posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 10:14 PM
reply to post by Xcathdra
Actually it was not Pakistan, it was Saudi Arabia that they agreed to turn him over to, with no evidence provided, if the US would stop bombing their
country. Which is something I laid out quite well in one of my previous postings which you choose to ignore the majority of. In addition, I provided
countless sources which show why the Taliban did not turn over Osama Bin Laden, which clearly you choose to ignore as well, and no where in their
statements to they make any demands that he be tried under Sharia Law. They asked for evidence, which could not be provided because the FACT is there
is no evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. Zero, Zip, Nada, Nothing. Again, you might want to go back to my previous post and actually read what
I have also ignored nothing and proved no point you are attempting to make. The only thing I blame the Bush Administration for is being a puppet like
most of our politicians are, as well as the actual invasion of Afghanistan. You can attempt to lay blame on anyone else you would like, but it was the
Bush Administration who used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Afghanistan in order to put an end to the functioning terrorist training camps and capture or
kill Osama Bin Laden, and that is not my opinion- those are the words of The Decider himself, George Bush.
Why you would bring up the 93 WTC Bombing is really beyond me, as Osama Bin Laden was never accused or charged with anything relating to that
"attack" which we now know was really the work of the FBI. Before you even think of attempting to debate that fact with me, I would strongly suggest
look into the audio recordings which came out in court which clearly show that the bombing was an operation under the supervision of the FBI who not
only provided the materials for the bomb, but knew what day, time, and area the van bomb was to be placed. Yet they still allowed it to happen.