It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ericblak1947
Jared Lee Loughner is not innocent by any means. He killed an innocent little girl in cold blood.
You want evidence, watch his youtube videos, read his myspace postings, and listen to the eye witness testimony!
Originally posted by mishigas
Originally posted by gwynned
reply to post by PlautusSatire
But I DO doubt the whole thing happened. It's the Greatest Show on Earth. Kinda like 9-11 in reverse, I would say. That was tragedy. This is farce.
I find it interesting that with all the 9-11 investigators out there, no one seems to applying the same scrutiny to this official story. Shall we begin? What evidence do we have that the event ever happened? There are no videos, no photos of Laughner being hauled into court. All we see are police cars, ambulances, and stretchers in an unidentified parking lot. Why is the media ONLY focusing on Giffords and Laughner? What about the other victims. In a media circus like this, why leave out these important opportunities for more drama? Other than the 9 year old and Gifford's aide, they were all quite elderly. Were they already dead or are they photoshopped images.
The media keeps telling us Giffords was the target, but a Federal Judge who had received death threats is dead and NO ONE is talking about him.
The particular flavor of info coming out of Tucson not gory enough for you? Maybe you should camp out in Tucson for a couple of months and satisfy your lust for ghoul's gourmet? Just try to have some respect for the families and the community that will still be there when the cameras are gone, OK?
Originally posted by harrytuttle
Hey, if that's what you believe, that's great. I'm not going to knock you. If you believe he's innocent and the reason is because of a conspiracy that's cool with me. At least you are coming out and saying it.
Originally posted by FarFromEden
YES, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY is the foundation of American criminal law. This is why arrested persons are called SUSPECTS / DEFENDANTS until final disposition by a court of law.
Originally posted by FarFromEden
However, the disgusting display of inhumanity that took place in Tucson, AZ was witnessed by so many of the victims who survived
Originally posted by FarFromEden
in addition to the men who captured the SUSPECT while in the act of re-loading his weapon
Originally posted by FarFromEden
that I think it's safe to say you would be hard pressed to find any takers in Tucson AZ as to the lofty notion of J.L. being presumed innocent
Originally posted by FarFromEden
If I had just buried my murdered 9 year old child, the last thing I would care about is the pre-trial legal status of her killer.
Originally posted by PeoriaAZ
There is no doubt that he is guilty, there were a ton of people there, they couldn't frame for the act if he didn't actually pull the triggerp
Originally posted by backup
Gun residue was found on his hands consistent with taht of gun residue found on the massacre weapons. Sorry to say this bro. But its a closed case.
Originally posted by commdogg
1) The murder weapon had his prints on it.
Originally posted by commdogg
2) Ballistics will match.
Originally posted by commdogg
3) Dozens of people saw him do it.
Originally posted by commdogg
4) They have video of the incident, and no they probably wont release it.
Originally posted by commdogg
5) He had photos of himself in a "g string" posing with the murder weapon being processed at the drug store next to the shooting scene.
Originally posted by commdogg
6) He bought ammunition that morning and dumped it in the woods behind his house when he ran away from his father. They found the bag of ammunition with the receipt.
Originally posted by commdogg
I could go on forever.
Originally posted by Panda26
I think its a bit disturbing that you jump to write this, when so many peoples lives were tragically changed.
Originally posted by Panda26
A 9 year old child lost her life to this nonsense.
Originally posted by LegalTender
ps. the guy DID have a gun when he got tackled..and i don't think people would just tackle him for the sake of playing the blame game.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Will our own extra scrutiny in anyway effect the court proceedings? Is there anything we can prove based entirely on our own imaginations and conjecture?
Originally posted by windwaker
They have pictures of him posing with the gun in a g-string before the shooting. You must be out of your mind.
Originally posted by Gamecock
He was tackled to the ground and the fun was wrestled away from him at the scene of the crime.
Originally posted by CAELENIUM
Obviously some one did the shooting and obviously JARED LOUGHNER was observed doing it by more than just one or two witness.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Our imaginations, as in the beliefs people have that maybe everyone is lying
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
maybe none of the information about what happened at the scene is true.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
There is no evidence contrary however there is evidence that what was said to have happened happened.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
That means without any contrary evidence the theories you are contriving are based solely on imaginary scenarios.