It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 65
203
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:23 PM
link   
Okay - it's official - I am getting bugged out with the current locations of the latest quakes - most all areas of concern have been hit within the past 1 1/2 days. - Someone, please settle me down and tell me I'm wrong!




posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Magnitude
3.5
Date-Time
Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 02:13:55 UTC
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 07:13:55 PM at epicenter
Location
40.648°N, 124.760°W
Depth
6.6 km (4.1 miles)
Region
OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances
43 km (26 miles) W (281°) from Ferndale, CA
48 km (30 miles) W (259°) from Humboldt Hill, CA
51 km (31 miles) WSW (255°) from Bayview, CA
53 km (33 miles) WSW (253°) from Eureka, CA
366 km (227 miles) NW (311°) from Sacramento, CA
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 1.1 km (0.7 miles); depth +/- 0.9 km (0.6 miles)
Parameters
Nph= 59, Dmin=54 km, Rmss=0.17 sec, Gp=245°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=3
Source
California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR
Event ID
nc71544046



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anmarie96
Okay - it's official - I am getting bugged out with the current locations of the latest quakes - most all areas of concern have been hit within the past 1 1/2 days. - Someone, please settle me down and tell me I'm wrong!
Calm down and your wrong..
does that help?



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   
March 16 2011 Hi, I just joined tonight so please forgive me for now knowing what I am doing, but has anyone checked out the Yellowstone seismogram thumbnails for today? Look at Norris Junction... Scary



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by connieinutah
 



www.quake.utah.edu...

edit on 3/16/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: photo



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anmarie96
OKay --- What's going on here now???

5.1 2011/03/17 00:55:02 -32.465 -71.531 23.3 OFFSHORE VALPARAISO, CHILE
5.3 2011/03/16 22:36:16 -32.469 -71.424 24.7 VALPARAISO, CHILE

Source

Do I have to put the info in ext. tx or off site context??? - make for a bit of work/time on the dreaded dial up when things start hitting the fan


I hear what you're saying, its quite tedious, even copying and pasting.
In fact I'm currently changing my layout for the text lists for NZ, Greece and Chile for that very reason, and standardising the whole caboodle to match USGS (I give in )


Magnitude first eh


Re Chile, I updated to the end of the 16th UTC and caught that 5.6/5.7 but by the time I posted it there was a 4.8 as well (still on the 16th)
So that 5.1 at 00:55 must be another one.

I can't get through to Chile right now to check www.sismologia.cl...
thats not a good sign



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Everything is absolutely normal. There are no areas like Russia that are exhibiting seismic activity under volcanic fields at Amurskaya which has had no seismic activity in the past 365 days except this:

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-03-16T22:00:36.900Z,56.58000,121.50000,4.5000,20.0000,AMURSKAYA OBLAST’ RUSSIA
2011-03-16T18:22:48.900Z,56.55000,121.61000,4.4000,20.0000,AMURSKAYA OBLAST’ RUSSIA
2011-03-16T17:12:39.000Z,56.63060,121.30740,4.9000,12.0000,Amurskaya Oblast’. Russia
2011-03-16T17:12:38.000Z,56.65000,121.37000,5.0000,10.0000,AMURSKAYA OBLAST’ RUSSIA


The Udokan Plateau volcanic field occupies a broad area about 400 km ENE of the northern tip of Lake Baikal. Quaternary volcanism here represents the latest manifestation of activity dating back to the Miocene covering an area of 3000 sq km at the eastern margin of the Baikal Rift System. Late-Pleistocene to Holocene volcanic centers are concentrated along three major lineaments, and many eruptions were localized along fissures trending NW-SE and NE-SW. Dated Holocene volcanic centers are located on a 20-km-long line at the SW side of the volcanic field, but Holocene cinder cones also occur in the NE Udokan Plateau. Seismic activity has been recorded at depths of 15 to 20 km beneath some of the cones. The Udokan volcanic field is dominated by basaltic cinder cones, but basal trachytic ignimbrites are also overlain by lava domes and flows, and trachytic maars were formed during the final stages of activity. The latest dated eruption took place at Chepe volcano about 2200 years ago.


Smithsonian: On Google Earth

Or Trinidad (past 365 days)

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-03-16T19:18:56.900Z,10.22000,-60.23000,5.0000,2.0000,TRINIDAD REGION TRINIDAD
2010-12-27T01:00:14.000Z,10.76500,-61.69130,5.1000,59.4000,Trinidad region. Trinidad and Tobago

Nope, nothing is different or new!

That is except for my blog which now has Lists By Country on the main menu, which currently only goes to the Japan page - but I am working on it.



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by connieinutah
 



www.quake.utah.edu...

edit on 3/16/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: photo


What does that show?



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-03-17T00:55:02.000Z,-32.46500,-71.53120,5.1000,23.3000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2011-03-16T22:36:20.000Z,-32.50000,-71.37000,5.2000,60.0000,VALPARAISO CHILE
2011-03-16T22:36:16.000Z,-32.46860,-71.42430,5.3000,24.7000,Valparaiso. Chile
2011-02-18T17:01:04.000Z,-33.89050,-71.90560,5.2000,45.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2011-02-10T15:58:35.000Z,-32.60450,-71.79860,4.8000,8.7000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2011-01-19T12:47:18.000Z,-33.85150,-72.18010,4.5000,42.1000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2011-01-19T05:20:05.000Z,-33.70860,-72.03070,5.4000,21.7000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-12-01T10:01:44.000Z,-33.68450,-71.63330,4.9000,36.3000,Valparaiso. Chile
2010-10-31T07:10:40.000Z,-33.67580,-71.92340,5.4000,25.6000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-10-11T08:35:31.000Z,-33.79820,-71.75010,4.9000,38.1000,Valparaiso. Chile
2010-10-08T07:21:02.000Z,-33.61190,-71.91810,5.0000,16.6000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-09-20T05:42:56.000Z,-33.70020,-72.04120,5.4000,28.9000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-09-17T05:52:03.000Z,-33.61000,-71.94370,4.9000,27.6000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-06-25T14:33:56.000Z,-32.56540,-71.61310,4.9000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-05-23T01:51:41.000Z,-33.81530,-72.15210,4.7000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-05-05T03:32:37.000Z,-33.44240,-71.96510,4.8000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-05-04T22:58:24.000Z,-33.22890,-71.85950,4.7000,7.8000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-05-01T14:41:08.000Z,-33.18470,-71.92920,5.0000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-04-18T07:53:33.000Z,-33.40320,-71.92160,4.7000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-04-08T02:08:31.000Z,-33.24610,-71.93710,4.6000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-03-27T04:37:56.000Z,-33.52120,-71.82990,4.7000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-03-19T14:20:48.000Z,-33.14750,-72.00290,5.0000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile
2010-03-19T02:55:54.000Z,-33.49410,-72.12270,5.0000,35.0000,offshore Valparaiso. Chile


Just doing it's thing!



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Last mag 4 in NZ yesterday morning, pretty quiet here right now.

Magnitude, Reference, Latitude, Longitude, UTC Date (yyyy/mm/dd), UTC Time (hh:mm:ss), Depth, Location, Felt
4.764, 3479081, -45.02328, 167.39381, 2011/3/15 11:46:56, 114, S of the Stillwater River, Nr. Mary Peaks, Fiordland, Felt
www.geonet.org.nz...

edit on 16-3-2011 by muzzy because: add link



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:05 PM
link   
Magnitude 6.5
Date-Time

* Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 02:48:02 UTC
* Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 01:48:02 PM at epicenter

Location 17.364°S, 167.696°E
Depth 26.6 km (16.5 miles)
Region VANUATU
Distances

* 77 km (48 miles) NW (304°) from PORT-VILA, Vanuatu
* 212 km (132 miles) SSE (164°) from Santo (Luganville), Vanuatu
* 293 km (182 miles) NW (325°) from Isangel, Vanuatu
* 1882 km (1169 miles) NE (56°) from Brisbane, Australia

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 16.2 km (10.1 miles); depth +/- 0.9 km (0.6 miles)
Parameters NST= 73, Nph= 75, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.4 sec, Gp= 61°,
M-type="moment" magnitude from initial P wave (tsuboi method) (Mi/Mwp), Version=7
Source

* U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

Event ID usc00024wv

Thats a pretty big one right there.



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:08 PM
link   
reply to post by connieinutah
 


No, not scary - just overloaded.

The vertical sensitivity is too high. That is what is causing that. Actually the broadband side of that statin is having serious issues so that may well just be junk.



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Just done a count of the 6.0 quakes. This total is now coming up towards HALF of the total for 2010 and we are not quite QUARTER of the way through.

The average number over the past 11 years is 142. We are now at 69.



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Hey guys I am seeing big P waves in Japan, Washington, Cali And Ark...anyone know where it's coming from?



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Looks like it is from the south....maybe Chili?



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Vanuatu I think



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by premierepastimes
 


That was an hour ago



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

USGS says 75.
36 are fore/aftershocks of the Japan quake.



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 10:56 PM
link   
This is the SECOND wave....





The vanuatu quake isn't big enough to still be producing those waves over an hour later, is it????

Okay...maybe it is. I just realized how shallow the quake was. Funny how I am thinking of a 6.5 quake as 'small'.



edit on 16-3-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-3-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


I honestly can't say for sure, I'm pretty new to this myself. That was my best guess based on location and distance. Yeah, it is funny how these 6's seem small now. If it happened under us it wouldn't! We'll just have to wait for one of the big dogs to confirm it for us.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join