Originally posted by WideOpenSpace
Another video full of fear-mongering BS. I can't see any facts here, regardless of what the OP is saying.
Astrologers strike back: New zodiac sign Ophiuchus is an old hoax
Astronomer Parke Kunkle's debunking of astrology and the viral wave of theories and anti-theories about the 13th zodiac sign Ophiuchus confounded the followers of astrology the world over, but also dealt a lethal blow to astrologers who withdrew to their shell groping for answers.The zodiac isn't wrong. Your sign isn't changing. Ignore the misinformation", thundered astrologer Rob Brezny.
Every year or so, another astronomer erupts into the mainstream media with a portentous announcement about how, due to the precession of the equinoxes, the astrological signs are no longer aligned with the actual.
Kunkle, who is a board member of the Minnesota Planetarium Society, said in an interview that the Earth's position has changed vis-a-vis the Sun in the last 3,000 years when astrological signs were first allocated and there is a new sign called Ophiuchus which dictates the course of many events. Because of this change of tilt, the Earth is really over here in effect and Sun is in a different constellation than it was 3,000 years ago."
Astrological signs do not line up with the constellations in the same way they did way back then, due to the precession of the equinoxes, he admits, but says this is irrelevant to modern astrologers. Modern Western astrologers understand this perfectly. It 's irrelevant to their work because the information upon which they base their hypotheses does not involve a study of distant stars or constellations. Rather, their data have to do with the movements of the planets in our own solar system within a zone of influence defined by the relationship between the Earth and Sun."
He ridicules Kunkle's assertion that astrologers have got it wrong as the Earth’s position in relation to the sun has changed. "Either this is a joke or Parke Kunkle is truly ignorant of his own science. It’s probably a bit of both," he wrote in an article in Planetwaves. Here in the West, we use a zodiac that follows the seasons. It’s called the tropical zodiac. It’s based on the position of the Sun’s rays and the tropics — that’s why it’s called tropical. There is another one, based on the positions of the stars. It’s called the sidereal zodiac. If Kunkle doesn’t know this, it’s like a race car driver not understanding the concept of a tire."
Originally posted by gsup1
I don't think what stereo is doing is anything personal. In academia and in pharmaceutical world when you make a case for something, people are going to challenge you. If you don't like that fact then why post? I looked through the video and you showed a 4 screen segment with some animations in there saying that now everything is screwed up. Can you tell me why it is screwed up and where you got that animation from? Who made it?
The birds incident can be explained with the firework celebrations in the town. The excessive noise disoriented the birds.
Originally posted by hapablab
reply to post by heineken
Great Job and I hope and pray you do not need to add anymore parts to that, this is getting a wee bit scary now.
Originally posted by baphomet420
find new music...
nasa has not confirmed a companion star or planet
pole shift has not been confirmed (well its always shifting, but i think your hinting at a more dramatic shift)
mars canyon was not created from a collision with one of nibirus moons...
there is enough going on with out making stuff up...
and explosions on the sun???
im sorry, but the explosions on the sun is when i literally fell out of my seat laughing....
Originally posted by heineken
1. I love that song so , cry more, the song is going to stay
2. Inform yourself...as much as i do...
Evidence mounts for sun's companion star
Giant Stealth Planet May Explain Rain of Comets from Solar System's Edge
3. The problem i can see with falling of your seat is that you didnt hit your head hard enough...please retry falling from your seat in 5...4..3...2...
edit on 17-1-2011 by heineken because: (no reason given)