It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yissachar1
A lot of people on this site have probably never left mommy let alone been to the middle east.. 9 out of 10 israelis are military trained to the highest standards because of conscription.. Yet the gazans would poke and prod even after israeli concessions including gaza. Like most of the land was worthless desert until they SOLD it to us and the rest we WON in war with the WHOLE Arab world...
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
The International Court of Justice and the international community say these settlements are illegal,[3][4] and no government supports Israel's settlements.[5] Israel disputes the position of the international community.[6] The United Nations has repeatedly upheld the view that Israel's construction of settlements constitutes violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.[7] Israel dismantled 18 settlements in the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, and all 21 in the Gaza Strip and 4 in the West bank in 2005.[8]
Originally posted by gravitational
reply to post by backinblack
Now go and read the 4th Geneva convention, and you will realize it does not apply when a nation is not the attacker or the aggressor.
Do some reading here:
www.palestinefacts.org...
You can twist reality all day long, but Israel struck first in 1967 as a preemptive measure only. Failing to do so and Israel would have been wiped of the map.
I suspect you are too young to live in those days or remember it, but it was well known all over the world that a joint Arab attack on Israel is imminent. Arab leaders certainly did not hide their intentions.
and you will realize it does not apply when a nation is not the attacker or the aggressor.
You seriously can't tell the difference between a preemptive strike to an imminent war, to starting a war?
I'm not surprised when it comes to you.