Free Energy Produced - Einstein Proven Wrong Again

It's been a while since I've checked in with my favorite energy company, and much to my surprise, they have reported actual power production with their new method for producing energy.

www.blacklightpower.com...

Cranbury, NJ (November 29, 2010)—BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced that CIHT (Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition) technology has been independently confirmed by Dr. K.V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University Meritorious Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry.

“We have demonstrated the ability to produce electrical power using chemical systems for the direct production of electric power from the conversion of hydrogen to hydrinos, a more stable form of hydrogen,” said Dr. Randell Mills, Chairman, CEO and President of BlackLight Power, Inc. “CIHT has a forecasted nominal cost per unit of power compared to that of thermal-based systems and produces electricity without requiring enormous thermally-driven mechanical generators. Consequently, more rapid dissemination is expected by deploying many autonomous distributed units that circumvent the huge barriers of entry into the power markets such as developing and building massive billion-dollar power plants with their associated power distribution infrastructure. This is especially true in emerging markets.”

I believe these guys will single handedly save the United States population from starving to death during the coming currency crisis.

Yet another stick in the eye for all the Einsteinian relativists that clog up our academic institutions with their utter drivel.

Further, www.blacklightpower.com...

GEN3 Partners and Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Scientists have confirmed the light signature of hydrino formation, high-energy radiation emitted as the electron of the hydrogen atom undergoes a transition below what was previously considered the lowest energy state. Read the results in the GEN3 and CfA Report "Validation of the Observation of Soft X-ray Continuum Radiation from Low-Energy Pinch Discharges in the Presence of Molecular Hydrogen."

Einstein was wrong.

Thank god people like Mills are still around. We need more people who disbelieve the lies mainstream scientists spew out. All the mainstream cares about is hording government research grants and prestige. They don't give a damn about real science. A bunch of fantasy fiction loving math geeks that think they can create reality out of numbers.

reply to post by mnemeth1


How does producing energy useing a chemical reaction prove Einstein wrong???

BTW, that's assuming it works, which is not proven...

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

How does producing energy useing a chemical reaction prove Einstein wrong???

BTW, that's assuming it works, which is not proven...

According to SR, the reaction they are using to generate the power is impossible.

reply to post by mnemeth1

According to SR, the reaction they are using to generate the power is impossible.

OK, so what, I expect cheap/free energy tomorrow?
How long to PROVE the theory?

How long to get it out to all?
Will they release the details so all can do it free??

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

According to SR, the reaction they are using to generate the power is impossible.

OK, so what, I expect cheap/free energy tomorrow?
How long to PROVE the theory?

How long to get it out to all?
Will they release the details so all can do it free??

It is proven.

They are producing power with it right now.

Looks like they are figuring out how they are going to bring it to market at the moment.

I'm sure they will patent the technology so you'll be able to see everything by visiting the patent office. It sounds like they are going to try and make small generators with it. The original intent was to make large scale power plants using steam turbines, but it appears they have decided against this.

reply to post by mnemeth1


You know, It doesn't matter if Einstien was right or wrong. He was a brilliant man.

How about showing him a little bit of respect?

reply to post by mnemeth1


But how FREE will FREE energy be???
That's the question....

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

You know, It doesn't matter if Einstien was right or wrong. He was a brilliant man.

How about showing him a little bit of respect?

He's a retard that thought space could bend and led us down the wrong path of science for nearly a century.

He's the worst human being to ever walk the face of the earth.

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

But how FREE will FREE energy be???
That's the question....

Cheap enough to undercut the current market production costs.

The fuel source used in the power production is extremely cheap to produce.

reply to post by mnemeth1


He had theories. For the age that he lived in, in a world where technology was barely starting, he was extremely brilliant. 100 years later, we are only now just proving those theories wrong...... If he's such a retard, then what does that make us?

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

He had theories. For the age that he lived in, in a world where technology was barely starting, he was extremely brilliant. 100 years later, we are only now just proving those theories wrong...... If he's such a retard, then what does that make us?

It makes mainstream scientists a bunch of lying thieves for claiming space could bend.

Billions upon billions of dollars pissed down the toilet trying to "prove" Einstein's nonsense. Untold trillions of dollars lost due to the time science has spent down the wrong path Einstein created.

It is entirely possible we could have had this technology back in the 70s already if Einstein's nonsense hadn't been turned into some kind of holy gospel by the lying thieving horde.

If humanity had this technology back in the 70s, it is entirely possible many wars may never have been fought.

Meh, free energy is possible right now, all you need is an extension cable and a silly neighbour and you've got yourself free energy.

And if you're a good enough neighbour yourself, you can convince her to get the internet using wireless, which effectively gets you free internet too.

Nothing is free.

No matter how much you spend on convincing people it is.

hahaha listen in at 00:48 sec mark... he says most of his work is in photovoltaics and "wind turbans"...

sounds very interesting, and i'm quite sure that the discovery channel did a bit on this about a year ago.

i have to wonder though, what is this "blacklight material". it goes inside a "reactor", which is "placed inside a very, very well insulated container"... does this sound like some kind of nuclear reactor to anyone else?

reply to post by mnemeth1


No one was coming up with any better ideas back then. Who's fault is that? Apparently, no one was SMART enough like Einstein was to be able to come up with their own theories. So yes, money was wasted, thats life, get over it. It took us 100 + years to come up with a better theory. Which makes Einstein a genius. We once believed the world was flat...... Then someone came along and discovered it was round..... Does that make the person that said it was flat a moron? No, it makes them the only person that was smart enough to attempt to understand something that was bigger than them.

Originally posted by badw0lf
Meh, free energy is possible right now, all you need is an extension cable and a silly neighbour and you've got yourself free energy.

And if you're a good enough neighbour yourself, you can convince her to get the internet using wireless, which effectively gets you free internet too.

Nothing is free.

No matter how must you spend on convincing people it is.

Yeah, I use the term in a lose sense here.

It isn't really "free", its just really really cheap.

The energy released in the reactions is 'free' energy in the sense that it gives back far more than you need to put into it. The closed systems they are talking about building could be classified as perpetual motion machines.

More energy comes out than you put in.

Scam!

Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Scientists have confirmed the light signature of hydrino formation

CfA response ([email protected]):

The company Gen3 (representing Blacklight Power) paid for the use of one of our spectrometers and the technicians to operate it to make standard measurements of a supplied hydrogen sample. The results of those measurements were submitted to Gen3. A. Bykanov has no affiliation with the CfA and the Center for Astrophysics makes no claims nor did it participate in any research involving “hydrino transitions”.

Source: www.greentechmedia.com...

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

No one was coming up with any better ideas back then. Who's fault is that? Apparently, no one was SMART enough like Einstein was to be able to come up with their own theories. So yes, money was wasted, thats life, get over it. It took us 100 + years to come up with a better theory. Which makes Einstein a genius. We once believed the world was flat...... Then someone came along and discovered it was round..... Does that make the person that said it was flat a moron? No, it makes them the only person that was smart enough to attempt to understand something that was bigger than them.

That means a lot of people you assume are really smart are actually idiots.

Then again, they aren't idiots. We are the idiots. We are the idiots for continuing to fund their nonsense with our tax dollars while they rob us blind like snake oil salesmen.

Originally posted by moebius
Scam!

Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Scientists have confirmed the light signature of hydrino formation

CfA response ([email protected]):

The company Gen3 (representing Blacklight Power) paid for the use of one of our spectrometers and the technicians to operate it to make standard measurements of a supplied hydrogen sample. The results of those measurements were submitted to Gen3. A. Bykanov has no affiliation with the CfA and the Center for Astrophysics makes no claims nor did it participate in any research involving “hydrino transitions”.

Source: www.greentechmedia.com...

That's not a scam, that's what normal people call a disclaimer.

The research is valid, the CfA simply isn't taking credit for the research, Gen3 is. The CfA scientists were paid by Gen3, so Gen3 gets dibs on the research.

blacklightpower.com claims:

Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Scientists have confirmed the light signature of hydrino formation

which is clearly wrong!

reply to post by mnemeth1


If you could debunk Einstein back when he was alive, then he'd be an idiot. But no one was smart enough to debunk him until now. He had theories, and theories, are not proven fact, they're just a basic idea of what we think is going on. He gave us that. Now we have finally found out what he didnt'. No need to crucify someone for trying.