It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
reply to post by TedHodgson
Yes I know. There is. Its up to the individual if they want to believe and what not to believe. I suppose the safest option is to go with the most widely believed opinions then.
I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by The Djin
reply to post by CandiceZ
For those who are interested and have a little more grey matter than someone stomping around claiming a dead man "is" an idiot -
PS CandiceZ I would argue that language alone proves evolution
www.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Im not even going to bother with any more replies in this thread im getting bored now.
Im not even going to bother with any more replies in this thread im getting bored now.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Grammer is not the subject in this thread, oh yeah and I still think Darwin IS an idiot. Im not even going to bother with any more replies in this thread im getting bored now. You all believe whatever idea some deluded scientist came up with - oh no, it wasnt even his theory - IT WAS HIS GRANDFATHERS THEORY. So enough said.
Originally posted by InDeMioN
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
Ok ...I didin´t think you would agree so here is another question:
Darwins theory states that a species is not infuenced by its environment in evolution (because this would include some "intention" behind evolution) but rather the mutation gives the species an advantage in its environemnt and be superior to other species because of this.
So ..penguins can only stand on ice because they developed a system in which their arteiries and veins are entangled and thus cooling/warmig blood coming from the heart/leading away from the heart so their feet/legs won´t freeze.
According to Darwin they must have developed this system per coincidence in a environment where they could survive without it and then have traveled to the south pole afterwards because they were - by coincidence - able to survive there?
Wouldn´t it be much more logical if they had evolved there with this ability as response to their environment ?