It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thousands of experts came out against the NIST report and the report compiled by the 911 comission.
What if the government was duped?
Their other crazy claim, that there is some kind of conspiracy by those indipendent PH.Ds who spoke out
Herrit and Jones did find an explosive material.
Massive steel reinforced structures
can we conclude that at least in the educated world it is a small and exclusive club that gives the 911 comission report and the NIST report any credibility ...
There is only one way all four outer walls can end up ON TOP of the rest of the collapsed building.
When you acquire a weapon of mass destruction you use it, you don't hold on to it
There is only one way all four outer walls can end up ON TOP of the rest of the collapsed building.
The conspiracy theory started soon after the attacks, with the MSM
while it is the uneducated and ignorant who clinge to the official conspiracy theory.
Originally posted by Cassius666
"Find little to no fault", what makes you think that? And whats wrong with the engineers of engineers for 9/11 truth and other engineers? Only because a professional does not say anything either way does not mean he finds little to no fault with the NIST report.
It really just means that not every engineer in the world looked into 9/11. So where are the engineers and architects to back up NIST? Where are your experts? Defeaning silence. And NIST wasnt thousands. It is clear that not a scientific approach was used, but a political approach, to dig for soemthing to support a predetermined conclusion.
You are a conspiracy theorist. You talk like one, act like one, you seek to support a conspiracy theory with nothing at all, that is has a presidential seal makes no difference. You are the one twisting reality, in your mind its still 2001/02.
Also what do you mean by "them" . Apart from the fact that engineers and architects for 911 truth are not the only ones speaking out, what makes engineers and architects for 911 truth not credible? Not one of you delusional 911 deniers even attempted to elaborate on that. It is pretty clear that in 911 denier world anybody who finds reason to question the goverment sponsored comissions is a twoofie by default and can not be trusted.edit on 8-1-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by Cassius666
while it is the uneducated and ignorant who clinge to the official conspiracy theory.
Yes , everyone who doesn't agree with you is "uneducated and ignorant" . Must be lonely there at the top , huh ?
Originally posted by Cassius666
A word of advice. Just because someone has "engineer" in their title, doesnt mean squat. Just like how someone with "doctor" in their title doesn't mean anything unless its in a relevant field. A foot doctor is not trained like a doctor in brain surgery. A heart doctor is not qualified to do brain surgery.
Originally posted by lambros56
reply to post by okbmd
I didn`t say ANY newscasters were in on anything.
I said the media were fed a story, which was relayed throughout America and the world.
There`s no investigative journalism in the MSM.
They all share the same stories and video etc.
The BBC reporting building 7 coming down before it did proves my point.
The reporter in New York and the guy back in London BOTH reported building seven collapsing at least 20 minutes before it came down.
That`s no accident......it was fed to them.
Why some people don`t see anything strange in that is beyond me.