It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by nake13
Thus I can assume that you are pro-life and anti-abortion(aka infanticide); correct? The child is still innocent before being murdered by it's parent.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Ms. Durham was born and died as an American citizen and never surrendered her US Citizenship and btw, there is no such thing as a minimum time requirement for residency in the US to retain citizenship. She married Mr. Obama the year Obama was born.
Originally posted by wasco2
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Ms. Durham was born and died as an American citizen and never surrendered her US Citizenship and btw, there is no such thing as a minimum time requirement for residency in the US to retain citizenship. She married Mr. Obama the year Obama was born.
You are right but that's not the point where Obama's birth is concerned. Under the laws at the time, in order to confirm US citizenship on a child born OUTSIDE of the country the mother had to have lived as a US citizen on US soil for 5 years past the age of 16. Obama's mother was 18 when he was born so could not have lived in the US for 5 years past the age of 16. What that means is IF he was born in Hawaii he is a US citizen but IF he was born in Kenya he is not since his father was also not a US citizen. I don't think it really matters anymore but I still think the odds are maybe 50/50 he was born in Kenya. He'll stay President even if they come up with 16mm footage of him being born in Africa with sworn affidavits from all who were present.
So, why won't he release real proof of it? Why does he take every possible legal measure to block, derail, and obfuscate the truth? Wouldn't be much easier to "shut them up" by just producing the proof?
He was born in Hawaii like I've just got finished mentioning.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
So, why won't he release real proof of it? Why does he take every possible legal measure to block, derail, and obfuscate the truth? Wouldn't be much easier to "shut them up" by just producing the proof?
He was born in Hawaii like I've just got finished mentioning.
Originally posted by projectvxn
This is so not a birther thread.
Thanks.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Interesting.
Birthright jus soli is the current standard by which born Americans attain citizenship. If you are born here, you are a citizen, no questions asked. That was the norm since the ratification of the 14th amendment.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Interesting.
Birthright jus soli is the current standard by which born Americans attain citizenship. If you are born here, you are a citizen, no questions asked. That was the norm since the ratification of the 14th amendment.
Now, will expectant mothers be required to prove their legal citizenship in order for their children to become legal citizens? What will be the ramifications if the baby cannot acquire citizenship? Will it be deported, along with the mother?
And what about those of us who attained our citizenship by being born here? Are we 'grandfathered in', so to speak?
There are some very shady implications here.
This, I want to know how that effects current citizens and children they may have in the future as well as the past, if these idiots arent careful, we will all be "illegal immigrants."
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Nephalim
This, I want to know how that effects current citizens and children they may have in the future as well as the past, if these idiots arent careful, we will all be "illegal immigrants."
No current citizen will be affected in any way, and the same applies to children of citizens. The law is not retroactive.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Anyone from January 7, 2011 (as an example) who was previously considered a citizen is a citizen. Anyone born after said date, must have at least one American citizen as a birth parent.
Doesn't actually solve that "Anchor Terror Baby" problem does it? That still means that every child born in this country prior to today's date is a citizen by virtue of the 14th Amendment.
Kinda makes this entire argument pointless.edit on 1/7/2011 by whatukno because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Nephalim
This, I want to know how that effects current citizens and children they may have in the future as well as the past, if these idiots arent careful, we will all be "illegal immigrants."
No current citizen will be affected in any way, and the same applies to children of citizens. The law is not retroactive.
Allow the Tea Baggers to write and pen the law and watch every person who is not in lock step with them be denied their citizenship,