It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by die_another_day
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by die_another_day
How about each person that requires a resource be allowed to creatively use the resource.
Or.. you distribute it the same way everything else is distributed. How do you think all the JUNK gets from China to the US Walmarts?? DAILY.
There is no distribution problem.
With property rights, courts, patents, and HOARDING behavior.
How can resources be "distributed?"
Originally posted by bettermakings
Sub-Saharan Africa could literally feed the whole world, without destroying any virgin rainforest.
So where IS overpopulated?
Asia
Overpopulation? Elitest Propaganda and Damned Lies
Originally posted by Viking9019
I've never believed in overpopulation and i've read somewhere that the entire worlds population could fit into Australia and have enough land and food to survive.
Originally posted by rwfresh
Originally posted by die_another_day
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by die_another_day
How about each person that requires a resource be allowed to creatively use the resource.
Or.. you distribute it the same way everything else is distributed. How do you think all the JUNK gets from China to the US Walmarts?? DAILY.
There is no distribution problem.
With property rights, courts, patents, and HOARDING behavior.
How can resources be "distributed?"
Suicidal behavior (Greed, hoarding, fear of lack of resources) are not consistent with reality. So maybe the first question would be how do we encourage reality? Or eliminate delusion? Just by living in reality and not propagating unreal myths like "overpopulation" is a start.edit on 18-4-2011 by rwfresh because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WhiteHat
Sorry to burst your little bubble, but this utopia looks very nice on paper, from the comfort of your western living room, thrown with such generosity into the virtual world of internet, which, by the way, only about 20% of the world population have access to.
At least 80% of humanity live on less than $10/day.
At least 22,000 children DIE EACH DAY due to poverty.
Some 1.1 billion people in developing countries have inadequate access to water, and 2.6 billion lack basic sanitation.
And there is a lot more to talk about that.
If this seems like "there is more than enough for everyone", then I agree with you; overpopulation is not a problem at all. Let's bring some more.
But in the meantime here is a nice video based on reality, about the BIG WORLD, and it's real overpopulation problems.
The World in 10 Seconds
I really, really recommend this video to anyone not sure about overpopulation.
Let's deny ignorance.
edit on 18-4-2011 by WhiteHat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by wcitizen
IMO the overpopulation story is a myth designed to form a (sick) rationale for a huge population cull. The real reason for the cull is so they end up with numbers they can FULLY CONTROL. They know they can't control current population numbers if enough of us rebel.
I'll roll with this reasoning for a second.
So how many of "them" are there?
10,000? 100,000? 1,000,000?
Let's go with a million...
okay, so right now we're almost at 7 billion, so the ratio of "us vs them" would be roughly 7,000-1
so they kill 80% of us, and now the ratio is 1,400-1
How is that much more manageable?
Try again, please.
Originally posted by WhiteHat
At least 80% of humanity live on less than $10/day.
At least 22,000 children DIE EACH DAY due to poverty.
Some 1.1 billion people in developing countries have inadequate access to water, and 2.6 billion lack basic sanitation.
And there is a lot more to talk about that.
If this seems like "there is more than enough for everyone", then I agree with you; overpopulation is not a problem at all. Let's bring some more.
But in the meantime here is a nice video based on reality, about the BIG WORLD, and it's real overpopulation problems.
Originally posted by Jonas86
Forests are being destroyed, millions of years old ecosystems chopped down to lumber. That's enough for overpopulation for me. We don't need billions of people.
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by Amaterasu
Uh adding 100 million people in under 50 years is not maintaining.
A 33% increase in population in a mere 4 or 5 decades is skyrocketing, not remaining stable.