It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't know and neither do you. It's beside the point. That has nothing to do with his policies or the job he's doing as president. It's just another issue to cloud the waters. Just like the teleprompter critique, his paternity, his religion, his friends, his sexual preference and all the other petty criticisms people make.
Why? Because it takes attention from much more important topics. It causes division and adds fuel to the fires, so two groups of people are locked into a seemingly meaningless debate. One side says he not a citizen and the other calls them racists.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e49475adc43c.jpg[/atsimg]
Admittedly I am struggling to make this point and hoping someone with more statistical knowledge will assess the facts presented in the poll results. Numbers don’t lie and as they say, the facts are stubborn.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
Survey Methods
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking Jan. 20, 2010-Jan. 19, 2011, with a random sample of 178,864 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.
For results based on the total sample of 56,106 Democrats, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.
For results based on the total sample of 54,593 Republicans, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each daily sample includes a minimum quota of 200 cell phone respondents and 800 landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents for gender within region. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, adults in the household, cell phone-only status, cell phone-mostly status, and phone lines. Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2010 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older non-institutionalized population living in U.S. telephone households. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting and sample design.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
Originally posted by glome
The constant vilification- at times whole multiples worse than the vilification of Bush- is the reason for the partisan split. Consider the utter lunacy of some of the charges against him:
1) wants to over see the fall of America
2) doesn't believe America is excpetional
3) isn't truly American
4) palls around with terrorits
5) wasn't born in the USA
6) is racist against white people
7) is a secret muslim
8) wants to redistribute the wealth
9) is a marxist socialist
10) wants to destroy the military
11) wants to destroy the dollar
I think in 20-30 years when people look back at this Administration they will see the corolary between racism on the right and the charges against him. Remember similar criticisms were launched against MLK.
It'll be interesting to see all the hateful letters revealed to the public once the Obama Library opens.edit on 4-2-2011 by glome because: spelling
Originally posted by glome
reply to post by Whereweheaded
Maybe go to law school before you say something. Commerce clause gives congress the power to do health care. All of your tea party judges and Attorney Generals and tenthers and lunatics can't change that.
Power to Regulate
The Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate commerce in order to ensure that the flow of interstate commerce is free from local restraints imposed by various states. When Congress deems an aspect of interstate commerce to be in need of supervision, it will enact legislation that must have some real and rational relation to the subject of regulation. Congress may constitutionally provide for the point at which subjects of interstate commerce become subjects of state law and, therefore, state regulation.
Although the U.S. Constitution places some limits on state power, the states enjoy guaranteed rights by virtue of their reserved powers pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. A state has the inherent and reserved right to regulate its domestic commerce. However, that right must be exercised in a manner that does not interfere with, or place a burden on, interstate commerce, or else Congress may regulate that area of domestic commerce in order to protect interstate commerce from the unreasonable burden. Although a state may not directly regulate, prohibit, or burden interstate or foreign commerce, it may incidentally and indirectly affect it by a bona fide, legitimate, and reasonable exercise of its police powers. States are powerless to regulate commerce with Indian tribes.
Originally posted by glome
I think in 20-30 years when people look back at this Administration they will see the corolary between racism on the right and the charges against him. Remember similar criticisms were launched against MLK.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Because in the past, presidents have been able to make eye contact on an 80% basis, where as Obama stares into the prompter 99% of the time, with a 1% address to the crowd. Huge difference. I was waiting for your response in his defense. Took longer than usual, your slipping~
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Because in the past, presidents have been able to make eye contact on an 80% basis, where as Obama stares into the prompter 99% of the time, with a 1% address to the crowd. Huge difference.
Originally posted by Newbomb Turk
Man I am slowly beginning to lose hope in my sorry ass nation waking up to ANYTHING
The EXTREMIST MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD that our prez IS A MEMBER AND SUPPORTER OF!
For the right-wing, it's not much of a leap to go from "President Obama is a secret Muslim" to "President Obama is secretly in league with the Muslim Brotherhood." And in the wake of protests in Egypt, leap they did.
IDIOTS posting threads about "Oh see there you go...Obummer IS NOT A Muslim because he just admitted (at a big annual national venue of the morning prayer club in DC where there was SURE to be a huge mainstream brainwashing presence that would be used to get the word out) THAT JESUS IS HIS SAVIOR"
Until we rid ourselves of the disease that is referred to as the PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL (or those that are just plain stupid)......
I am now simply going to be a consumer of information that is intended to my benefit only.
I categorically reject that notion, since this nation is the best country on the planet. Granted we have lost our way but we will survive due to our resiliency and history of overcoming hardship. It's just that many are too intelligent to subscribe to your myopic, fanatical right wing extremist view. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country." But if you'd like to lose hope and give up, don't let me stop you. Reminds me of a half-term Governor. :shk:
Originally posted by Newbomb Turk
Until we rid ourselves of the disease that is referred to as the PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL (or those that are just plain stupid),