reply to post by Mr Mask
Gawd. Not another one.
I can't believe you don't know what is going on. Who are you? Please some transparency Mr. Mask.
Masks are for what? Why?
Well you did a good animation I was encouraged to watch so I know you know some of our tools. But a holistic knowledge is a bigger picture view and if
used, you will see you are missing the point. Logic and critical thinking on the basic event are the best tools now. I don't see the sense in arguing
about Flea's ass hairs when we are talking about the dog it is a very small part of. BTW, the dog just threw up what you called proof.
I know UFOs exist. For a fact. I also know most or all of the skill sets, software and hardware you expound on. I use them every day.
If I took a picture of your mask and drilled down into a 2 dimensional 200 pixel area, I could find errors too. it would prove nothing. Reality is
riddled by infinite variation and instances of anomalous phenomena. It is wonderfully natural. Wider views are indicated. Please remove the reality
obscuring mask. You need see clearly the basic mistakes of logic you are making.
But the bigger picture seems escape almost everyone. Balancing the implications of this event and the significance of all that is happening takes wide
field comprehension. You have to take your eye off the microscope eyepiece to see where you are and what is actually going on. These videos are not
significant other than markers for a much larger implication. Do you know the significance of this sacred location? If this UFO event is as I sense
real, this is tantamount to a sign or communication for all people. You think it is faked. Consider it is not. Just try.
This thread is myopic minded right now. Why do you persist in keeping this going into a clearly entropy focused direction? You will be dismissed for
such ignorant understanding science. All these arguments for Hoax are mute. You don't know anything more than anyone else. Not proof. None.
But just seeing the videos, and now counter intelligence methods in play by possibly adding a fake version in a fourth video to do exactly what was
done to kill the Caret story and the California Drones in classic backfire-setting methods takes the cake. So you think that disproving the validity
of only one of the videos is sufficient to actually prove anything? That is freshmen logic my friend.
You do not have the evidence to disprove this event All these so-called forensic videos have no chance of being taken seriously by anyone but the
uninformed. Many are innocent, but are looking to someone to say yay or nay. We do not have the mechanisms in social networks with only semi
experienced people or unprofessional video tools and no originals. Try harder and amp up your methods and science reference.
Please tell us the best UFO investigative network/org you know, if not MUFON. Now expound on the reasons you dismiss all of MUFON and anyone
associated. I hear prejudiced opinions and not facts in your comments. I actually think all research is needed. Why not incorporate MUFON with all the
smaller group efforts?
Yes, this is a social network environment and you can say and be anyone you want to anyone you want. Funny, tough, witty, negative, positive, quirky,
talented, or with a mask. There is an assumption of anonymity here. But in science you need to show some qualities of experience and have some actual
understanding. Here anonymous is the norm. Fertile ground for many getting seriously ahead of themselves. Playing expert. This is not somewhere to
find proof or hoax. It is somewhere to discuss impressions and play with ideas. The video and discussion is fun. Until you think it means serious
proof of anything.
I am beginning to want to know who you are. I will share my identity. But with you only and you cannot share the information. Deal? I will tell you
about myself on a private channel to satisfy your curiosity. But you would need to do the same for me. I am not interested in a pissing contest. But
if you want to know where I get my informed opinions, I would be glad to share. Springer and others know me. Maybe wishing they did not know me
sometimes for the mud spattered on their shoes. I don't do well with disinfo dysfunctionals, trolls and their ilk. They get under my skin when they
You seem show sociopath tenancies in your expressive. you seem young or not formally educated, but have enough talent and personal issues and anxiety
related angst to make a creative out of you. People like to watch and are entertained by such characters. Not so interesting as to impress me however.
I want to know the real person.
I also observed that you pepper your comments with pedantic insults to imbalance and get your opponent emotionally off center. You are coaxing an
advantage you do not think you have. You phrase your comments about "proof" like it is actually evidence. It is not, and other sharp people who took
the time to explain these points to you where ignored. You are pretending. Or, you are flat out fueling a disinfo campaign to change opinions and
scare off news agencies from airing the event. They watch all this. ATS is the most active source for stories they need to fill the cracks in the
furnace for broadcast content.
I predict we will find out that this actually happened. Covered up by intimidation and a people under the control of opinions and veiled prejudice.
Also, a darker element. The kind who wear a mask between truth and the people.
You seriously want to play with these creeps?
So, cards on the table?
PS: Really disappointed this video and thread was canned by Springer on your word. Bad decision. A good industrial chemist would not allow a drug to
go on the market without proper scientific study. Really Springer? No time?
edit on 2/6/2011 by ZeroGhost because: Cut-paste error