It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 34
203
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 


Water under pressure will reach that temp.




posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 

So,maybe fracking could be the cause of this?
Does anyone else have this for google earth?
The map shows a clear change in temp for surrounding areas.
That is if it's accurate or true.



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:06 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 


Im sure a good hydralics guy would be able to tell u but ya that sure sounds like it fits the credentials good find, now run with it



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:13 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 

I'm wondering,just how far down do they go with fracking?



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 


Its like asking after your plumbing goes,u think the lines are all ok or do we replace them all? Its water under pressure its gonna keep going till one things happens loss of pressure . simple



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:17 PM
link   
It looks like the geotherms start as a bubble just east of Little rock,AK,and spread south.
I don't know if it has anyhting to do with the quakes or not,but looks suspicious.



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 

Maybe the new yellowstone with geysers!Manmade geysers!



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 


Nope not enough pressure actually no where near the amount of pressure needed. no



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
So,can anyone produce a map of the fracking,a map of the quakes,and a map of the geotherms and overlay them?
Cause I'm going to bed.
Nighty,night



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 11:12 PM
link   
Magnitude 4.0
Date-Time Friday, February 18, 2011 at 04:59:49 UTC
Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 10:59:49 PM at epicenter

Location 35.248°N, 92.408°W
Depth 3.2 km (2.0 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region ARKANSAS
Distances 3 km (2 miles) NW (320°) from Greenbrier, AR
7 km (4 miles) NE (38°) from Wooster, AR
8 km (5 miles) S (169°) from Twin Groves, AR
18 km (11 miles) NNE (13°) from Conway, AR
57 km (36 miles) N (353°) from Little Rock, AR
422 km (262 miles) SSW (208°) from St. Louis, MO

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 10.1 km (6.3 miles); depth +/- 9.1 km (5.7 miles)
Parameters NST= 78, Nph= 87, Dmin=12.2 km, Rmss=0.84 sec, Gp= 36°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=5
Source U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

Event ID usb0001gkl



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 11:20 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 
Maybe this could be a starter?

















posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 11:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekeye2
New Zealand records 7 quakes just today - most of them around 2Mag but one at 4.4 Mag. It seems we are continually shaking to some degree and Christchurch is still experiencing quakes/aftershocks. We have two volcanoes on alert level one at the moment. The ring of fire is certainly living up to its name.

Take a look at the NZ quakes here: www.geonet.org.nz...


You are only seeing part of the picture, there were 45 quakes in NZ today. Those are only the ones reported as Felt by the Public.
Use ths page, there are various ways to see them, lists, maps etc, just type in the dates you want to see.
magma.geonet.org.nz...

I'll load them onto my blog tommorrow, I have been busy last few days, am a day behind with the quakes.

edit, at a quick glance at the data that Swarm at Kawerau has 19 quakes in it, not just the 5 shown on Recent Quakes page
edit on 17-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 11:34 PM
link   
I'm thoroughly enjoying this thread...I lived in the area of Sherman Oaks in the most damaged block (not counting the college campus) during the 1994 Northridge Quake. My block in Sherman Oaks was the cover of most magazines...the photo of the cars crushed by an apt building only revieling the lic. plates...the stairway to heaven...death, no power or water for 10 to 14 days, used the swimming pool for a cooler, had a charcoal grill (which was previously banned by landlord), slept outside for 3 or 4 days (police drove by 1st & 2nd nite) you were on your own...Lost my truck, had to find boards to close up windows, grocery store (Ralphs was on fire) had nothing, nearest store was 1 1/2 miles away (liquour store) & gauging for water & batteries...much more... Not telling you for fear mongering, only stating my personal experience...

There are many articles refering to Deep Water Drilling & Earthquakes (Sigsbee)...There was an earthquake in LA 1st or 2nd of AUG ...Deep Water Horizon was drilled near fault involved with trying to find the info as it was possibly related to something that happened in the gulf...
There are many articles that support earthquakes due to Fracking...it's nothing new, but the PTB knew we would be on it like Hot Cakes with the GOM & everything else going on...

Ektar



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 11:51 PM
link   
Disregard
edit on 18-2-2011 by bridak because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 12:13 AM
link   
i'm still trying to connect all the dots..

1st earthquake storm hit California, then Japan ..now Arkansas..

the Sun's activity this week was pretty intense..have a look




posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by bridak
The quakes in Arkansas were about 5km deep and now the last shake was a 4.0 at 3.2km...
Could it be that it is really getting higher and higher until it pops?
I am just asking...

Peace


interesting observation my friend!!



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 12:22 AM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 


Hey All! We have been following the situation in AK on Robin new Thread Here . Please join us. It is very important and will effect many!!!!



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   
Revised

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 5.1
Date-Time Friday, February 18, 2011 at 17:47:36 UTC
Friday, February 18, 2011 at 09:47:36 AM at epicenter

Location 32.110°N, 115.064°W
Depth 32.5 km (20.2 miles)
Region BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
Distances 20 km (13 miles) SSE (168°) from Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
48 km (30 miles) SW (215°) from San Luis R�o Colorado, Sonora, Mexico
51 km (32 miles) SSW (213°) from San Luis, AZ
190 km (118 miles) ESE (104°) from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 2.4 km (1.5 miles); depth +/- 20.2 km (12.6 miles)
Parameters Nph= 13, Dmin=69 km, Rmss=0.21 sec, Gp=263°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=4
Source California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR

Event ID ci14937372

edit on 18-2-2011 by Anmarie96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 12:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Good catch. I just saw that one myself and was headed here.

Hopefully that will be the only one there.



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Just a small one close to me last evening

Reference Number 3466704
Universal Time February 18 2011 at 4:51
NZ Daylight Time Friday, February 18 2011 at 5:51 pm
Latitude, Longitude -41.37957 174.63791
Focal Depth 25 km
Richter magnitude 3.919ML
Region Wellington
Location * 20 km south-west of Wellington

www.geonet.org.nz...

But what is interesting is the LISS graph for this. I think the signal is so large because the quake was only 9.57km from SNZO station
Look how the line went all funny before and after it




I had a look at SNZO through IRIS Bud Explorer Quack Query and it showed this on the HNZ Channel



I'm not too sure if I got the right graph image, last night I seen the "pipecleaner" one


Actually HN1 Channel shows it clearer
www.iris.edu...

There is nothing from Geonet Search, at the moment the 3.9 is the first quake of the 28th Feb UTC

Surely that red signal is not from this? a delayed arrival?
5.3 2011/02/18 04:23:18 -4.665 153.140 54.1 NEW IRELAND REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA
looking at USGS Phase Data for this quake, they don't give the Arrival Time at SNZO, but do have OUZ at 04:30:51.84 neic.usgs.gov...


or maybe that signal I marked on the LISS graph is the New Ireland quake and not the Cook Strait one at all.
The way the lines converge on 4:00 time mark on the left hand side, it could be, see there is a smaller wiggle on the next line down coming out of 4:00 also but dropping to 5:00-5:10 line


edit: And this, Geonets SNZO Quake Drum graph, shows another quake ( local?) 20 minutes prior to the 3.9



Will have to wait about 4-8hrs for Geonet to publish the 18th's data I guess

edit on 18-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
203
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join