It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The office of Carolyn McCarthy, a Democratic congresswoman from New York, confirmed to me today that she will present a bill on Tuesday aiming to limit public purchasing of multi-round ammunition clips of the sort used in the Tucson shooting. Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey will introduce the legislation in the Senate.
For advocates of greater gun controls, this may be a small victory, but it would be a victory nonetheless. Congress would not have acted if this had been a “normal” massacre at a some shopping mall, but it may now that one of its own has been nearly killed.
Originally posted by Screwed
The office of Carolyn McCarthy, a Democratic congresswoman from New York, confirmed to me today that she will present a bill on Tuesday aiming to limit public purchasing of multi-round ammunition clips of the sort used in the Tucson shooting. Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey will introduce the legislation in the Senate.
One question I have not heard asked is,
If this legislation gets pushed thru, which it will,
what are those people who already own high capacity magazines supposed to do?
From what I have been led to believe thus far, if this legislation gets any legs it will not be like the Clinton ban in 94 where there were grandfather clauses for ARs and high capacity mags. ?
Are they supposed to just throw them away? Will there be a check point where we can turn them in?
A "Cash for Clips" program?
If anyone has any thoughts on this please join in. I find it hard to believe that those with high capacity mags will just willingly turn them over which makes me wonder if it is completly out of the question for the Feds to begin demanding lists from firearms dealers of all people who have purchased HCM in the past, say, 5 yrs. and then.......door to door "Visits".
[url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexspillius/100071710/congresswoman-mccarthy-will-propose-limits-on-high-capacity-magazines/]linkywinkywoo[/ur l]edit on 12-1-2011 by Screwed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FreeQuebec86
Why, unless you want to shot several humans... you would need 33 bullet ?
Originally posted by FreeQuebec86
it's a very good news !!!
WHY would you need a 33 bullet Mag clip ??
Yeah the law would take YEARSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS to be effective ( the time that the last 33bullet clip got used ).
But in 10yr or 15yr ( not long time on the mankind time ), maybe it would be impossible to find those 33 bullet mag !
Maybe im wrong about the 33 bullet number, but more then 10 bullet it's SO ABUSIVE.
Why, unless you want to shot several humans... you would need 33 bullet ?
More i come here, more i see that NRA propaganda is so strong in the USA... and so SAD.... You people talk about conspiracy, but one of your biggest you just deny it because you love your guns... WOW
33 Bullet is USELESS. You can't go hunthing animal with a 33 clip handgun xD Come on
Originally posted by solarstorm
Too many people like their Springfield XD-M's with a 19 shot cap (including me). The NRA will fight this with blood on their fists.
Originally posted by bozzchem
Originally posted by Screwed
The office of Carolyn McCarthy, a Democratic congresswoman from New York, confirmed to me today that she will present a bill on Tuesday aiming to limit public purchasing of multi-round ammunition clips of the sort used in the Tucson shooting. Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey will introduce the legislation in the Senate.
One question I have not heard asked is,
If this legislation gets pushed thru, which it will,
what are those people who already own high capacity magazines supposed to do?
From what I have been led to believe thus far, if this legislation gets any legs it will not be like the Clinton ban in 94 where there were grandfather clauses for ARs and high capacity mags. ?
Are they supposed to just throw them away? Will there be a check point where we can turn them in?
A "Cash for Clips" program?
If anyone has any thoughts on this please join in. I find it hard to believe that those with high capacity mags will just willingly turn them over which makes me wonder if it is completly out of the question for the Feds to begin demanding lists from firearms dealers of all people who have purchased HCM in the past, say, 5 yrs. and then.......door to door "Visits".
[url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexspillius/100071710/congresswoman-mccarthy-will-propose-limits-on-high-capacity-magazines/]linkywinkywoo[/ur l]edit on 12-1-2011 by Screwed because: (no reason given)
The term "high capacity magazine" is subjective...at best. What is considered a high cap mag? For which caliber? For which weapon? Tossing out subjective crap...as CONgress does so well is really a waste of both theirs and our time.
I'm sure I own quite a few mags that would be considered "high capacity". Will I turn them over? No. I own a number of different weapons and each requires a different magazine. Some dingbat in the District of Criminals who wishes to relegate any of them as "illegal" is nothing more than an employee trying to tell the employer what to do.
My magazines are nothing more than a piece of metal with a spring and follower that feeds whichever weapon it is engaged in. The magazines have NOTHING to do with what I am capable of since I can drop a standard mag and reload before you finish reading this sentence.
I will sleep well tonight regardless of the BS crap coming out of DC. LOL...then again, there is a gun show in town this weekend so maybe it's time to stock up for what lies ahead?
Originally posted by solarstorm
Originally posted by FreeQuebec86
Why, unless you want to shot several humans... you would need 33 bullet ?
Because if several humans came at you wanting to rape your ass because they are strung up on drugs, then 33 bullets may be just enough to prevent you from becoming a victim.
edit on 12-1-2011 by solarstorm because: (no reason given)