It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Like those nasty Iraqi rockets that went 20 miles further than allowed, and then used to demonstrate the case for war?
Oh no the 45 minute weapons! Ahhh run away to the hills!**Runs into wooden shed** "safe atlast in my super secret super protective bunnker built by JIC..."
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Look two Subs and 2 carrier groups would be enough to stop the Chinese form invading Taiwan. 2 carrier groups equals about 150 Fighter jets plus the Taiwanese AF.
Originally posted by COWlan
2 carrier does not have 150 fighter jets. It needs to carry other air crafts. Something around 100 is more realistic.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Those 2 carrier fleets need to get into position first...are you trying to tell me 1/7th of the US Navy's air power is now situated within several hundred miles of taiwan at all times?
Originally posted by zakattack
I wonder what the response would be from the US if china did actually sink a carrier
Originally posted by rogue1
You speak as though you think the Chinese are capable of launching a massive surprise invasion. This belief is completely false any buildup would be seen weeks in advance of any action allowing the US to position it's fleet with plenty of time. This is of course if they so chose to.
Originally posted by deltaboy
devil, we don't know wat the Pentagon dinks these days so it may seem comical to send about 40 subs, but since the subs aint doin much except going after whales to test new sonar systems and other detection systems, when and if China invades, the Pentagon will send a bunch of subs to sink the invaders.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by rogue1
You speak as though you think the Chinese are capable of launching a massive surprise invasion. This belief is completely false any buildup would be seen weeks in advance of any action allowing the US to position it's fleet with plenty of time. This is of course if they so chose to.
It is possible, are you going to say that if the chinese built up forces and left them there for say several months the US is going to keep 1/7th of its carrier fleet there?
Originally posted by rogue1
It would take the Chinese ships several weeks to assemble and load in the ports. This would be picked up well in advance by all forms of US intelligence gathering. Don't forget they conduct over 100 reconnaissance flights a year off the Chinese coast ( the year of the EP-3 II incident the US had cinducted over 250 recon flights off the Chinese boarder.
It would be very expensive for the Chinese to leave their forces in assembling areas for several months and extremely bad military tactics ( they would be far too vulnerable to a repemptive strike).
The US could have carriers on station within a couple of days and submarines even sooner. Not to mention as FredT has stated the heavy bombers flying out of Guam heavily loaded with antiship ordnance.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by rogue1
It would take the Chinese ships several weeks to assemble and load in the ports. This would be picked up well in advance by all forms of US intelligence gathering. Don't forget they conduct over 100 reconnaissance flights a year off the Chinese coast ( the year of the EP-3 II incident the US had cinducted over 250 recon flights off the Chinese boarder.
So its picked up, well done...can the US keep its troops at the level of effectiveness and authority for several weeks if need be?
It would be very expensive for the Chinese to leave their forces in assembling areas for several months and extremely bad military tactics ( they would be far too vulnerable to a repemptive strike).
If there was a premptive attack then they would have won....if the US attacks its the agressor and so would lose a hell of a lot of support it had in its own borders and abroad.....enough to make it think twice.
The US could have carriers on station within a couple of days and submarines even sooner. Not to mention as FredT has stated the heavy bombers flying out of Guam heavily loaded with antiship ordnance.
Try a week....almost 2
Heavy bombers dont sit on the runway with bombs as we speak waiting for some order to strike...that only happens during defcon 2 if I am correct that is the level the bomber are ethier airborne or waiting on the ground...
Originally posted by rogue1
Yes, they sure can. Wherever a carrier cruises they are constantly conducting exercises ot make them ready for any possible action - these cruises last for months. ' Alpha Strikes ' ( those against maritime targets ) are regularly practiced on a cruise. The carriers would also carry enough ordnance to be able to take on the Chinese flotilla.
Besides any type of invasion would be preceded by politicking, which would probably lead to an increased general alert of the Pacific command. This would also lead to increased preparedness of the fleet for copmabt operations.
It still doesn't change the fact that leaving your forces bunched up and vulnerable for your enemy to attack is very bad strategy, something which the military commanders wouldn't do.
A bomber can be armed within a couple of hours of the 'go' word several hours later they would be within range of the strait. Considering just one B-52 can carry 24-36 Harpoons, that is a massive amount of firepower that could be laid to bare on the Chinese fleet.
As I've said before any invasion of Taiwan would be precede by some type of diplomatic activity allowing the Pacific Air Forces to be put on alert, with several planes on quick reaction alert.
Just look at SAC in the 60's and 70's. The US Air Force has the ability and expertise to keep bombers at maximum readiness over extended periods of time.
As for submarines taking 2 weeks to arrive - where do you think they are ? Tied up to piers on the West Coast ?