reply to post by 2manyquestions
Thank you for your response.
Sounds like your Dad had witnessed a similar set of maneuvers I had seen when I was 12 years old.
As to the question of why do some UFOs glow at night, the answer is that it may depend on the power plant they use to generate the anti-gravitic
field. Some physicists and aeronautical engineers claiming to have worked reverse or back engineering crashed ET UFOs, further claim that the advanced
power plants used by ET UFOs use magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) propulsion. MHD causes an incidental glow of the craft possibly because of the interaction
between the intense fields produced by the UFOs' MHD power plant, and the molecules in our atmosphere
Some other physicists and aeronautical engineers who claim to have worked in places such as Area 51 or Groom Lake in Nevada, and further claim to have
been involved in reverse engineering recovered UFOs that have crashed, or been shot down by Air Defense installations, have claimed that some of the
UFOs are manufactured by human beings, working in Area 51 and use a plasma ring to generate a magnetic field disrupting the force of gravity. The way
I understand this, is that the plasma accelerates within the ring, in much the same way that protons (or Hydrogen nuclei) are accelerated in particle
accelerators such as the Large Hadron Collider or LHC built by CERN in Europe. For some experiments the LHC can accelerate plasma in the form of
A fast rotating plasma can generate quite a large rotating magnetic field. In one scientific paper, published by the Russian Academy of Sciences, the
researchers report of their building a heavy version Searl Effect Generator weighing 350kg or 771.62lbs, (the SEG used neodymium magnets; 110kg of
magnets were used to manufacture the stator, and 115kg to manufacture the rotor) to investigate non-linear magnetic effects in a rotating magnetic
field machine. The Russian investigators Roschin and Godin have reported when their Searl Effect Generator is rotated to 550rpm, the change in weight
of the machine changes to 35%. If I interpret the English language translation correctly, this seems to be that the machine weighs 35% of its original
350kg or 771.62lbs, which calculates to 122.5kg or 270.07lbs. What does this interesting research have to do with plasma particle accelerators? The
answer is that some physicists or engineers have speculated on the design of a triangular shaped UFO, built and flown by the US Air Force the size of
a football field, that has a ring like structure inside it thought to be a particle accelerator using a mercury plasma. When this plasma is
accelerating inside the ring, the weight of the UFO has been estimated to change between 30% to 10% of its original weight, allowing for the use of
comparatively small rockets that can lift the entire UFO out of the ground, and using other rockets to maneuver it horizontally.
Essentially the Russian Academy of Sciences' sponsored SEG experiment with a rotating machine, confirms the same effect as is claimed for the 50,000
rpm rotating heavy ion, or mercury ion plasma in the ring shaped particle accelerator or synchrotron, thought to be used in the USAF's triangular
Here is a web site that reports on an eyewitness account of a football field sized triangular UFO:
One web site claims an up to 89% mass reduction of the vehicle weight or to put it another way, the vehicle weighs 11% of its original weight when the
mercury ion plasma is rotating at 50,000 rpm, and a consequential reduction in the g-Forces the pilots must endure, using a mercury ion plasma for
triangular shaped UFOs:
Here is another web site with a technical pdf attempting to analyse the aerodynamic properties of triangular shaped UFOs:
The physicists and aeronautical engineers who claim to have back or reverse engineered crashed ET UFOs have further claimed that due to these
non-human manufactured UFOs using anti-gravity generators, an incidental side benefit is the reduction in g-Forces in the crew cabin. This allows the
craft to accelerate at a phenomenal rate and the crew only feel mild or tolerable g-Forces. The way I understand how this works, is that the
anti-gravitic field that allows the craft to rise off the ground is repelling gravity, and once you have almost no gravity, then there are no g-Forces
because when you look at Newton's equation for Force due to gravity, F = mg, where g is the acceleration due to gravity or 32 feet/second/second, and
if you generate an anti-gravitic field with a vector direction opposite to the gravity vector, then g becomes almost zero. If g tends to be almost
zero, then you have almost zero opposite reaction, and thus almost zero g-Forces. Of course these physicists and aeronautical engineers allege that
the ETs can control the strength of the anti-gravitic field, or even generate artificial gravity within the UFO's crew cabin, so they can maintain
the gravity inside the UFO at say 1g. For horizontal maneuvering, they have other anti-gravitic generators that can permit the UFO to travel in any
desired direction, and have gravity generators to cancel out the effects from horizontal g-Forces.
Since our level of technology is not able yet to replicate the power plants used by non-human manufactured UFOs, the best we have done so far, is to
generate a magnetic field disruption or MFD that disrupts the gravitational force, and thus using rotating magnetic fields is not generating
anti-gravitic forces. In one sense we have done pretty well, and if we accept the claims of the physicists and aeronautical engineers who say they
have worked in Area 51; considering we humans have started to reverse engineer these ET craft since the mid-1940's, and 50 years later have come up
with a triangular craft using fast rotating mercury ions in a ring shaped particle accelerator or synchrotron, I think we are doing Ok.
According to one of the web sites, whose URL I posted above, is that the observed glow comes from the liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen rocket exhausts
used to maneuver the triangular shaped UFO built by humans. The burning of hydrogen in the presence of oxygen produces water vapour. Such rockets used
by any air craft, be it human or ET built, has the advantage that it leaves no exhaust trace; no evidence there was any craft in the area because when
you sample the air, all you get is water vapour, and water vapour is a common component of the Earth's atmosphere.
What limits our ability to build a working anti-gravity field generator, in my opinion, may be our inability to successfully construct a physical
theory combining Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity theory. Once we devise a coherent theory of Quantum Gravity, that can predict the existence
of anti-gravity, we may be able to run physics experiments to test those predictions. If these experiments do allow the construction of an
anti-gravity generator using our currently understoond theories on electromagnetism, then we will have true UFO propulsion technology. This is because
anti-gravity generators will not only cancel out the weight of the UFO craft itself, but it will also provide propulsion for the craft..
Here is an interesting web site on Dr. Robert Wood, a Physicist, Aeronautical Engineer and retired Deputy Director of McDonnell Douglas:
There was an earlier saucer shaped military built air craft called Project Silverbug, that was designed in the mid-1950's:
Another point is that for human pilots, navigation lights are used in any flying craft as a safety measure, to avoid having other aircraft collide
with it. I think that ET UFOs also have their lights on for similar reasons. In the past there have been commercial pilots reporting near misses with
UFOs, and they managed to swerve to avoid a mid-air collision once they noticed the UFOs' navigation lights. In some cases human pilots have noticed
shimmering disks during daylight hours. Collisions between human aircraft and ET UFOs may have been caused by either pilot not noticing the other's
craft. Compared with the primitive biplanes of 1914, our modern jet fighters have the most advanced technologies, yet they still manage to crash due
to some system failure, or the pilot not being on the ball during the flight, or sometimes fuel lines get clogged up causing a turbine stall or jet
flame out. Even ET UFOs may be subject to similar types of accidents.
Flying at night no matter how advanced the technology human or ET developed, is always risky, particularly when flying at low altitudes. Even with the
best night vision technology it is always difficult to spot objects such as power lines. These are hard enough to see in the daytime. This is why
human pilots including military pilots have a minimum altitude of 3m above a clear field, and higher over built-up areas to avoid colliding with power
lines, or two storey houses. I would expect ET UFO pilots to follow similar flight rules, if they want to avoid wrapping their saucer around a high
tension electrical cable support tower. Reports of UFOs hovering over houses, always have them either flying at a very slow speed compared to
conventional winged aircraft, or dropping vertically from a height if the house they want to hover over is located in the suburbs. This seems to
indicate that no matter if the UFOs are of human origin or ET manufacture, they are careful to avoid colliding with anything.
If you have many questions in your mind, the best way to deal with them is to write them down somewhere, then look up the answers by using Google and
read up on serious scientific web sites. Be careful to make sure you learn to recognise the difference between disinformation, misinformation,
anecdotal evidence (i.e. evidence from only one source), hoaxes and people asking you for money to download a report or something or other. There are
many free sources of information out there, some are bad and some are good, and out of the some that are good, some are fakes, hoaxes or someone's
silly idea of a joke.
I am in my late 40's and have done much research into the subject of UFOs. I am also an electronics engineer, and part of the reason I became an
electronics engineer is my interest in technology, another part is that electronics engineering is the only University course that exposes one to
physics, chemistry, mathematics, software engineering, and engineering science. This includes electromagnetic theory formulated by James Clerk
Maxwell, and Quantum Mechanical theory, with a little bit of Special Relativity. Another reason is because I reached the conclusion that the best way
for anybody to understand how UFOs work, is to learn as much advanced mathematics and science, including biology to better understand how the body is
affected by g-Forces and powerful magnetic fields or electrostatic fields.
What upsets me most about my amateur investigations in the field of UFO, is the time required to separate truth from lies. I dislike people who fake
an UFO photo or video because in their attempts at jokes, or trying to get noticed by the media, they are discrediting genuine UFO witnesses such as
myself, your Dad or my brother. My brother saw those five or seven lights flying very fast in a South to North direction, (because he was standing
next to me) disappearing into the North horizon, but he has refused to ever talk about it.
There are people who fake photos or videos to demonstrate how easy it is to fake anything with the software image processing tools available today,
but I wish they'd put a disclaimer at the end of their videos, or somewhere in the photo. Otherwise these image files get circulated around the
Internet very quickly, almost going "viral" and soon the Chinese Whispers Effect takes over, and all sorts of stories end up popping out about
alleged UFO encounters and alleged abductions that didn't really occur.
In the web site about Dr Robert Wood, have a read of the long pdf analysis by a former NASA employee Dr Richard C. Henry, where he talks about the Tar
Baby syndrome that afflicts any serious researcher who is interested in studying UFOs.You can access this interesting pdf document by scrolling down
almost to the end of the web site, and clicking on the link: UFOs and NASA.
Here is Dr. Henry's personal web site:
Dr. Henry is involved with SETI or the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, which is a more traditionally hard core scientific study of
discovering the presence of Extra Terrestrials in our local region of our Galaxy.
If you adopt a real scientific method approach, do not allow your mind to get trapped by thinking in terms of paradigms (not an easy thing to do in my
experience), try not to pre-judge and ridicule people's eyewitness accounts, until you can gather enough evidence from more than one credible source
taking the time in sorting out lies/fiction from the truth, make up your mind once you've examined the evidence always keeping an open mind just in
From my almost 30 years' experience in investigating and thinking about the UFO phenomenom, I have thought some accounts were genuine until I learned
that going from one eyewitness account is unreliable. It is best to look at different accounts from different people, and look at the common
I found Dr Robert Woods' name from a short promotional online video about the upcoming movie Battle: L.A., Googling his name led me to the web site I
posted above. Another name mentioned in the promotional online video is Dr. Bruce Maccabee. I wondered why his name sounded familiar to me, and I
remembered that a few months ago, I download a Power Point presentation, in which Dr Maccabee, a physicist, has statistically analysed the UFO
eyewitness reports, and found that 33% of UFO sightings are of unknown objects; i.e. objects that cannot explained away as natural or human made
objects such as aircraft not properly identified as such (except for human made UFOs, they'd be in the 33% of sightings).
Here is a web site on Dr. Bruce Maccabee's bio:
Essentially I check the credentials of UFO investigators, to sort out the serious researchers from the blind believers or the blind skeptics, in
either case of these "blind" people, they have pre-judged the evidence one way or the other. Dr Robert Wood and Dr Bruce Maccabee in my opinion,
have taken the middle ground, have carefully and seriously researched eyewitness accounts of UFO sightings, and used the Scientific Method properly
taking care not to abuse this powerful tool to analyse the mountains of data.
Another serious researcher for whom I also have respect is Stanton T. Friedman, a nuclear physicist who took the bold step of analysing for himself
the mountains of UFO eyewitness reports, and concluded that there was a significant number of cases that merited further serious and open minded
scientific study. He rejected the idea that all UFO eyewitness reports were misidentifications, hoaxes or fakes. He is specifically interested in
flying saucers which in his opinion present evidence that these objects are of Extra Terrestrial manufacture, and are under the intelligent control of
Here is Stanton T. Friednman's bio:
Stanton T. Friedman's web site: