It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Absolute Truth About The Tea Party!

page: 26
54
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Section31


When I became a registered voter last year, I signed up as an undeclared voter without a political party. Democrat and Republican voters who vote consistently for the same party are morons. Instead of having minds of their own, loyalists need instructions on how to think, behave, and live. Regardless about how messed up Democrats and Republican politicians become, loyalists will sell their souls to Satan if it means their party will win.

I am the party of me.
edit on 24-4-2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)


Well, if that's true, then you know you don't get to vote in Primaries as an independent, right?




posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

i am sure that if there woulda been a box that said teaparty alot of people would have voted for them.

3 choices are given on any ballot most times just 2 left right and independent.


What happened to libertarianism and constitutionalism? And why is the Paul family not libertarian rather than republican? They go out of their way to differentiate themselves from republicanism yet they choose the wrong party?

Does not make sense.............


and then agian the teaparty doesnt have the acceptance of the democrats and republicans.

you want to call them all republicans it is disingenous because they not all are.


edit on 23-4-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)


Most of the libertarians and tea partiers have a conservative background, in other words they are offshoots of the republican party. The republicans hate them because they divide the party in half, just like democrats hate socialists for the same reason.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


Exactly, the claim that the majority of those who now claim 'Tea Party" status arent people who voted for GW twice is absurd. Sure, I know a few libertarians who are tea party affiliates who dislike the neocons as much as they dislike the Democrats. But to pretend that the massive groundswell against 'big government' came JUST as the Dems took over the white house is absurd. And anyone who is TRULY part of the Ron Paul wing of the 'tea party' would READILY admit that it has been co-opted by the FreedomWorks agenda. Anyone who claims this isnt true is either lying or repeating lies.

But, then again this is what they do. Just like when Clinton was in office and we had the 'black helicopter' militia types who were against ALL government, who magically DISAPPEARED s soon as GW took office. Almost as if they are only against 'government' when a Democrat is in the WH.
edit on 24-4-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


probably the same reason the left runs under democrat and liberal

hell noone would vote for an open communist and socialist.

and then again the left and right are polar opposites.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
reply to post by meeneecat
 


Jane Mayer, of The New Yorker,
Media Matters,
Fox News Channel,
The Guardian.

and Oh My, Janeane Garofalo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If they are against the "Tea Party" maybe its time I consider joining them.

Has it occurred to anyone that Wealthy People maybe care about this country too? That not all of them are Globalist Traitors? Moreover, if you can't figure out who are the "Bad Guys", sometime looking at who are against this or that group may be way to seeing "The Truth".


edit on 24-4-2011 by MajorKarma because: Typos and expanded comment



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   
Wow, what a deceptive title for a thread. Nothing could be farther from the truth, actually. These videos are nothing more than liberal propaganda productions.

One thing I've always noticed about liberals, is that they never progressed past grade school with their "I know you are but what am I?" response to criticism. Whenever you see a liberal blaming someone for something, it's usually because they themselves are guilty of that exact behavior, and it's merely a method of deflecting criticism from themselves. It works well on stupid people, unfortunately. The rest of us know better.

Nice try, OP. More of the same form the left, as expected.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


american companies are over there because they have been run out of here.

no i was talking about the middle class because it is also their tax dollars that pay those people from their own hard work

and this is still about the middle class because the lower class benefits the most while two other classes are being destroyed all in the name of morality.

the people who employ the middle class is the upper class and with all those rules and regulations that are championed by the middle class is leading the way to its own destruction.

you dont like my views then stop talking to me was what i mean because it falls on deaf ears.

remember i am the antichrist.


I am not one of those people that ignores the opposition, because ignoring someone implies neutrality or silent consent, and that is far from the truth. I only ignore people as a last resort so I do not get penalised and/or banned from the site.

You keep making day into night and its annoying. I don't blame you for being brainwashed or protecting your own self-interests, which ever is the case, I am simply refuting your views/opinions because I strongly disagree with them.

The entire middle class of the world is getting screwed because too many people think like you...capitalism equals freedom and "everything else is slavery". I used to belive that 15 years ago because I only watched sports and celebrity shows in america and mainstream news occassionaly. The fact of the matter is both communism and capitalism boil down to slavery in different ways though. In the first case the government is all powerful with people becoming zombies of the state, while in the second case everyone becomes a slave to multi-national corporations due to extreme competition that eats up smaller companies, collects all the wealth from the proletariat and smaller companies and then uses that wealth to buy interest in government. In other words capitalism is cannibalistic to the core.

To capitalise means "to take advantage of"--as to capitalise on someones mistake for your advantage. Look up *capitalise* in the dictionary!



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


brainwashed eh

slavery eh

tell you what slave of the government is what i do agree with theres no choice whatsoever.

slave of a corporation is what i do not agree with and heres why you dont have to work for one and you dont have to buy any of there products.

and to capitalize by your definition is to take ones self out of the loop so to speak

and become your own master and that is the beauty of capitalism.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by OptimusSubprime

Originally posted by cushycrux

Originally posted by 46ACE

Originally posted by cushycrux
To "libertytoall"

1. I got money
2. I got a bank
3. My money makes money
4. Makes more money
5. Even more
6. Even more and more
7. Until I have almost endless money

How can this work?











Why do even intelligent people don't see the obvious falsehood?! I mean it's so simple even a 5 year old would come to the logic, that this can't work. Mankind


And now tell me this is system has not to crash (in rage)...


edit on 24-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)


How can this work? Because money is a tool like a swinging hammer it can move people to voluntarily showup at 0900 to their cubicle to enter in to what libs and socialists call "slavery".
Any force ( from the falling contractors framing hammer to the200 ton mechanical punch press to theconomic force of money) canbe used to create things,dowork; which creates wealth.


And from where does that money that didn't exist come from? Correct, it's stolen.


Who stole it and who was it stolen from? (I already know what your answer will be.) The only people stealing money from those that earned it is the federal government.


No. It's stolen money from the poor people's taxes that's taken from the bank credits they all have.

edit on 24-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:16 PM
link   
So if everything is shared equally with everyone, why in the hell am I going to get up early every morning to go to work......just do what I want when I want.....I am going to get my equal share anyway.

Again, nice ideals - but the flaw is when you input people into the equation.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by MidnightTide
So if everything is shared equally with everyone, why in the hell am I going to get up early every morning to go to work......just do what I want when I want.....I am going to get my equal share anyway.

Again, nice ideals - but the flaw is when you input people into the equation.


What does that comment have to do with the thread or OP whatsoever?

second



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Wow, what a deceptive title for a thread. Nothing could be farther from the truth, actually. These videos are nothing more than liberal propaganda productions.


Well, if they are 'propaganda', then it should be quite easy to list what about the videos is untrue.

Dick Armey? FeedomWorks? Fox? All lies you say?


One thing I've always noticed about liberals, is that they never progressed past grade school with their "I know you are but what am I?" response to criticism

Whenever you see a liberal blaming someone for something, it's usually because they themselves are guilty of that exact behavior, and it's merely a method of deflecting criticism from themselves. It works well on stupid people, unfortunately. The rest of us know better.



OH! I get it. You are going for irony. Doing exactly what you claim the 'other' is doing! Nice one! Blindly dismiss facts and throw in some name-calling, while at the same time complaining about how 'they' dismiss facts and only ave name calling! Brilliant satire!


edit on 24-4-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: fix quotes



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


probably the same reason the left runs under democrat and liberal

hell noone would vote for an open communist and socialist.

and then again the left and right are polar opposites.


I am one of those people that puts idealism above power so despite the fact ron paul and rand paul make some good arguements against the corporate empire, he is making a bafoon of himself by running as a republican.

Just my opinion. I personally would vote for a socialist everytime but I moved to greece about 10 years ago and it is difficult to vote. Have to leave my job and travel hundreds of miles to go to the embassy and vote. Not worth it!

Please if your a libertarian THEN VOTE LIBERTARIAN...its the only way to rid ourselves of the two party monopoly!



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by MidnightTide
So if everything is shared equally with everyone, why in the hell am I going to get up early every morning to go to work......just do what I want when I want.....I am going to get my equal share anyway.

Again, nice ideals - but the flaw is when you input people into the equation.


What does that comment have to do with the thread or OP whatsoever?

second


Are you even reading this thread at all?

My comment has everything to do with what is being discussed in this thread....and is in response to several posts that I have been having with other people in this thread.


reply to post by cushycrux
 


Good enough for you?
edit on 24-4-2011 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by MidnightTide
 


Yes, I see you ideological discussion that has nothing to do with the info in the OP.

I was just wondering if you could even TRY and connect it to the OP, but it appears you cant



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


and my opinion you need to reevaluate your position of where socliasm ends history has proven time and time agian

that it doesn't end up well.

i lean right i have called my self a conservative and a republican and want a strict adherence to the us constitution

the us constitution is the highest form of idealism in this land.

and nowhere in that document does it take take from the rich and give to the poor and legislate success.
edit on 24-4-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

i lean right i have called my self a conservative and a republican and want a strict adherence to the us constitution

the us constitution is the highest form of idealism in this land.



I just want to quote that for posterity since you have said in several places that you think all government is bad, have denied being a Republican, and have said 'all tax is theft'.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Great videos but no real new there,anyone who associates with the tea party movement have serious issues with themselves..The fat cats of America and around the world are sitting back with there big cigars and laughing all the way to the bank on who they have manipulated these unfortunate people into thinking they will save them from the boogie man..IMO



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
 


dude a republican understand my definition of what a republican is not what is spouted off on this site time and time again

i am someone who wants a strict adherence to the constitution and since the us was founded as a republic

that makes me a republican.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


I was talking about western european socialism--france, uk, spain, portugal, netherlands, belgium, denmark, norway, sweden, finland, germany, switzerland, italy, greece, austria

NOT soviet "socialism"--that was a euphanism for communism. Communism always had the worst reputation of the three systems because everyone was a slave to the state/nation/union.

And western european socialism has its flaws as well due to the central bankers in germany controlling the EU and forcing member "states" unpopular legislation. You see private central banking IS the "nwo" actually OWO..Old World Order aka bourgeoisie status quo rightfully denigrated in marxist literature.

Ron Paul to his credit wants to take down the FED but then goes on to say we need another private currency to replace the current private currency. And then says it should be backed with gold/silver as though there is enough gold/silver to account for all the currency.



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join