reply to post by FoJAk
It was a bomb(s) and a missile and I will tell you why.
Like why not go with the "official story"? How about Rumsfeld being connected to Aspartame for starters.
No really what's going on? First, why didn't the Pentagon completely collapse in 2.6 seconds into its own footprint? Because no one individual had
any insurance on the thing.
I first started posting on here because of Dave. (Hey Dave) I read some of his stuff and wondered how anyone could think some of those things he was
thinking and saying. Seriously. I never knew Dave from other threads either, just one thread and I had to join. I tried putting forward at that time a
theory of sorts about how to look at the "attacks". It seemed to me then that Dave accepted the boxcutter option completely and I still could not
see it. I thought it's either really lucky terrorists with a bit of planning or really thorough criminals with a whole bunch of planning.
My money was on the latter.
But what troubled me about official story people is/was their ready acceptance of what was presented to them on tv and in reports, of even what they
found themselves on the internet etc.
Like Dave seemed convinced that "terrorists" did it, he probably still does. I don't know yet exactly who did it but my point to Dave then was
simply, that if you just merely accept what you are first told then you won't even think to look for the second right answer.
Like, a plane crashed here a few years ago and they gathered up nearly every scrap and glued it all to a mock up wire mesh skeleton of the plane in a
hangar till they had a pretty good idea what caused the plane to crash. But on 911 there were 4 plane crashes, but hey, it was "terrorists"
everybody knows it we don't need to glue any planes back together. Or, hey, the WTC fell down, it was "terrorists", using PLANES, everybody knows
that, saw it on teevee so hey, ship all that steel right on out of here!
Calling it a "terrorist attack" should in no way negate a thorough investigation. (Unless of course that ain't exactly what it is.)
When you all were kids did you ever get blamed for something you didn't do? Did you ever do something and then blame it on one of your siblings? Well
that kind of thing can go on and on into adulthood for some people. Did your parent or parents believe you and punish your little brother for
something that you did and they were fooled into believing you didn't do by you feeding them a clever cover story? Sure. Hey we all been there.
If you think it's "terrorists" then you might think simply, "Wow they nailed us at the Pentagon, damn!" Or "Look at that, two towers, two
planes, one plane per tower! crafty boxcutter Willies!" Suffice to say if you just think it's "terrorists" you probably think they were aiming at
what they could, had a bit of a plan and got lucky, and now we lost some citizens and some landmark buildings and well, life goes on.
And that's one way to look at it. A little planning, luck and timing, and like NORAD looking the other way on an extended coffee break, you know.
But look at it this other way, and try looking for the second right answer.
That would involve not small planning lucky "terrorists" but big planning skillful "criminals".
911 not as a Massive Suicide Attack but rather a Massive Bank Job.
Not an MSA but an MBJ.
What was that movie called where they robbed the bank and all 4 guys wore presidential masks? I can't remember, but did Ronald Reagan rob that bank?
No! It was a clever disguise!! Like that.
So I don't think a 757 slammed into the Pentagon, why? Because 911 was a very high precision Bank Job that's why. And a 757 is way too imprecise to
be very criminally effective. Oh, it's fine for run of the mill lucky terror strikes. But if you're a master career criminal it's a very crude tool
to actually use. 'Oh but planes were used on the Twin Towers I seen them!' Yes. But how? Not how you seen them but how were they used? Think more
You know it's funny right? Strange etc. Like it might be cool to them "terrorists" to take one or both of those towers down all the way. But all
available information on them at the time indicated they could probably take a single plane hit. So why not two planes into one tower, one the back
side of the first hit? Wasn't done. Interesting. Why not hit the towers at the same place on each but on different sides maybe? Wasn't done. Why not
target both about 1/4 the way up so that the sheer weight on each base would surely topple them? Wasn't done. Hmm.
Let's look at what was done. Tower One hit 7/8s way up on Island side, Tower Two hit about the middle on the harbour side. Interesting. Why? Well if
it's just "terrorists" then even hitting one or both of the towers is Mission Accomplished! Just hit it, it don't matter where. You hijacked a
passenger plane and managed to get it to New York City, just hit something. Right? It's so obvious. Obvious and simple. And deceptive.
But if it's "criminals" on a Bank Job... You watch any bank job type movies? They don't like or want any accidents, everything is planned etc. If
ANYTHING happens on a well planned bank job you can bet it was made to happen just like it does. All of it. Total purpose-driven control, or as much
as possible (some stuff may go wrong, flt 93 etc., but I mean over all) not haphazard, lucky to be there, hit anythingism. Right?
Everything for a reason... think carefully now...
Why would a bunch of "terrorists" crash a passenger jet into the Pentagon? No, really? WHY? It makes zero sense. Well, they're terrorists, do you
know how hard it is to hijack a plane get by NORAD and all the cameras on that building?! No no, the White House is just over yonder... the Pentagon?!
The newly renovated and reinforced side of it too, man, Donald Rumsfeld's office isn't even there, where? RIGHT WHERE THE 'PLANE' CRASHED IN.
Well then, what offices were in that part of the building on 911 anyway now that you mention it?
I'm glad you asked. Why don't you try asking Rumsfeld I bet he knows... he works there, though NOT on that side, I saw him picking plane parts up
off the lawn he had some aluminum in his hand, I think it might've been a diet Coke actually.
You want to know why the "terrorists" never hit the White House with their hijacked passenger plane?
Here's a hint: What terrorists or passenger plane...