It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by lambros56
reply to post by GoodOlDave
I dont go to " conspiracy sites " so i dont know the guy you mention.
On the research i`ve done.....i dont believe the original planes with the original passengers hit the Pentagon.
If you've ever quoted the "Thermitic material found in the WTC dust" then you do know who he is- he's one of the people who co-wrote the report along with David Ray Griffin.
So are you saying Dr. Legge is mistaken in his research or are you saying he's a disinformation agent? If either is the case then doesn't that put the "thermitic material" claim into question?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart
As others have said, I will need proof. There is no evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon. There are some supposed pictures of plane debris, none of it conclusively showing the pictures were taken at the Pentagon. There were at least 85 working cameras that day pointing at the Pentagon and not one video showing anything hitting the building, only the explosion. The movie National Security Alert Sensitive Information is a great documentary that focuses strictly on the Pentagon attack. I suggest everyone watch that film.
If you are going to brush off all existing photographic evidence with such thoughtless irreverence, then what magical proof could any of the pentagon footage possibly contain that you'd ever accept it without likewise brushing it off?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by budaruskie
Let me get this straight. Believing that the Pentagon, D.C., and America in general would actually use the weapons systems that it spent billions if not trillions on creating is illogical...that's your story?
Its not illogical, per se. It simply avoids logical examination. There's no need to investigate your assumption since in your worldview your assumption is without form or limits. It can adapt to any challenge because it has no foundational limits.
Your uber government can intercept and neutralize any moving object at a whim, and failure to do so is only confirmation that the system was nullified by the "powers that be" for nefarious purposes. And of course, this uber government, once established, can now move about all branches of the conspiracy; performing miracles, perverting witnesses, corrupting officials and manipulating common citizens into acts of murder and treason on a biblical scale.
My "uber gov't" has a proven track record of intercepting planes in the U.S., in fact the only failures I've ever known of occurred on 9/11. Look it up.
BTW you should head on over to dictionary.com and look up the word irony. It best describes your last couple of posts.
Originally posted by The Baby Seal Club
WTH? What are you talking about Dave? I didn't say anything about WTC7, your thread is about the Pentagon, and I didn't say anything about worshiping Loose Change.
What I said was that you made the comment that all truthers believe that it was a missile, or a drone, something else besides a plane. I said that is not true. Truthers have many different theories but they do have one thing in common and that is the idea that the OS is false and that there needs to be a new investigation.
In terms of your problem with Legge and truthers who don't agree with him on the pentagon. How hard is it to understand that thermite (and the WTC theory) are separate from the pentagon? I mean I'll listen all day to Mike Tyson explain to me how to box, but I won't listen to him tell me how to pick up women.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by budaruskie
My "uber gov't" has a proven track record of intercepting planes in the U.S., in fact the only failures I've ever known of occurred on 9/11. Look it up.
BTW you should head on over to dictionary.com and look up the word irony. It best describes your last couple of posts.
Well, that and those thousands of planes filled with coc aine, grass and God only know what else that have been penetrating our airspace for decades even with your hyper-vigilant defense system intact and ready to pounce at a moments notice.
Originally posted by network dude
so should we take this as your admission that thermite or nano thermite was used in the demolition of WTC1,2 and 7?
Look, I can appreciate you diligence on this subject. As quite a few people have pointed out, us "truthers" fall into quite a few different categories. We all have different points of contention. The one thing we all agree on is not everything in the OS makes sense, so we have some questions. I think it's very possible that some of what we were told isn't true. I don't believe it was holograms, mini nukes, DEWs, or Oprah OTR.
Corruption does run deep...
many of those planes you speak of were C-130's that flew to Mena, Arkansas.
But that's a different thread on a different topic. Regardless, get in a plane (doesn't have to be passenger jet) and fly towards D.C., let all of us know what happens.
Are you going to actually back up your arguments or address mine? You seem content to keep placing softballs on a tee for me to crush out of the park...pretty weak.
Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart
I am not brushing off 'evidence', I have put more thought and time into 9/11 than most. Most of the parts are so small they can be picked up by hand. The other photos of bigger parts are close ups that could have been taken anywhere, better yet put there. It is weird how a plane supposedly traveling at 590 mph can crash and not damage the lawn and cause outward explosion patterns.
It is weird how it supposedly hit light poles traveling at 590 mph, knocking a light pole into a cab traveling at 45 mph and cause not a scratch on the hood, not even damage to the window frame. The same driver who's wife works for the FBI and admits he "is in on it".
Nearly all witnesses admit they never actually saw the plane hit, just the explosion.
I will accept a plane hit the building when they decide to release the nearly 100 other videos. Why won't they release them? Why the deception?
Originally posted by Xterrain
He's bought and paid for my the government. NO F**KING WAY DID AN 737 HIT THE PENTAGON. LOOK AT THE PICTURES FOR YOURSELF DIPSH*TS! WHERE'D THE MASSIVE ENGINES GO? THERE ARE NO HOLES OR EVEN DAMAGE FROM THEM, YET THEY *POOF* DISAPPEARED? F**K OFF!
Yes I'm mad....because everyone who believes that a plane hit the pentagon is an idiot with their blinders on.
Originally posted by Xterrain
He's bought and paid for my the government. NO F**KING WAY DID AN 737 HIT THE PENTAGON. LOOK AT THE PICTURES FOR YOURSELF DIPSH*TS! WHERE'D THE MASSIVE ENGINES GO? THERE ARE NO HOLES OR EVEN DAMAGE FROM THEM, YET THEY *POOF* DISAPPEARED? F**K OFF!
Yes I'm mad....because everyone who believes that a plane hit the pentagon is an idiot with their blinders on.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by network dude
so should we take this as your admission that thermite or nano thermite was used in the demolition of WTC1,2 and 7?
Nowhere in the thermite report does it say this is how the WTC buildings were destroyed. Please, point that section out to me, because the version of the report I read simply went into great detail describing only the material itself.
Now how about answering my question- do you or do you not accept Dr. Legge's findings?
Look, I can appreciate you diligence on this subject. As quite a few people have pointed out, us "truthers" fall into quite a few different categories. We all have different points of contention. The one thing we all agree on is not everything in the OS makes sense, so we have some questions. I think it's very possible that some of what we were told isn't true. I don't believe it was holograms, mini nukes, DEWs, or Oprah OTR.
That's not the point of Dr. Legge's podcast. His point is that just because you have issues with some parts of the 9/11 commission report it doesn't give you license to dismiss the entire report in knee jerk reflex, especially when it requires you to make up all sorts of paranoid crap to fill in the blanks of your own alternative version.
Why can't there be a conspiracy IN ADDITION TO flight 77 hitting the Pentagon? They cancel each other out only in your own mind.
where is the wing impact marks?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by budaruskie
Corruption does run deep...
So they're all "in on it" - knew you would go to that well pretty soon.
many of those planes you speak of were C-130's that flew to Mena, Arkansas.
Uh, what do you many? According to you either they all were or else they were intercepted - remember, before 9/11 your imaginary hyper government intercepted each and every plane!
But that's a different thread on a different topic. Regardless, get in a plane (doesn't have to be passenger jet) and fly towards D.C., let all of us know what happens.
Just did three weeks ago, landed changed planes and kept going, no big deal. In fact the plane flew almost over the Pentagon, no SAMs, no scrambled F-16, no anti-aircraft fire. In fact, didn't a small plane land or crash on the White House lawn in the mid 1990's? Where was your uber government? Did they just start up in 2000 or something?
Are you going to actually back up your arguments or address mine? You seem content to keep placing softballs on a tee for me to crush out of the park...pretty weak.
I am waiting for an actual argument, not just a constant repetition of denial.