It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OneisOne
Hi beezzer!!!
When you state "we" in your OP, are you referring to the group you meet with? Your local Tea Party organization? I'm not gonna do as many here already has and pound you as if you are trying to talk for the entire movement.
Thanks!
OiO
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Congratulations on your choice to be a Tea Party member! I agree with a lot of the ideas I've heard come from there, but they are being used by the right AND left for nefarious purposes, I'm afraid. So I wish you good luck in forming the party to be what it was originally meant to be before being hijacked for political gain.
Now, as regards people saying that Loughner is a Tea Party hero... Don't you know they're just saying that to get your goat (piss you off)? It's a political bait maneuver. Don't take the bait. Don't fall for it.
While it's probably true that there is at least one person who considers themselves a Tea Party member that thinks what Loughner did is cool, the vast majority of people (including you guys) think his actions are despicable. Most of us know that. Fear not. And my advice? Don't fight it. Ignore it.
Originally posted by 11PB11
I think if people were honest with themselves they'd see that democrats(liberals) began the hate speech with Bush in a way that is much much much worse than anything i've heard a conservative say. But lets be honest, liberals only ever see one side and forget just a few years ago their hate speech and threats, and now they pretend like the've never said anything hateful.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Sinnthia
I speak for me. An individual. I believe strongly in personal responsibility. I am a member, but I can't vouch for all members everywhere.
I wouldn't want to.
Perhaps it would have been better if I pointed out that I am ONE VOICE in a choir. Can't tell you about the other singers.
Originally posted by beezzer
The group I belong to doesn't kill people. We don't like serial killers either. Some of us hunt, some drink, some smoke, some do that "hippy" thing too. But it's cool.
We just don't like big government. ANY big government. Left, right. . . . it doesn't matter.
We trade ideas on retirement plans because we don't expect social security. We have doctors and nurses in our little group that swap medical approaches in case obamacare takes hold. None of us are on welfare. Many of us are former military.
We don't have shrines to Dick Chenney, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, or Rush.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by 11PB11
Your post does a great job of bashing liberals and Democrats without even touching the topic of this thread. Are you trying to present yourself as a TEA party person and pronounce that it is a purely conservative movement against Democrats or is that just a rant against liberals for no apparent reason?
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by beezzer
I guess I am just trying to be clear on if you are here speaking for the TEA party ideals, your personal ideals, the ideals of a small group of people, or what. There are a lot of people that claim TEA party affiliation and they cover a vast spectrum of types. Many actually do a great job of contradicting each other. I was just trying to understand how much of the TEA party it is your "we" represented. Please do not take it as anything more than an attempt to understand. When I see people claim there is no TEA party and then try to speak as a representative of a "we" I get a little confused as to what that voice is really going to mean in the grand scheme of things. Basically, because there are things I would like to understand about the TEA party but I am not sure if by asking you I am asking them, some of them, or just you.
Also it is up to the SCOTUS to determine the constitutionality of things not the tea party.
...The central vision of limited Commerce Clause power lasted until Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s presidency in the 1930s. Under FDR’s New Deal, the federal role ballooned out of all recognition. During FDR’s first few years in power, the Supreme Court struck down one New Deal law after another, holding again and again that they exceeded Congress’ constitutional powers.
Roosevelt became so frustrated with the Supreme Court that in February 1937 he proposed legislation which would increase the number of Supreme Court Justices from nine to fifteen. As President, FDR would get to nominate six new justices who would uphold his new laws. Under the threat of this plan, one judge — Justice Roberts — began to vote for, rather than against, FDR’s legislation. That made all the difference.
It soon became evident that Congress could do almost anything it wanted under the expanded theory of the Commerce Clause. In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled against a farmer who grew his own wheat on his own land and fed it to his own chickens and cows. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). Even though he never sold the wheat, much less across state lines, by not buying wheat from other farmers, he had affected interstate commerce enough to bring him within the new scope of the Commerce Clause. From that moment, most legal scholars assumed that Congress could assert power over virtually anything under the Commerce Clause."
Congress now regulates almost anything under its power to regulate “commerce among the states.”
www.hslda.org...
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by beezzer
I guess I am just trying to be clear on if you are here speaking for the TEA party ideals, your personal ideals, the ideals of a small group of people, or what. There are a lot of people that claim TEA party affiliation and they cover a vast spectrum of types. Many actually do a great job of contradicting each other. I was just trying to understand how much of the TEA party it is your "we" represented. Please do not take it as anything more than an attempt to understand. When I see people claim there is no TEA party and then try to speak as a representative of a "we" I get a little confused as to what that voice is really going to mean in the grand scheme of things. Basically, because there are things I would like to understand about the TEA party but I am not sure if by asking you I am asking them, some of them, or just you.