It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Is Long Valley Supervolcano Activating? Swarm Just started

page: 16
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in


posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 04:56 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

The Japan quakes affect YV and the quakes in guam, philippines, Hawaii appear to go more directly to LV. Japan is more YV, sorry. Check it out! I might add that on 3/11/11 LV area seismographs were pretty impressive too.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 05:04 PM
reply to post by TrueAmerican

I edited my post to say it was there for 20 hours before I saw this.

Memory? I had one of those once!

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 05:05 PM
reply to post by kissitgoodbye

You can get Yellowstone seismograms back to 2003 from Is This Thing On

This is a site run by an ATS member.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 05:12 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

Hi, yeah I know, he's in my facvorites. Went back to look at the siesmic data for 3/11 and it's been altered. So much for credible sources. Thanks for your links, I have most already tho.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 06:29 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

Well....that is the closet thing I have heard to soon as I heard it it clicked! What a scary thought....I still have not heard it since a few weeks ago, but if I do, I will record it for you.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 06:32 PM


edit on 16-4-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 06:48 PM
What is REALLY going on?

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 07:21 PM

Originally posted by PuterMan
I would say no to that. Harmonics are harmonics where ever they are. It really would not matter if it was a supervolcano or gas escaping from a pipe.

Re HAARP and how it could set off a quake... (No they didn't but

Harmonic resonance...

HAARP is based on TESLA tech. Tesla nearly brought down a building in New York using that tech. He had to destroy the device before the resonance would stop... I hear he used an Axe. The Russians caused earth tremors with a scalar energy experiment that they almost couldn't stop... that experiment was one of the big success stories with the CIA remote viewing team. The Russians also destroyed the facility to stop the shaking...

URDF-3 (Unidentified Research and Development Facility-3)
Baikal-1, Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan
50°10'12.69"N, 78°22'36.84"W

The ruins are still visible on GE including the huge gantry crane that the remote viewers accurately drew.

It is from these two incidents that the stories (and blame) on HAARP sprang up from

Harmonic Resonance is very destructive... however there does not appear to be a safe way to control it once set in motion... and HAARP sits on one of the most active seismic regions on Earth

So can they? yes... do they? no way
And I really love the way everyone blames HARRP, yet is oblivious to all the other arrays around the world

From the voice of an opera singer, to a 41.5 mph breeze, once Harmonic Resonance is set in motion... destruction is assured

"Gallopin' Gertie"

edit on 16-4-2011 by zorgon because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 07:51 PM

Originally posted by kissitgoodbye
reply to post by PuterMan

Hey PM,
Thanks for the welcome. I don't mind getting my head bit off occasionally! lol! I actually got the latitude theory when the Japan quake hit and I was looking at the Yellowstone seismic data for that time frame and during the initial big aftershocks. They were the most impressive seismographs I have seen. The data has been altered from the original seismic data that was up that day. The charts were recording harmonic tremor for areas within the cauldera and a lot of breakage . Charts were solid red, green blue and black the entire day. No surprise it's gone now, wish I had printed it out. I showed it to someone else at that time and they said that the design would be great on a t shirt! Anyway, another source on this thread actually mentioned the relationship between the latitude of the Japan quakes and Long Valley too.
If you check out the world earthquake map on USGS and see where the Japan quakes are located then look to California, it's pretty direct. Seems quakes over there vary a little up or down some affecting Yellowstone, some Long Valley. Also, on USGS home page earthquake map for the USA, look at how the earthquakes are lining up between the Long Valley area and curving up toward Yellowstone thru Nevada and Utah toward Wyoming. Also, if you look at the depth of the earthquakes in Japan, they vary with the magma chamber depths for Long Valley and Yellowstone. When the 9.0 hit Japan it was 6 miles down, the depth of the magma chamber for Yellowstone. Don't remember if it was Bob Smith, or Bob Christensen, but one of them mentioned that the top of the magma chamber was 6 miles down at that time and that if it was compromised to 3 miles down, it would be of serious concern. I don't know what the depth is now of the YV magma chamber, but that 9.0 did some serious breakage toward the surface. Your thoughts? Have a good one!

Don't know much about where your going with this but just one clarification in regards to magma depth. It's not important in regards to eruptions but rather the amount of gas contained within it.

What I mean by that is it won't start rising to the surface until the conditions are correct for that to happen, gas content and pressure applied. If you could link comments from these 2 about how this is a concern I would appreciate to see their reasoning.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 08:01 PM

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 08:25 PM
4.6 NEVADA38.40°N -118.72°W 0Km Deep 2011-04-17 00:45:37 UTC2011-04-16 16:45:37 LOCAL NN00333401

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 08:33 PM

40 minutes in Nevada, 00:44:29 UTC to 01:24:30 UTC:

Sunday April 17 2011, 01:24:30 UTC 6 minutes ago Nevada 1.3 0.8 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:19:25 UTC 11 minutes ago Nevada 3.3 0.0 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:19:25 UTC 11 minutes ago Nevada 3.3 0.0 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:15:13 UTC 16 minutes ago Nevada 1.9 0.0 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:14:12 UTC 17 minutes ago Nevada 1.4 5.9 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:05:03 UTC 26 minutes ago Nevada 2.9 0.0 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:02:48 UTC 28 minutes ago Nevada 2.2 1.7 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 00:57:50 UTC 33 minutes ago Nevada 3.5 0.0 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 00:55:46 UTC 35 minutes ago Nevada 4.1 13.2 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 00:45:37 UTC 45 minutes ago Nevada 4.6 15.4 Detail
Sunday April 17 2011, 00:44:29 UTC 46 minutes ago Nevada 1.7 8.6

From USGS:

MAP 3.3 2011/04/17 01:19:26 38.343 -118.850 0.0 NEVADA
MAP 2.9 2011/04/17 01:05:04 38.343 -118.806 0.0 NEVADA
MAP 3.5 2011/04/17 00:57:50 38.362 -118.739 0.0 NEVADA
MAP 4.1 2011/04/17 00:55:46 38.369 -118.728 13.2 NEVADA
MAP 4.6 2011/04/17 00:45:37 38.394 -118.735 15.4 NEVADA

edit on 16/4/11 by soficrow because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 08:36 PM


Here's the update:

3.3 NEVADA38.34°N -118.85°W 0Km Deep 2011-04-17 01:19:25 UTC2011-04-16 17:19:25 LOCAL NN00333422 0
I 3.5 NEVADA38.36°N -118.74°W 0Km Deep 2011-04-17 00:57:50 UTC2011-04-16 16:57:50 LOCAL NN00333407 0
I 4.1 NEVADA38.37°N -118.73°W 13Km Deep 2011-04-17 00:55:46 UTC2011-04-16 16:55:46 LOCAL NN00333406 0
IV 4.6 NEVADA38.40°N -118.72°W 0Km Deep 2011-04-17 00:45:37 UTC2011-04-16 16:45:37 LOCAL NN00333401

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 08:43 PM
The 3.5 has just been upgraded to a 3.6

3.6 NEVADA38.36°N -118.74°W 14Km Deep 2011-04-17 00:57:50 UTC2011-04-16 16:57:50 LOCAL

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 09:08 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

Hi PM. Just thought you might want to see the Operation Solid Curtain/Citadel exercise for "11". You cited "09". They change it a little every year. Check out your site and navy compass Feb.22, 2011. Navy.Mil only addresses what is going on in Hawaii. Navy Compass discusses more about the nation wide exercise and what is going to happen in San Diego during the exercise. They discuss the exercise being much larger to include local govt., the Red Cross, FEMA and all of DOD NATION WIDE, not just Navy. It is not just related to localized threats by terrorists on boats as in the past. It is large scale threats as well, NATION WIDE! I'm still thinking this one is being practiced to respond to super eruptions at LV and YV creating the "solid curtain" of ash, nuclear dirty bomb stuff from the afore mentioned sources and destruction across the US regardless of what they "say" they are practicing for. Also throw in New Madrid in the mix. They aren't about to tip their hand at this point. The red flags to me are the Red Cross, Local Govt., DOD wide, and the current activity at LV and YV.
Food for Thought!

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 09:12 PM
Sunday April 17 2011, 01:19:26 UTC 51 minutes ago Nevada 3.7 11.8km

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 10:47 PM
A Few Notable Quakes from the Past




Just thinking out loud for a second here, so don't quote me on anything. None of it is backed up with more than a glance, and trying to imagine what might be happening.

As you can see, the most recent swarms in this area seem to be migrating to the northeast, assuming (and that's a big assumption) the same processes are involved in each one.

I can't help but notice the similarity between the movement of these swarms, and the history of the scars created by the Yellowstone Caldera, that being from the SW to the NE throughout history.

Those were created as the North American plate drifted to the Southwest over a hot spot deep under the continent.

Perhaps the recent earthquake off the coast of Japan took a bit of pressure off the western edge of the North American plate, allowing it to advance a bit, causing a few bumps and scrapes as the Pacific plate subducts or twists counter-clockwise putting pressure up through the Furnace Creek and White Mountain fault systems, and into the Wassauk Range Fault. I'm not familiar enough to have a clue whether it would maintain that kind of rigidity through the pacific spreading zone though.

We did have a few swarms at the South end of the Sierra Nevada Fault around China Lake last year (which is basically an extention of the the White Mountain/Owens Vally Fault zone) N of the Garlock fault, and those continue today. Not too far SW of that, (where the Garlock Fault intersects) the San Andreas appears to form a bend, and is most likely locked into the Pacific plate.

Regardless of the cause, be it Magmatic, Hydrolic, or a simple fault slip, I'm sure we'll get more answers once it's been studied some.

Again, don't yell at me, I just thought I'd blab a little and add a few pictures to ponder.

I'll be heading down to the area tomorrow with my camera and a good lunch, maybe I'll catch a little shaker.

Hopefully I won't get gassed.

edit on 16-4-2011 by lernmore because: I KNOW I didn't type "the" twice, always does that to me... puts words in my mouth.

posted on Apr, 16 2011 @ 11:22 PM
reply to post by kro32

My concern is not the magma depth, but breakage of the bottom of the crust above the magma chamber through the use of manufactured earthquakes. My understanding is that earthquakes at a certain magnitude above a magma chamber can cause crustal breakage allowing the pressure of the gas and magma below to rise toward the surface. If these earthquakes are generated at the same depth as the bottom of the crust above the magma chamber over and over, the magma would rise much faster because the bottom of the crust would continue to erode and become shallower eventually causing an eruption. I'd like input from some of you experts on crustal fracturing above magma chambers. I believe that Bob Smith or Bob Christensen mentioned something about breakage at the bottom of the crust by earthquakes at yellowstone and that the bottom of the crust at that time was 6 miles down. Thats the same level as the Japan earthquake which caused significant breakage at yellowstone that day at that level. I also know that you guys don't think that haarp can do this. To me there are just to many coincedences with the location of the earthquakes and their effect on areas that can cause the most destruction here for it to be naturally occurring events. I'm not an expert and if I am wrong, please teach me what part I don't understand, but be nice! Thanks

posted on Apr, 17 2011 @ 12:26 AM
One flaw in your logic...WHY would 'they' want to trigger LV when the whole area is surrounded by their main bases? Hawrthorn, Fallon, China Lake, Edwards to name a few?

Makes no sense

posted on Apr, 17 2011 @ 12:35 AM
reply to post by TrueAmerican

Man, all this earthquake activity is starting to freak me out. I wish I could look at a chart of earthquakes per year/per month/per week, by region. Some say "we've always had natural disasters, always will". But I have a strong feeling that "they" are wrong. I bet the quakes are much more frequent in today's time. Who knows though, I've been wrong before. Flag

new topics

top topics

<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in