It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Thousands of experts came out against the NIST report and the report compiled by the 911 comission. Who supports the accounts of the NIST report? Is it just the small club of the people who compiled the NIST report who defend it and the ardent believers of the uneducated/delusional people who defend the official conspiracy theory, or did professional engineers and architect come forward in the defense of the NIST report, much like architects, engineers, firefighters and relatives of the 911 victims came out against it?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
not a single conspiracy theorist can come close to producing a report documenting a legitimate sounding alternative scenario that better explains the facts. All they can do is yell, "controlled demolitions" before running away giggling, and I don't need to point out this is a poor research methodology.
Originally posted by beezzer
I am a soldier. It's not like I believe that the government could do such a thing. I have a hard time believing that they would do such a thing.
Originally posted by beezzer
I am a soldier. It's not like I believe that the government could do such a thing. I have a hard time believing that they would do such a thing.
Ready your slings and arrows gents, but I honestly don't believe that they did.
Occam's Razor would help me in this.
Originally posted by ANOK
And no we don't just yell 'controlled demo', we supply evidence of that and you know it.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Cassius666
Thousands of experts came out against the NIST report and the report compiled by the 911 comission. Who supports the accounts of the NIST report? Is it just the small club of the people who compiled the NIST report who defend it and the ardent believers of the uneducated/delusional people who defend the official conspiracy theory, or did professional engineers and architect come forward in the defense of the NIST report, much like architects, engineers, firefighters and relatives of the 911 victims came out against it?
Seeing that the "thousands of experts coming out against the NIST report" are comprised of the likes of Dr, Judy Wood who refutes the report on the grounds that the towers were destroyed by energy weapons from outer space, you'll forgive me when I say I'm not taking the claim seriously.
Despite the self imagined, "even an understudy student can see it's incorrect" propaganda the conspiracy theorists employ, not a single conspiracy theorist can come close to producing a report documenting a legitimate sounding alternative scenario that better explains the facts. All they can do is yell, "controlled demolitions" before running away giggling, and I don't need to point out this is a poor research methodology.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by ANOK
And no we don't just yell 'controlled demo', we supply evidence of that and you know it.
No we do not know it, there is zero evidence for any form of controlled demolition, apart from the fact there was no time and no one noticed the hundreds of man hours required to rig the buildings for demolition, nor was there any physical evidence of any demolition.