possible, which makes it impossible for them to become dissidents. In the mean time, the seniors manipulate and determine what will happen in the Congress. And the major issues of the electorate usually cannot find space in political campaigns, the congress itself, or even the congressional committees. If they come up, they are structured so that discussion is limited to certain viewpoints and the substantive issue will be stalemated. It is not the political power of the Congress, or that of key Congressmen, that has expanded and centralized.
4. The founding fathers' idea of a checks-and-balances-state is grounded in their belief in the US middle class as the stabilizer and the pivot of the class balance in the US. In contemporary US economy, however, the small entrepreneurs that once consisted the economy are replaced by a handful of centralized corporations. Moreover, the middle class has come to be dependent on the state and replaced by a new middle class (white-collar employees), whose jobs cannot provide them with tools (political freedom and economic security) to be independent, that is yet another part of the impotent mass society. Labour unions themselves became institutions that choose leaders and send them to corporate positions once those leaders become established.
5. The 'checks-and-balances' system is outdated and inapplicable to contemporary US political and economical life.
6. It assumes that the different balances that keep the society in equilibrium requires them to be independent of each other. However, none of them (labour, business, state, military and so on) are independent of each other any longer, and hence, they cannot be seen as elements of a balancing system.
7. Major interests do not compete with each other, but instead co-operate to promote several interests as they coincide.
8. The lobbies that are supposed to be checks-and-balances are now part of the state.
The elite have lost touch with the common man.
The fact of the matter is, we are all in the same boat and it is sinking, all we can do is sit back and watch, apparently, because politics has become the new religion for most and they won't allow a revival/reawakening,
Try to imagine everything you think you know is wrong, shake off the shackles.